21 measurements spanning 22 days, net +10,304. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,713–58,716 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 21
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
3 Sept 2026, 13:35
52,210
-369
2 Sept 2026, 03:28
52,579
-396
1 Sept 2026, 00:58
52,975
-307
30 Aug 2026, 23:16
53,282
-349
29 Aug 2026, 22:34
53,631
-454
29 Aug 2026, 00:37
54,085
-644
27 Aug 2026, 23:28
54,729
-846
26 Aug 2026, 20:44
55,575
-948
26 Aug 2026, 00:02
56,523
+441
25 Aug 2026, 01:56
56,082
+1,198
23 Aug 2026, 17:47
54,884
+666
22 Aug 2026, 06:28
54,218
+1,336
20 Aug 2026, 20:02
52,882
+1,488
19 Aug 2026, 17:52
51,394
+656
18 Aug 2026, 18:34
50,738
+757
17 Aug 2026, 19:55
49,981
+1,106
16 Aug 2026, 16:23
48,875
+1,790
15 Aug 2026, 01:07
47,085
+2,172
13 Aug 2026, 14:07
44,913
+2,601
12 Aug 2026, 16:24
42,312
first reading
Engagement
150 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.0%
avg views ÷ 52,210 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,500
150 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.75%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
150
of 150 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
150 (9 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
1,722,118
Reactions total
81,833
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 20:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈9,770
Videos
≈2,010
Links
≈9,430
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 02m
Average length
47s
Measured directly from 80 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
81,833 reactions across 150 posts, in 56 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
13,373
16.3%
🤣
12,634
15.4%
😭
6,060
7.41%
❤
5,454
6.66%
😐
3,220
3.93%
😍
3,053
3.73%
❤🔥
2,881
3.52%
👏
2,656
3.25%
💔
2,405
2.94%
🤡
2,402
2.94%
👍
2,248
2.75%
🖕
1,958
2.39%
💩
1,852
2.26%
😨
1,844
2.25%
🤬
1,788
2.18%
🤯
1,644
2.01%
🤮
1,610
1.97%
💘
1,584
1.94%
🐳
1,515
1.85%
😢
1,366
1.67%
36 further kinds
10,286
12.6%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 150 of the 150 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81,833 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 150 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 150 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @idolstate. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 150 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
الکس گیبنی، کارگردان برندهی جایزهی اسکار، در مستندی به نام Musk به بررسی زندگی و مسیر قدرتمند شدن ایلان ماسک پرداخت. 👔🌟
گیبنی در گفتوگو با هالیوود ریپورتر دربارهی ماسک گفت که هر چقدر قدرت بیشتری به دست اورده، کمتر تمایل داشته که جلوی تمایلات بدش، گرفته بشه.
اون همچنین نقل کرد فردی که از نزدیک با ماسک کار کرده، اون رو بدبختترین آدمی که تا به حال دیده، توصیف کرده و معتقده که ماسک این بدبختی رو به اطرافیانش منتقل …
اخیرا تور گروه کتسای شروع شده و در همون اجراهای ابتدایی، دنیلا هنگام رقصیدن زمین میخوره اما خیلی سریع و حرفهای خودش رو جمعوجور میکنه. 🤩🤩
این حرکتش باعث شده که مورد تحسین قرار بگیره و خیلی ها به این نکته اشاره کنند که اون در اون لحظه درست مثل یک آرتیست حرفهای رفتار کرد.
☆ 𝙄𝘿𝙊𝙇 𝙎𝙏𝘼𝙏𝙀 › #daniela
لیسا عضو گروه بلک پینک اخیرا در مورد فرهنگ قرار گذاشتن در کیپاپ صحبت کرد که به خاطر صحبت هاش مورد انتقاد قرار گرفت. 🌟🌟
در فرهنگ کیپاپ ما نمیتونیم قرار بزاریم، اگه کسی ببینتت و پاپاراتزی ها پیدات کنن محبوبیتت کم میشه، وقتی جوونتر بودم چند باری تو رابطه رفتم اما مجبور بودیم قایمکی قرار بزاریم، نمیخواستم قرار گذاشتن من باعث بشه محبوبیت بلک پینک کم بشه.
☆ 𝙄𝘿𝙊𝙇 𝙎𝙏𝘼𝙏𝙀 › #lisa
در کنسرت شب گذشتهی گروه بی تی اس در لسآنجلس، جیهوپ عضو همین گروه از تتوی جدیدش که اسم فن های گروهشون (آرمی) هست و از کوریوگرافی آهنگ باتر از همین گروه الهام گرفته شده رو رونمایی کرد. 🩷🖤
☆ 𝙄𝘿𝙊𝙇 𝙎𝙏𝘼𝙏𝙀 › #jhope
ویدیوی وایرال شده از کارینا عضو گروه اسپا که وقتی دید طرفدار هاش زیر بارون منتظرش بودند و خیس شدند خودش هم اومد زیر بارون و در جواب این حرکتش گفت : «میدونستم که فن هام از صبح به خاطر من زیر بارون مونده بودند پس نمیخواستم بزارم تنهایی خیس بشند.» 💕😇
خیلی از کاربران اینترنتی گفتند که کارینا یک آیدل واقعا مهربونه و همیشه به فن هاش اهمیت داده و رفتار خوبی باهاشون داشته ولی داخل سوشال مدیا سعی میکنند اون رو یک آیدل پیک می …
پس از اعلام حضور کیم سوهیون به عنوان اهداکنندهی جایزه در مراسم The Fact Music Awards 2026 در 19 سپتامبر، حالا اعلام شده که اون در ماه دسامبر هم در مراسم Asian Artist Awards 2026 حضور خواهد داشت. 🤔❤️
حضور های عمومی پیاپی کیم سوهیون، انتظار ها برای بازگشت اون به فعالیت های داخلی رو بیشتر کرده.
☆ 𝙄𝘿𝙊𝙇 𝙎𝙏𝘼𝙏𝙀 › #kimsoohyun
ویدیوی وایرال شده از وونیونگ عضو گروه آیو که وقتی اعضای گروه به نوبت با فن ها صحبت میکنند، وونیونگ کلی ژست برای فن ها میگیره که خیلی ها بهش انتقاد کردند و گفتند اینکه وسط صحبت بقیه سعی کنی توجه بگیری خیلی پیک می طوره و وونیونگ باید این کار هاش رو متوقف کنه. 🩷🎀
یک سری از کاربران هم گفتند که اون واقعا آیدل آیدل هاست و تنها کسیه که به فن هاش اهمیت میده و بهشون توجه میکنه که حوصلشون سر نره و بقیهی دخترا فقط ایستادند و ه…
بر اساس گزارش های منتشر شده، گروه ایتیز با کامبکی در ماه نوامبر باز خواهند گشت. 🐱🎧
☆ 𝙄𝘿𝙊𝙇 𝙎𝙏𝘼𝙏𝙀 › #ateez
💋311🤣61🔥23❤🔥10
Showing the 12 most recent of 150 posts we hold for @idolstate. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@idolstate edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@idolstate named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@freebooks named in 1 post, 3 September 2026 – 3 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝗜𝗗𝗢𝗟 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗧𝗘” (@idolstate), 52,210 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/idolstate.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
