Photo, posted without a caption
👍3❤1

Channel
@ideasbolsa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,005subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001179080807 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ideasbolsa |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ideasbolsa |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 10:22 | 2,005 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 20:18 | 2,006 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 2,008 | +2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 2,006 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 2,008 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 2,009 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:53 | 2,011 | no change |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 2,011 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 17 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
80 reactions across 17 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 36 | 45.0% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 27.5% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 13.8% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 6.25% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 3.75% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 2.50% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 1.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 17 December 2025 to 17 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
👍3❤1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍3
Este concepto - el de invertir en negocios de calidad en mercados de expansión y con amplios fosos defensivos - es también uno de los fundamentos de nuestra filosofía de inversión. Así evitamos dramas como el que le ha sucedido a iRobot, a la vez que logramos rentabilidades por encima del promedio mientras dormimos tranquilos.
👏13👍8❤7🔥3💯2❤🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍3
iRobot no tenía ninguna ventaja competitiva duradera, y su competencia pudo imitarlo todo: el producto, el servicio, la calidad y mejorar el coste. Esto ha sido en esencia lo que la ha dejado fuera de juego: la ausencia de foso defensivo.
👏5👍1
A mí me da mucha pena. ¿Y a vosotros?
😱5👍1
Sin embargo, toda la deuda que habían utilizado para dar a conocer el producto y desarrollarlo seguía ahí, creciendo.
👍1
Acto seguido, las ventas de iRobot empezaron a bajar
👍1
“En los negocios, busco castillos económicos protegidos por fosos infranqueables.” “Lo más importante para mí es averiguar cuán grande es el foso que rodea al negocio. Y lo que me encanta, por supuesto, es un gran castillo y un gran foso con muchas pirañas y cocodrilos.” “Un buen negocio es como un castillo fuerte con un foso profundo a su alrededor. Quiero tiburones en el foso para mantener alejados a quienes quie…
❤2👍1
Y esto nos conecta con el maestro Buffett: La vida de Warren Buffett ha pivotado alrededor de esta obsesión: encontrar los negocios con los mayores fosos defensivos del planeta y comprarlos a buenos precios. Porque al final, es lo único que hace que las empresas sobrevivan y reinen durante décadas, retribuyendo al accionista en forma de grandes rentabilidades. Tiene varias frases que resumen a la perfección esta f…
👍2
Este drama sucede a diario, con miles de empresas en bolsa. Y es causado por un denominador común: LA FALTA DE FOSO DEFENSIVO Y VENTAJAS COMPETITIVAS
👏4👍1
En resumen: Lograron entrar primeros en un nicho nuevo y con gran potencial con una propuesta excelente, y escalaron antes que nadie, logrando una extensa red de usuarios. Sin embargo, tuvieron que educar al mercado (caro), gastar mucho I+D en diseño y en madurar una tecnología hasta entonces inexistente: tuvieron que hacer el trabajo sucio. Y luego otros le copiaron - mejor y más barato - aprovechando todo lo que…
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @ideasbolsa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ideas de Inversión | Bolsa y Mercados” (@ideasbolsa), 2,005 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ideasbolsa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.