Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ICB Network

Channel

ICB Network

@icbnet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,333subscribers

-357 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002110574128
TypeChannel
Username@icbnet
Description🚀 Explore the future of blockchain in our group dedicated to advanced Layer 1 tech! 🌐 Join for innovation and limitless possibilities! 🌟 Official Links: https://linktr.ee/icbnetwork
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/icbnet

Growth

15,33315,69015,511.56 August 2026 — 15,690 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,690 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,685 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,677 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,663 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,652 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,631 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,629 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,622 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,603 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,592 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,574 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,538 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,494 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,474 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,466 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,467 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,452 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,437 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,428 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,418 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,417 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,404 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,396 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,371 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,342 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,333 subscribers6 August 20262 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 27 days, net -357. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,279–15,744 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 09:5715,333-9
1 Sept 2026, 10:0415,342-29
31 Aug 2026, 08:3315,371-25
30 Aug 2026, 06:5315,396-8
29 Aug 2026, 06:4715,404-13
28 Aug 2026, 04:5315,417-1
27 Aug 2026, 03:1215,418-10
26 Aug 2026, 00:1715,428-9
24 Aug 2026, 23:0515,437-15
23 Aug 2026, 07:5315,452-15
21 Aug 2026, 16:4815,467+1
20 Aug 2026, 17:5315,466-8
19 Aug 2026, 20:4215,474-20
18 Aug 2026, 18:3715,494-44
17 Aug 2026, 16:1715,538-36
16 Aug 2026, 08:5715,574-18
14 Aug 2026, 21:4315,592-11
13 Aug 2026, 11:2315,603-19
12 Aug 2026, 07:4615,622-7
11 Aug 2026, 08:5215,629first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 52 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.06%
avg views ÷ 15,333 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,080
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held34 (21 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total15,163
Reactions total463
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 17:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,290
Videos
218
Links
1,400

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
15s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,048 reactions across 32 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
48145.9%
👍22021.0%
🔥21120.1%
👏747.06%
❤‍🔥353.34%
🎉161.53%
🤩70.668%
🥰40.382%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,073 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 15:44 UTC359 views32 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Immutability Is Not the End of Security A blockchain can preserve records for decades, but the cryptographic standards protecting ownership and authorization will continue to evolve. Immutability secures history; it does not freeze security architecture in time. For long-lived infrastructure such as ICB Network, resilience means preserving continuity while remaining capable of adapting to new cryptographic standard

19👍8🥰3🔥2

31 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC521 views28 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

🌍 NEW ICB PREDICTION 🇷🇺🇨🇳 Will Russia and China announce a Power of Siberia 2 agreement by September 2, 2026? Putin and Xi are holding bilateral talks as major Russia–China energy cooperation remains in focus. What do you predict? 🟢 YES — Agreement announced 🔴 NO — No agreement announced Make your prediction 👇 https://icbdex.com/predictions ⏳ Resolution Deadline: September 2, 2026 #ICB #ICBDEX #Predictions #Russia #C

🔥169👍3

30 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC623 views39 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Security That Can Evolve Cryptography is not static. As computing evolves, the security assumptions behind digital signatures, validators, wallets, and smart contracts may need to evolve with it. For long-lived blockchain infrastructure, the deeper question is not simply whether a network is secure today, but whether its security architecture can adapt as cryptographic standards change. Crypto-agility, safe migrati

21👍9🔥8👏1

27 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC886 views41 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Preparing for Quantum Without the Hype Quantum computing is not an overnight crisis for blockchain. The more practical challenge is that cryptographic infrastructure can take years to evolve, across wallets, validators, identities, and applications. Waiting for a threat to become urgent is rarely a sound infrastructure strategy. For networks built to support long-term digital trust, resilience means designing for c

18👍15🔥7👏1

25 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC944 views40 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Crypto Agility: Building for Cryptographic Change Blockchain infrastructure is built for more than the standards of today. Crypto agility is the ability to evolve cryptographic components over time, supporting new key types, signature schemes, key rotation, wallet migration, and verification continuity without rebuilding the entire network. For EVM-compatible ecosystems, this matters because compatibility and crypt

19🔥14👍7

22 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC≈1,200 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Crypto-Agility: Designing for Change Crypto-agility is becoming a defining principle of long-term blockchain security. A future-ready Layer 1 should not be judged only by how fast or efficiently it performs today, but by how well its cryptographic foundations can evolve as security standards change. That means creating upgrade paths for signatures, key management, validator software, wallet standards, and verificat

17👍13🔥1

21 Aug 2026, 18:37 UTC≈1,060 views32 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

🏆 EWC 2026 — CS2 Championship Prediction is LIVE! Who will take the trophy in Paris and become the EWC 2026 CS2 Champion? 🔥 Pick your winner and make your prediction now! 🎮 Predict Now: https://icbdex.io/predictions 📅 Final — August 23, 2026 Predict. Compete. Win. 🏆 #ICB #ICBDEX #EWC2026 #CS2 #Esports

12🔥10👍9🥰1

20 Aug 2026, 12:36 UTC≈1,130 views33 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Crypto-Agility Over “Quantum-Proof” “Quantum-proof” sounds definitive. Crypto-agility is more credible. As cryptographic standards evolve, resilient blockchain infrastructure should be designed to adapt without disrupting ownership, applications, or network continuity. That means thinking beyond a single algorithm and toward upgradeable security foundations across accounts, validators, wallets, and smart-contract e

19👍8🔥6

17 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC≈1,260 views29 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

As AI Scales, Trust Becomes Infrastructure As AI generates more content, identities, software, and autonomous actions, the digital world gains speed but also more uncertainty. Who created an asset? Who authorized an AI agent? Can an achievement or ownership record be independently verified? This is where trust infrastructure becomes essential. AI can interpret, automate, and adapt; blockchain can preserve verifiabl

11👍9🔥9

14 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC≈1,370 views31 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Infrastructure for Intelligent Systems AI can analyze, generate, personalize, and automate. But intelligent systems still need a trusted foundation for identity, ownership, verification, and programmable coordination. That is where blockchain infrastructure becomes essential. ICB Network provides the trust layer beneath digital applications: an EVM-compatible Layer 1 designed for smart contracts, verifiable records

17👍8🔥4👏2

12 Aug 2026, 08:40 UTC≈1,400 views35 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

AI Changes the Scale of Blockchain AI agents change the economics of digital interaction. Unlike human users, software can monitor systems continuously, trigger approved actions, and interact with applications at machine speed. That raises the infrastructure bar for every Layer 1. For ICB Network, scalability is not only about processing more transactions. It is about building an efficient foundation through dynami

👍1614🔥5

10 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC≈1,440 views32 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Security Is a Process, Not a Checkbox. A smart contract executes exactly what its code defines. That makes secure design, reliable inputs, testing, and validation essential, not optional. EVM compatibility gives developers access to familiar standards and tooling, but familiarity does not guarantee security. Contracts still require careful review, gas optimization, continuous monitoring, and clear governance throug

🔥1210👍10

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @icbnet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,034,837 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

موزیک المعمار 🕺🏽💃🏽
@musicmemarian · 42,252
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 29 August 2026
شهربيت - طلا | فارکس | کریپتو
@shahrbit · 45,075
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ICB Network” (@icbnet), 15,333 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/icbnet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.