Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IELTS | Atabaev | 9.0

Channel

IELTS | Atabaev | 9.0

@ielts_atabaev

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,606subscribers

-875 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001994648394
TypeChannel
Username@ielts_atabaev
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ielts_atabaev

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

18,60619,48119,043.56 August 2026 — 19,481 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,481 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,478 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,450 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,440 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,407 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,396 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,380 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,366 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,323 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,305 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,278 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,288 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,284 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,277 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,272 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,239 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,189 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,141 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,062 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,046 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,024 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,032 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,013 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,996 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,970 subscribers3 September 2026 — 18,953 subscribers5 September 2026 — 18,900 subscribers8 September 2026 — 18,840 subscribers11 September 2026 — 18,783 subscribers13 September 2026 — 18,734 subscribers14 September 2026 — 18,707 subscribers16 September 2026 — 18,654 subscribers18 September 2026 — 18,606 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -875. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,475–19,612 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:1718,606-48
16 Sept 2026, 12:1918,654-53
14 Sept 2026, 15:2018,707-27
13 Sept 2026, 02:1718,734-49
11 Sept 2026, 02:5818,783-57
8 Sept 2026, 06:4018,840-60
5 Sept 2026, 03:1818,900-53
3 Sept 2026, 09:4518,953-17
2 Sept 2026, 00:5418,970-26
1 Sept 2026, 03:4918,996-17
31 Aug 2026, 01:1419,013-19
30 Aug 2026, 04:1519,032+8
29 Aug 2026, 05:2719,024-22
28 Aug 2026, 07:2519,046-16
27 Aug 2026, 04:1319,062-79
26 Aug 2026, 03:0119,141-48
25 Aug 2026, 00:0319,189-50
23 Aug 2026, 08:2319,239-33
21 Aug 2026, 21:2819,272-5
20 Aug 2026, 15:5619,277first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 5 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.8%
avg views ÷ 18,606 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,060
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held25 (5 May 202626 August 2026)
Views total8,120
Reactions total161
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 02:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
32m 25s
Average length
32m 25s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,574 reactions across 21 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥82022.9%
76921.5%
👍45412.7%
🎉3339.32%
🤣2707.55%
😭1865.20%
1644.59%
❤‍🔥1574.39%
🤯782.18%
💯671.87%
👏531.48%
🗿471.32%
🤔411.15%
👌230.644%
170.476%
🤩150.42%
🐳140.392%
😱120.336%
💔110.308%
🥰70.196%
10 further kinds361.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,574 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 03:57 UTC≈3,860 views102 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

IELTS Courses in Navoi 🇺🇿📚 Looking to improve your IELTS score with structured, focused preparation? 🎯 Join my IELTS courses — available both online and offline in Navoi. 📘 IELTS C1–C2 🗓 Monday • Wednesday • Friday 🕔 5:00 PM 📗 IELTS B2–C1 🗓 Monday • Wednesday • Friday 🕞 3:30 PM ⏳ Course duration: 5 months 📩 For more information: @atabaevlaziz

👍4222🤣20🔥8🗿3🤯2🥴21

24 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC≈4,260 views59 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥28😭15🤣93🥴2😢2

17 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC≈11,000 views120 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Why does grammar matter so much in IELTS? 🧠 Grammar isn’t just important for Writing and Speaking. It can directly affect your accuracy and speed in Reading and Listening too. - Tenses help you understand when something happened, especially when several events are mentioned. - Singular/plural forms can make the difference between a correct and incorrect answer. If the question requires “buildings” but you write “bu

61💯37💔115🔥3🎄2🕊1

7 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC≈9,710 views88 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Word formation mistakes in IELTS Writing A word formation mistake happens when you know the right word but use the wrong form of it. ❌ The government should focus on the develop of public transport. ✅ The government should focus on the development of public transport. ❌ The number of cars increased significant. ✅ The number of cars increased significantly. Think in word families: develop -> development -> develo

👍4329🔥12❤‍🔥31

5 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC≈14,300 views238 reactionsread 3 September 2026

