Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Девочки, это база!

Channel

Девочки, это база!

@ice_crem74

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,366subscribers

-239 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001803959911
TypeChannel
Username@ice_crem74
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ice_crem74

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,36610,60510,485.57 August 2026 — 10,605 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,605 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,601 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,596 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,584 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,577 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,569 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,577 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,569 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,559 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,552 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,548 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,569 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,557 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,553 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,564 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,573 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,578 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,577 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,573 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,565 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,554 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,553 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,540 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,520 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,508 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,500 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,476 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,422 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,398 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,381 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,374 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,366 subscribers7 August 202616 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 40 days, net -239. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,330–10,641 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 12:2010,366-8
14 Sept 2026, 19:3910,374-7
13 Sept 2026, 03:5610,381-17
11 Sept 2026, 04:3810,398-24
8 Sept 2026, 08:4010,422-54
5 Sept 2026, 06:2010,476-24
3 Sept 2026, 13:1810,500-8
2 Sept 2026, 07:0210,508-12
1 Sept 2026, 10:0610,520-20
31 Aug 2026, 13:0210,540-13
30 Aug 2026, 13:0610,553-1
29 Aug 2026, 15:1210,554-11
28 Aug 2026, 16:0310,565-8
27 Aug 2026, 16:4410,573-4
26 Aug 2026, 15:3310,577-1
25 Aug 2026, 18:0310,578+5
24 Aug 2026, 17:3810,573+9
23 Aug 2026, 02:5910,564+11
21 Aug 2026, 14:5810,553-4
20 Aug 2026, 14:5810,557first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.49%
avg views ÷ 10,366 subscribers
Avg views / post
984
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held27 (30 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total12,795
Reactions total824
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
5s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,671 reactions across 27 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
55833.4%
❤‍🔥32419.4%
😍1398.32%
😁1116.64%
905.39%
🤪895.33%
👍674.01%
💯663.95%
🔥502.99%
432.57%
🤝261.56%
🙏251.50%
😱231.38%
🥰231.38%
💔201.20%
👌70.419%
👏50.299%
🤣30.18%
😢10.06%
😭10.06%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,671 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC584 views58 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Пока мы тут с вами решаем разумно ли сменять натуральные зубы на искусственные, настоятельно рекомендую сменить фокус на не менее привлекательное — гидрофильный бальзам от BHAB, который в один счет смывает с лица (да и не только) все что захотите: спф, мейк и даже плохую репутацию… Тут у нас и экстракт гриба чаги, и антиоксиданты, и гиалуроновая кислота, и даже биотики. В общем, все что нужно, чтобы очищение было не

32😍179

27 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC660 views13 reactionsread 29 August 2026

На самом деле, мое решение поставить виниры не совсем добровольное: здесь рассказала о первопричинах и возможных последствиях недоделанной ортодонтии…

💔84😢1

27 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC745 views44 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Как заставить женщину улыбаться во все тридцать два, 24 часа в сутки? Да все очень просто: примерьте ей макет ее будущих виниров… Получается, принимаю поздравления, либо соболезнования. Тут уже кто как относится к решению добровольно спилить здоровые зубы…

😱23🔥12👍8😭1

27 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC735 views46 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @elya_bulochka

Знаете, как понять, что не рассчитала бюджет на месяц? Начинаешь пить кофе с корицей по четвергам…

🤪27🤝76💯6

26 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC833 views62 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Спонсор роскошного цветочного сада у меня дома — День Рождения любимой пуговки! Словами не описать как я рада, что она есть в моей жизни! Моя маленькая девочка, которая за эти годы успела стать и моей самой большой любовью, и самым главным источником смеха, радости, гордости и конечно же, легко, а иногда и не очень, нервного тика… Я бесконечно благодарна судьбе за возможность быть твоей мамой, удивляться твоему хар

❤‍🔥3115😍12🙏4

26 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC776 views54 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Девочка: цветы и подарки на каждый праздник… Женщина: цветы и подарки на каждый праздник, даже если праздник вообще не ее…

❤‍🔥27😁12😍12💯3

25 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC910 views42 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😍1912🔥11

25 Aug 2026, 09:58 UTC922 views36 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Ой забыла еще сказать: не бойтесь этот тонер использовать в утренней рутине, даже наоборот — пользуйтесь в основном именно утром, потому что он такой офигенный глоуап дает, что даже макияж положиться как-то по особенному… А еще маленький лайфхак для большой экономии: вместо ватного диска, плюхайте тонер прямо в ладошки и только потом наносите на лицо. Эффект вы получите абсолютно тот же, зато теперь одной банки хват

1710❤‍🔥9

21 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC≈1,440 views111 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

А знаете, что меня расстраивает сильнее всего на самом деле? Это то, что я больше никогда в жизни не смогу впервые попробовать этот первоклассный тонер… Вы когда-нибудь видели, чтобы одна бьюти-банка решала несколько задач сразу? А я вот не только видела, но еще и умудрилась попробовать и теперь настоятельно рекомендую сделать это и вам! Увлажнение, мягкое отшелушивание, выравнивание рельефа и уменьшение пор — все э

50😍3229

20 Aug 2026, 17:22 UTC≈1,350 views72 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Факт остается фактом: если вас что-то расстраивает, пусть даже это маленькое количество любимого печенья в пачке выход только один — шопинг! Урвала офигенный костюм в стиле Коко по совершенно немыслимой низкой цене! И хоть погода позволит выгуливать его максимум один раз, зато радости сколько… 🏷️ 7.88

❤‍🔥3619👍13🔥4

20 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC≈1,310 views48 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Девочки, вот видите? Поэтому берите сразу 3 пачки! Мы тут все в легком недоумении, как можно было сделать такую вкуснотищу и положить всего 8 штук…

😁24❤‍🔥13👌7💯4

20 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC≈1,310 views90 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Говорят, больнее всего смотреть на губы, которые не можешь поцеловать. Но знали бы вы, как больно смотреть на вкуснючее, которое не можешь съесть… Хорошо, что к печенью от ProteinRex это вообще никак не относится. Потому что их новинка Рекс Пай, это буквально камбэк в юношество: глазурь, нежный бисквит и маршмеллоу — все как в далеком 2008-м… Только теперь это не та сладость из ближайшего ларька, после которой хотел

42❤‍🔥25🥰21😍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @ice_crem74. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Девочки, это база!” (@ice_crem74), 10,366 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ice_crem74.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.