Чешутся руки приобрести мерч с мейном, но искать по сарафанному радио муторно? Вы в восторге от своей покупки и хотите написать отзыв о художнике? Хотите где-то пропиарить свои предзаказы на позиции? Вы по адресу - все перечисленное вы можете найти здесь! Добро пожаловать в конфешен, полностью посвященный авторскому мерчу по игре identity v. Здесь будут репоститься обновления физических полок, предзаказы авторских …

Channel
info | ITN
@identityv_info_itn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
129subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 5 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002231902029 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @identityv_info_itn |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 5 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/identityv_info_itn |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Oct 2026, 18:36 | 129 | +3 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 03:22 | 126 | no change |
| 5 Oct 2026, 02:47 | 126 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 12 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 26.7%
- avg views ÷ 129 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 34.5
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 11.1%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (12 May 2026 – 4 October 2026) |
| Views total | 69 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Oct 2026, 03:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
12 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🍓 | 12 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 4 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Привет-привет, давно не слышались, добро пожаловать в цирк уродов! Я давно не постила (хотя контент был) потому что саипала эта ебатория иденовская, но мимо этой ситуации я пройти не могу! Человек купил аккаунт на доверии, прошлый владелец которого — Сова. Казалось бы, хер бы с ним. Ан нет! Дражайший Сарвенк, к которому обратились люди, в силу своего чувства справедливости не смог пройти мимо, отказался ииии… покупа…
🍓6
Смерть обман кража вашего кошелька кошмар ужас не донатьте ложь Таких цен не существует и название дурацкое (срс, это фейковый сайт😭не верьте короче, берегите копеечку и юзайте проверенные временем сайты, ну например тем, что указан ниже) @IdvGOGO | Донат в игру❓| NONO News
Я уже начинаю сомневаться в их гарантских принципах при условии, что у них в сетке Армиту и всей бывшей вшивой администрации (почему вшивой, тут) пяточки лизать должны
Ребят, я все это постчу не сколько того, чтобы поугарать, а чтобы осветить то, что люди защищают скамера в прошлом и мразотного халата в настоящем ХАХАААХ Сетка уже не особо рабочая, а они все еще думают, что все, кто против скамеров, это мои подсосы… Кароче говоря — Армит скамер, хейт заслуженный, баны за реакции шизовые
ЕБАНУТАЯ ЖЫРУХА БАНИТ ЗА РЕАКЦИИ можешь дальше писать в мужском роде ты все равно останешься тупой телкой
Ура ребят всем спасибо соо снесли 🙂 Извините за в какой-то мере флуд, просто когда такое происходит, неоч приятно за родственников, данные которых тоже слили
Сразу отвечу на претензии «ты кидаешь фотографии человека, а потом жалуешься, что тебя сливают» Бл… ФОТКИ КОТОРЫЕ ГУЛЯЮТ ПО ИНТЕРНЕТУ ТРЕТИЙ ГОД ЭТО НЕ ТО ЖЕ САМОЕ ЧТО АДРЕС И НОМЕР ТЕЛЕФОНА) имхо
🍓2
Ого ребята хотите сплетни? Мой адрес и номер телефона слили в кондель за то, что я скинула фотку армита, которого дефают и запрещают оскорблять в сетке (скамера, ресера, халата и просто мерзкого человека, вымогавшего деньги) Причем людям настолько не за что уцепиться, что они срут меня за одну рофлофотку и за то что я фоткаюсь в камуфляже и с оружием типа ДЕВОЧКА ДОЛЖНА БЫТЬ ЖЕНСТВЕННОЙ ахахаха Но ладно я тут не за…
🍓2
🧙♂️Мы Союз Тульских Магов и вас всех настигнет кара небесная но сначала она настигнет администроров сетки idv trades а именно: - sarveng - блины - штирлиц - jiona , cutois (это один человек,мужчина армянин из прошлого) ⚡️ЗАТЕМ КАРА НЕБЕСНАЯ НАСТИГНЕТ И ВАС ДОРОГИЕ ЧИТАТЕЛИ⚡️ С уважением,Союз Тульских Магов
Без рофлов
❗️ липсиха получает предупреждение (1/3) ⏱ Будет снято через 1 месяц 👮 Модератор: Seth 💬 Причина: Без рофлов
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @identityv_info_itn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“info | ITN” (@identityv_info_itn), 129 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/identityv_info_itn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.