One of the most underrated ways to improve your IELTS Listening and Reading is surprisingly simple: Do the tests without looking at the questions. Instead of constantly searching for answers, just focus on understanding. 🎧 For Listening, simply listen to the recording from beginning to end as if it were a podcast. 📖 For Reading, read the passage like you would read an interesting article. When you’re not distrac

❤‍🔥10967🔥3810👍7🌚3😍2🕊1

29 Jul 2026, 04:27 UTC≈13,400 views230 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Band 9.0 tip. If you feel like your vocabulary bank is good enough but you are still failing to get 9.0 in R and L, then what will help you master these modules is understanding how these tests are created. Seeing patterns and traps so to say. This comes naturally if your pattern recognition is strong, but if not, you might need to learn a few tricks. For example, one way you lose your points is that you listen and

👍102🔥6239💯176❤‍🔥2🤔2

17 Jul 2026, 03:00 UTC≈17,000 views116 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

#writing #mysample The graph compares the number of participants in five different activities at a social center in Melbourne, Australia, from 2000 to 2020. Overall, the graph indicates noticeable variations in the participation trends over the timeframe, with the film club consistently exhibiting the highest number of participants. Also, table tennis and musical performances saw significant rises, while amateur dra

6329🔥104🤯42🥰2👍1

22 May 2026, 07:00 UTC≈32,500 views148 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

This is one of my video lessons as part of Marathon 2.0. To access more of these, join my current Marathon 3.0 only for 100.000UzS.

842513👏7🤣7🤓6👍2🔥2

21 May 2026, 10:18 UTC≈29,000 views49 reactionsread 3 September 2026

The course starts tomorrow. Will be explaining how to ace pie charts. You can still join the course both with feedback or without it. @atabaevlaziz

👍30🔥134🤯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @ielts_atabaev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 May 2026, 09:22 UTCAnonymous Quiz507 voters

Does this statement agree with the claims of the writer? As expected, the artworks chosen for the exhibition reflect a narrow interpretation of landscape.

  1. Yes38%
  2. No48%
  3. Not Given14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 5 May 2026 to 26 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

IELTS 9.0 √Suhrobjon Abdivaliev
@writing_t · 34,716
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 September 2026
Writing Essays Band 9 | IELTS CEFR
@Writing_Essays_Band9 · 61,651
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
Cambridge IELTS practice |Official™
@cambridgematerials · 157,449
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Ozodbek's IELTS
@ozodbek_sk · 43,607
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
Ielts topic-based vocabulary
@topic_based_vocabulary · 24,232
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 September 2026
Jo’rabek Sanokulov | IELTS
@ieltswithsanokulov · 55,964
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Siroj notes | 8.5
@Siroj_Notes · 44,074
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
BM | IELTS 9.0
@BekzodMirahmedov · 43,728
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
IELTS Academy
@IELTS_8 · 56,662
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
My IELTS materials!
@IELTSmaterials_N1 · 33,326
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026
REAL EXAM | IELTS
@realexamielts · 34,839
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 2 September 2026
Alisher’s IELTS | 9.0
@alisher_abduvohobov · 100,344
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 28 August 2026
REAL EXAM PAPERS
@mindless_writer · 80,934
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
IELTS SPEAKING ASSISTANT APP QUESTIONS
@IELTS_Speaking_Assistant_App · 53,291
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
Cambridge Dictionary
@cambridge_dic · 48,243
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
IELTS Cambridge Practice
@cambridgepractice · 40,488
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 August 2026
IELTS CDI Report
@cdireport · 43,019
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 29 August 2026
IELTS Cambridge 1-18 Full Package Books
@IELTS_CAMBRIDGE1 · 141,563
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 August 2026
Dilshodbek Ravshanov (9.0)
@ieltsaidbydilshodbek · 24,165
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 September 2026
IELTS ZONE 9.0
@ieltszone_uz · 43,422
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
FasTrack IELTS
@IELTSFasTrack · 86,962
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
Multilevel Master Audios
@Multilevel_Listening_Audios · 22,155
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 September 2026
6 Minute English
@BBCs_6MinuteEnglish · 180,859
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
ENGLISH PODCAST 🎧 | Английский подкасты 🎧
@listening_english_podcast · 58,735
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 65 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IELTS | Atabaev | 9.0” (@ielts_atabaev), 18,606 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ielts_atabaev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.