Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ࣪ 𓈄 ✿ 𝒫ulpy, asaa ! 중8 𓂂 ׅ

Channel

࣪ 𓈄 ✿ 𝒫ulpy, asaa ! 중8 𓂂 ׅ

@ibagian

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

subscribers

Risers and fallers across the register.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001719314080
TypeChannel
Username@ibagian
Description✿ ˚ ִ ⠳ exquisite daily girl who likes cookies, 🥈 봄의 아름다움 ⊂⊃ 𓂂 has heart that is as soft 𓊆 𝒞utesy—teen! t.me/Mieaka ◌ 𝅄 🎂 ⫾﹒𓂂 as a cotton candy (&.) chubby cheeks that are like cherries 𓈄 𓈒 ׂ
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded29 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held0
On Telegramt.me/ibagian

Growth

Growth history is still building. We hold no measurements for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

10 Mar 2025, 15:57 UTC104 viewsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @TimmyFess

#cummy "am I worthy?" is a question I have been asking myself for a long time.

31 Jan 2025, 11:43 UTC174 viewsread 29 August 2026

᭺ 𓂂 ๋ 봄의 아름다움 taking a diary book on the dressing table (&.) then wrote the journal ˚ ִ ⠳ 🗒 with her beautiful curly finger ◌ ˚ ✿ ⸼ i named each paper “rant and dump” makes every letter meaningful 🧴 𓈄 𓈒 ׂ

31 Jan 2025, 11:43 UTC110 viewsread 29 August 2026

✿ 。 일상 활동 sow flour and various other ingredients, 승5 ⠟ stirring the cake dough carefully and not missing any steps 𓂃 🎂 𓂂 ׅ until the awaited time is when the cookies is cooked ˚ ִ ⠳ 𓈄 𓈒 ✿ 𝒫retty, 빵의 달콤한 맛 🪞 (ii. 𓂂 🫓 ° making a love shape with strawberry jam in it (&.) then decorated with pink ribbons ✿ 𓂂 that make it look more pretty and very unfortunate 유1O

31 Jan 2025, 11:41 UTC121 viewsread 29 August 2026
Poll

행복 𓈒 ✿ heart full of love 𓈄 𓈒 ׂ as soft as milk creamy

  1. 🎂 𓈒 meaningful hug ⠲ ْ ♡ 𝒞utie ’s, 매우 아름다운 . 𓏸39%
  2. ⢬ 🥈 decorating cookies 장미 ﹒𓂋 with various sprinkles 𓏸𓈒ㅤ🫓39%
  3. 𓄯 일상 활동 ) . 🥚 ˚ strokes my little cure ◌ ۪⠀21%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ibagian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jan 2025, 11:41 UTCAnonymous Poll33 voters

행복 𓈒 ✿ heart full of love 𓈄 𓈒 ׂ as soft as milk creamy

  1. 🎂 𓈒 meaningful hug ⠲ ْ ♡ 𝒞utie ’s, 매우 아름다운 . 𓏸39%
  2. ⢬ 🥈 decorating cookies 장미 ﹒𓂋 with various sprinkles 𓏸𓈒ㅤ🫓39%
  3. 𓄯 일상 활동 ) . 🥚 ˚ strokes my little cure ◌ ۪⠀21%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2025 to 10 March 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. This entry holds no subscriber measurement yet, so the line below cites the entry itself.

“࣪ 𓈄 ✿ 𝒫ulpy, asaa ! 중8 𓂂 ׅ” (@ibagian). Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ibagian.

No subscriber measurement is held for this entry yet, so there is no history to download — a download that asserted zero readings would be a false statement, not an empty one.