В «Москва-Сити» силовики задержали более 20 работников криптообменников Сотрудники ФСБ и МВД закрыли девять пунктов обмена криптовалюты, работавших в бизнес-центре «Москва-Сити». По версии спецслужбы, через эти обменники якобы легализовались и выводились за границу деньги, похищенные украинскими телефонными мошенниками у россиян, в том числе пенсионеров. В ФСБ утверждают, что жертв убеждали покупать криптовалюту и …

Channel
КриптоЧасовой :: DeFi, крипта, блокчейн, альткойны, биткойн, майнинг, трейдинг, финтех
@icokaraulny
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,975subscribers
-13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001149547589 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @icokaraulny |
| Created | 19 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/icokaraulny |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “КриптоЧасовой :: IEO, крипта, блокчейн, альткойны, биткойн, майнинг, трейдинг, финтех” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:41 | 2,975 | +3 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 2,972 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:19 | 2,975 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:02 | 2,980 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 2,979 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 2,981 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 2,977 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 2,980 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 2,979 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:23 | 2,981 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 2,982 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 2,988 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:19 | 2,988 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
27 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤡 | 5 | 18.5% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 14.8% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 14.8% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 11.1% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 7.41% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 7.41% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 3.70% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 3.70% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 3.70% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 3.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Я думаю, что большинство из вас долларовые миллионеры. Вам просто нужно как-то вернуть всё, что вы в совокупности потеряли на ликвидациях.
👏1🤣1
Как AAVE возвращается на пьедестал Вчера Aave Labs выкатила готовое решение для необанков, кошельков и платёжек: подключай свои технологии, создавай стратегии и предлагай клиентам фиксированный процент по стейблам без своей DeFi-инфраструктуры с нуля. Для клиента это выглядит как обычный депозит: «5% по USDC» - кладёшь и не паришься. И довольными остаются все стороны сделки: если доходность уходит выше обещанного к…
👏2
Хочешь секрет про Trust Wallet? Только что мой друг рассказал мне забавную историю и у меня аж волосы на жопе зашевелились. Скриншоты доказательств я положу в комментариях под постом. Делал он недавно инкассатор для кассы: надо вытащить бабки с кучи приёмных кошельков в один. В такой логике есть вечная боль – газ для комиссиий. Откуда брать нативный токен на каждую коробочку? Скидывать заранее эфир/трон на каждый…
❤3👍2😍2💅1
Вот полное объявление об этом августовском биткоин хардфорке от девелопера https://x.com/truthcoin/status/2047639261453680838
Внезапно: хардфорк битка через месяц 🙀 https://news.bitcoin.com/bitcoins-august-hard-fork-may-dwarf-every-previous-split-combined-heres-why/
💩2
Сука, Сейлора жалко, надо было по 126 К продавать, но кто же знал, что в два раза битк рухнет 😖🙀😏
🤡2
#spcx #btc 🤯 Личное состояние Илона Маска больше рыночной капитализации Биткоина… Ранее: рост SpaceX Cryptо Headlines
Пипистер сделал ето 😲👍🏻
🤡2👏1
🇬🇪 В Грузии накрыли сервис по отмыванию $389,700,000 в крипте. ➤ В Грузии задержали предполагаемых администраторов группировки AudiA6 – сервиса, через который с 2022 года отмывали криптовалюту, связанную с киберпреступлениями, даркнетом и ransomware-атаками. ➤ По данным Минюста США, через кошельки AudiA6 прошло около 10,333 BTC на сумму примерно $389,7m. ➤ Схема работала как «прачечная»: преступники отправляли гря…
😱1
🤖 OpenAI’s confidential IPO filing signals a new phase in the AI boom ··· 5 articles OpenAI says it has filed confidential paperwork for a possible IPO, but the company may still stay private as it focuses on other priorities. Decrypt OpenAI has confidentially filed for a U.S. IPO as major AI companies head toward public markets, though the company has not disclosed the size or terms of the planned listing. Crypto.…
🤡1
SpaceX IPO - Every Way to Get Exposure Onchain SpaceX lists on Nasdaq as $SPCX on June 12 - a $1.75T–2T valuation and ~$75B raise, the largest IPO in history. Crypto now offers two ways in: buy at the IPO price via tokenized shares, or trade pre-IPO perps. Most IPOs reserve just 5–10% of shares for retail - SpaceX is setting aside 30%. At up to $2T, SpaceX would be the largest IPO ever - bigger than Saudi Aramco's …
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @icokaraulny. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@ICOmuzhik · 6,8987 postsКлимченко | про криптовалюту
@thevse · 35,3232 postsBlockchair News
@BlockchairNews · 3,2241 postРБК Крипто
@RBCCrypto · 132,4771 postКрипто твиты
@cryptotweet280 · 13,4301 postПервый отдел
@deptone · 52,2791 postHype Coin News
@hypecoinnews · 1,7911 postОндрей Гойчев (DFW Bals)
@ondreigoichev · 152,6411 postBell.Инвестиции
@thebell_invest · 15,3341 postTop 7 | Tech, AI & Crypto Analytics
@top7ico · 24,3931 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КриптоЧасовой :: DeFi, крипта, блокчейн, альткойны, биткойн, майнинг, трейдинг, финтех” (@icokaraulny), 2,975 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/icokaraulny.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.