Sample Notes...UPSC EPFO APFC 2026....Exam Date - 20 December 2026

Channel
IAS PCS Factory
@iaspcsfactory
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
87,202subscribers
+2,303 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001447645037 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iaspcsfactory |
| Description | The Chief Mentor's Credentials: ✓UPSC CSE Interview ✓ BPSC Civil Services Rank 80 ✓UPPSC Upper Interview. ✓UPSC CAPF AC AIR 158 ✓UPSC EPFO AO/EO AIR 258 ✓IB ACIO selected ✓NET-JRF Twice ✓ Delhi University Rank 1 Courses Enquiry 7323090665 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iaspcsfactory |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 04:08 | 87,202 | +12 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 04:36 | 87,190 | +6 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:22 | 87,184 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 02:48 | 87,188 | -6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:28 | 87,194 | -14 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:29 | 87,208 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 05:07 | 87,209 | +19 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:17 | 87,190 | +25 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:08 | 87,165 | +11 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:16 | 87,154 | +48 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 05:27 | 87,106 | +90 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 05:07 | 87,016 | +22 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:50 | 86,994 | +38 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:38 | 86,956 | +80 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:44 | 86,876 | +71 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:28 | 86,805 | +53 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 21:45 | 86,752 | +236 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 20:07 | 86,516 | +5 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:56 | 86,511 | +30 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 86,481 | first reading |
Engagement
408 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 184 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.9%
- avg views ÷ 87,202 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 13,900
- 97 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.401%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 97
- of 408 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 62 of 97 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 408 (6 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,348,910 |
| Reactions total | 3,450 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 19:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,380
- Videos
- ≈25
- Links
- ≈306
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 3m 53s
- Average length
- 1m 18s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
24,504 reactions across 367 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14,613 | 59.6% | |
| 🙏 | 3,524 | 14.4% | |
| 👍 | 1,686 | 6.88% | |
| 🔥 | 1,297 | 5.29% | |
| 😍 | 726 | 2.96% | |
| 😭 | 713 | 2.91% | |
| 👌 | 518 | 2.11% | |
| 🥰 | 322 | 1.31% | |
| 🗿 | 212 | 0.865% | |
| 👏 | 201 | 0.82% | |
| ✍ | 141 | 0.575% | |
| 😎 | 137 | 0.559% | |
| 🤷♂ | 130 | 0.531% | |
| 🤷 | 126 | 0.514% | |
| 🤷♀ | 69 | 0.282% | |
| 😇 | 20 | 0.082% | |
| 😘 | 16 | 0.065% | |
| 🤗 | 13 | 0.053% | |
| 🤝 | 12 | 0.049% | |
| 🫡 | 12 | 0.049% | |
| 3 further kinds | 16 | 0.065% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 368 of the 408 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,504 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 408 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 97 posts held from the last 30 days (8.25%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
30/31 Jan - Expected
https://youtu.be/HxOlehBcVg8
सामाजिक सुरक्षा संहिता 2020 [EPFO APFC 2026].pdf
Sample Notes
Sample Notes
Batch 2 is full now. Batch 2 syllabus completion date - 31 December 2026. Batch 3 - Mains Ready by 31 January 2027 Here is Batch 3 for 72nd BPSC Mains. ONE STOP SOLUTION. Stop hunting average content in the market. The competition level is getting to the level never expected before. You have an opportunity to learn & secure a prestigious rank from someone with the experience of Qualifying Exams conducted by the pr…
Practice Questions 05 Nov 2026.pdf
Photo, posted without a caption
Mains Practice Questions.pdf
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 408 posts we hold for @iaspcsfactory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@iaspcsfactory edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 5 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 5 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @iaspcsfactory as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 4 November 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 4 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 4 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Polls
The 6 most recent of 20 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Do you prefer classes through PDFs or Slides?
- PDFs81%
- Slides22%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Bihar SDG Conclave 2026 was organized by Planning & Development Department with which of the follwing?
- UNICEF34%
- UNESCO46%
- WHO13%
- WTO7%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
The 28th Western Zonal Council meeting was held under the chairmanship of Union Home Minister Amit Shah on 07 September 2026. The meeting took place at which of the following locations?
- Goa29%
- Maharashtra38%
- Gujarat28%
- Rajasthan4%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
With reference to the glacial lakes, consider the following pairs: 1. Shako Chho Lake – Sikkim 2. Gurudongmar Lake – Sikkim 3. Satopanth Tal – Uttarakhand How many of the pairs given above are correctly matched?
- Only one pair11%
- Only 2 pairs54%
- All 3 pairs33%
- None2%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which country will host the SCO (Sanghai Cooperation Organisation) Summit 2027?
- Pakistan34%
- India31%
- China18%
- Russia9%
- None of the Above8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
With reference to the Zonal Councils in India, which of the following statements are correct? 1. The 31st meeting of the Southern Zonal Council is scheduled to be held at Mahabalipuram, Tamil Nadu, on 20 August 2026. 2. Zonal Councils are headed by PM.
- 1 only54%
- 2 only7%
- Both 1 & 236%
- None2%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 408 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@AASTHAIAS · 25,508
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 13 September 2026
@onlyiasnothingelse · 203,905
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 August 2026
@oszbynikki · 22,302
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 32 here — alongside 31 others — read 26 September 2026
@mission50ias · 24,548
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 14 September 2026
@iaspcspathshalauppcs · 51,732
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 25 August 2026
@bpsc_exam_prep · 26,376
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 12 September 2026
@perfectioniasofficial · 60,287
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 August 2026
@iaspcspathshala · 186,415
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 11 August 2026
@bpscconceptwallah · 50,637
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
@eduteriatestseries · 506,862
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026
@kpsckannadiga · 21,162
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 26 September 2026
@pritipaper1 · 25,408
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 September 2026
@CivilsNetwork · 75,131
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 August 2026
@PWOnlyiasofficial · 81,220
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 18 August 2026
@shankariasacademychennai · 59,865
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
@DrVipanGoyal · 130,413
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
@studyforcivilservices · 289,563
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IAS PCS Factory” (@iaspcsfactory), 87,202 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iaspcsfactory.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.