Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ hobi power.

Channel

‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ hobi power.

@iamurh0pe

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

527subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003647116521
TypeChannel
Username@iamurh0pe
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/iamurh0pe

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

518549533.513 August 2026 — 518 subscribers14 August 2026 — 542 subscribers22 August 2026 — 549 subscribers29 August 2026 — 546 subscribers9 September 2026 — 538 subscribers17 September 2026 — 527 subscribers52713 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 35 days, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 513–554 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 20:19527-11
9 Sept 2026, 07:16538-8
29 Aug 2026, 22:38546-3
22 Aug 2026, 18:43549+7
14 Aug 2026, 16:03542+24
13 Aug 2026, 15:17518first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

129 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😭6348.8%
💋5643.4%
💘107.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 13:47 UTC95 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

این ترجمه یه توییتی بود خیلی قشنگ بود

😭11💋3💘2

13 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC302 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026

نه ریانا مقصره، نه اتفاقی که براش افتاده کم‌اهمیت میشه، نه اینکه چون خودش بعداً باهاش تعامل داشته پس کریس آدم بی‌گناهیه. فقط دارم به این دوگانگی و ساده‌سازی ماجرا اشاره میکنم که بعضیا برای کوبیدن بتس دارن انجام میدن

💋12

Signed pr

13 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC172 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026

منظورم این بود که وقتی دارید رفتار بتس رو قضاوت میکنید، نمیتونید ماجرا رو طوری تعریف کنید انگار این اتفاق همین دیروز افتاده و هیچ اتفاقی بعد از اون نیفتاده. این ماجرا مربوط به ۱۷ سال پیشه و اتفاقاً خود ریانا هم چند سال بعد از اون ماجرا با کریس دوباره همکاری و اینتراکشن‌های مختلف داشته 😭

💋14

Signed pr

13 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC178 views13 reactionsread 13 August 2026

این وسط واقعاً نمیفهمم چرا بعضیاتون حرفی که من زدم رو بد برداشت کردید و فکر کردید دارم ظلمی که به ریانا شده رو نادیده میگیرم یا دارم از کریس براون دیفند میکنم... حقیقتاً کیرم تو کریس و امثالش و کاری که با ریانا کرده، و فکر نمیکنم چیزی که به ریانا گذشته قابل توجیه یا دفاع باشه. پوینت حرف من اصلاً این نبود که چون خود ریانا بعداً باهاش همکاری کرده، پس کاری که کریس کرده مهم نیست یا دیگه نباید بابتش ازش انتقاد کرد

💋13

Signed pr

13 Aug 2026, 12:41 UTC172 viewsread 13 August 2026

بیاید یه چیزی بگم بد برداشت نکنید آجیا

Signed pr

13 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC235 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

البته این همه دیفند کردیم ولی کیپاپر نتیجه میگیره برای سابرینا اکلیل برینه و بگه بتس چرا تو اون کنسرت حضور داشت

😭11

Signed ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ raana ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

13 Aug 2026, 11:46 UTC684 viewsread 13 August 2026

بعد الان دارید میگید ۱۷ سال پیش برای ریانا همچین اتفاقی افتاده چرا بتس کریس براون گوش میده؟؟؟

Signed pr

13 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC811 viewsread 13 August 2026

جالب‌تر اینه که این اولین همکاری‌شون بعد از اون اتفاق نبود. سال ۲۰۱۲ روی ریمیکس‌های birthday cake ریانا و turn up the music کریس براون هم باهمدیگه همکاری کردن

Signed pr

13 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC691 viewsread 13 August 2026

ریانا رو هم به خاطر فراموش کردن گذشته‌ی خودش و حمایت نکردن از خودش کنسل کنید دیگه؟ چرا انقدر استانداردتون دو‌گانه‌ست 😭 درکل هیچکس اینجا رفتار کریس رو تایید نکرده و نمیکنه ولی اگه کنسرت رفتن بی‌تی‌اس به معنی حمایت و تایید کارای کریسه چرا به کسایی که باهاش فیت میدن یا اینتراکشن دارن گیر نمیدید

Signed pr

13 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 13 August 2026

محض اطلاعتون از این ماجرا، ۸ فوریه ۲۰۰۹، کریس براون به ریانا که اون زمان دوست‌دخترش بود حمله‌ی فیزیکی میکنه و بهش اسیب میزنه، بعدشم به ۵ سال آزادی مشروط، ۶ ماه انجام خدمات اجتماعی و یه سال شرکت تو جلسات مشاوره‌ی مربوط به خشونت خانگی محکوم میشه من اصلا کاری به خود کریس و کارایی که کرده ندارم، ولی شمایی که میگید نامهوپ چرا ۱۷ سال بعد از اون اتفاقی که برای ریانا افتاد رفتن کنسرت کریس ( درواقع بخاطر آشر رفتن ) لازمه بدو

Signed pr

13 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC300 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026

و یارو کل آهنگاش هیت و وایرال میشه ، خب اگر مشکل داره چرا وایرالش میکنید و انقدر فالوور داره؟؟😭

😭11

Signed ‌‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ raana ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @iamurh0pe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ ‌ hobi power.” (@iamurh0pe), 527 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iamurh0pe.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.