Channel
info DFF
@ideadff
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,794subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 3 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001230207174 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ideadff |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ideadff |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 7,794 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 7,796 | +3 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 10:16 | 7,793 | -7 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 06:36 | 7,800 | no change |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 7,800 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@FinancialFaiz · 22,179
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 21 September 2026
@BursaKLSEsignals · 34,153
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 5 September 2026
@AsriAhmadAcademy · 33,940
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026
@mplusOTG · 26,335
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 12 September 2026
@TheGardenofAlQuran · 23,691
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 September 2026
@TradewithMaybank · 25,423
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“info DFF” (@ideadff), 7,794 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ideadff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.