Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Это пройдёт

Channel

Это пройдёт

@ietoproydet

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,965subscribers

+33 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001838800890
TypeChannel
Username@ietoproydet
Created17 November 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ietoproydet

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,9173,9693,9436 August 2026 — 3,932 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,932 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,930 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,932 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,928 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,917 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,935 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,940 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,935 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,932 subscribers4 September 2026 — 3,931 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,967 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,969 subscribers17 September 2026 — 3,965 subscribers3,9656 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net +33. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,909–3,977 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 07:553,965-4
13 Sept 2026, 11:013,969+2
9 Sept 2026, 04:393,967+36
4 Sept 2026, 00:213,931-1
31 Aug 2026, 20:543,932-3
29 Aug 2026, 03:383,935-5
26 Aug 2026, 04:223,940+5
23 Aug 2026, 11:343,935+18
16 Aug 2026, 19:343,917-11
13 Aug 2026, 14:173,928-4
10 Aug 2026, 14:573,932+2
7 Aug 2026, 05:273,930-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:473,932no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:583,932first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

347 reactions across 20 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁7621.9%
4813.8%
👍4813.8%
🔥4111.8%
267.49%
🕊246.92%
👻123.46%
🤪82.31%
❤‍🔥72.02%
🤣61.73%
🤩61.73%
🥴41.15%
🫡41.15%
👏30.865%
🤔30.865%
🤷30.865%
🍾20.576%
🎉20.576%
🐳20.576%
💊20.576%
16 further kinds205.76%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 347 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
154
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ietoproydet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC299 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Пока еще мимоходом проскакивает время от времени новость о якобы новом подвиде «спирализма»: мол, где-то (место варьируется) большая аггломерация ИИй выработала в своей среде некое «религиозное учение», «первую религию нечеловеческого разума». Уверен, на этот пост никто не отреагирует, а через полгода снова все взвинтятся по спирали сенсации и всеобщего интереса, в брызгах аналитиковых слюней и внимании федеральных к

6😁41👍1🕊1🙉1

7 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC286 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

[окончание] В сторителлинге счастливые совпадения (см. индийское кино) и случай играют важную роль, как в обычных сказках, между тем как в конспирологии любые случайности и совпадения исключены, потому что это противоречит корневой концепции самого явления и всех свойственных ему нарративов. #конспирология #современность #литература #психология

3👍31💯1🕊1

6 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC350 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А вот доктор Скотт Эбери, крупнейший специалист по психологии игр, автор и главред ряда психологических журналов, историк науки и идей, занялся сопоставлением конспирологии и сторителлинга – помимо истории, философии, психологии в изучении теорий заговора огромную роль играет то, что это – литературная, культурологическая традиция, одна из самых сильных в мировой истории. На великой и несчастной Руси со сторителлинго

5🔥5👍21🕊1🤔1

5 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC380 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А также вышел Вестник АИЭМ №20 (август 2026) В этом номере: отчеты о мероприятиях АИЭМ — всероссийская научно-практическая конференция «Религиоведение в РХГА. Многообразие форм религиозной идентичности в современном мире», круглый стол: «Астрология: наука или лженаука?», конференция «К 270-летию Московского университета: история химии и науки – традиции исследований и диалог поколений», конференция «Русский эзотериз

👍62🍓1👏1🕊1🥴1😁1

5 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC385 views17 reactions2 Starsread 8 August 2026

Уважаемые коллеги, приглашаем вас на научную встречу, посвящённую системному обзору современной конспирологии Дата и время: среда, 12 августа, 19:00 – 21:00. Формат: очный (г. Москва) и дистанционный (Zoom). Организаторы: ЦИЭМ совместно с сообществом «Круги». Доклад: «Конспирология — религия современности» Докладчик: Евгений Леонидович Кузьмишин — кандидат исторических наук, преподаватель РХГА, РГГУ, член совета

👍10🤔2❤‍🔥1💊1🕊1😁1😍1

5 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC386 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В день, когда Земля налетит на ось и все не приколоченное сущее воспарит в эмпиреи, лучше всего провести время с очевидной пользой.

🔥61❤‍🔥1🍾1👍1🕊1🥴1

4 Aug 2026, 21:14 UTC536 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Изучать конспирологию можно в поле философии, религиоведения, литературы и т.п. Эффективнее всего в современной профанированной занаукометрированной и коммерциализированной мировой системе заниматься исследованиями социологическими. Поэтому их больше всего. Их результаты проще всего продать корпорациям и государственным и общественным институциям под соусом «эффективного управления массами». Но и от них есть существе

👍11😐21🎉1👻1🕊1🥴1

4 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC504 views33 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Крупный эксперт по массоновству и начальник философских наук Анастасия Владиленовна Маслова рассуждает о том, что вряд ли знает наверняка. Прямо в сегодняшнем эфире «Говорит Москва». Потому что это только я много лет назад, еще до всяких ИИ, нашел в сети и опубликовал единственное верное изображение Того Самого «масонского ложа». Сайт этого инди-дизайн-бюро Crookedbrains с тех пор перестал открываться. #масонство #ко

😁22🤣3🐳211🌚1👍1👻1

4 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC480 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Между делом напоминаю, что у меня еще и другой канал есть — с диванными заметками об историческом и биографическом кино, кинотрендах и индустрии смешного. Так, ничего особенного и крайне длинно. На любителя. Но местами ничего себе.

6🕊2🤩2🎉1👌1

3 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC622 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Кстати, не советую забывать о том, что уже скоро, через девять дней, 12 августа 2026 г. в 17.33 по московскому времени Земля на 7 секунд потеряет гравитацию в соответствии с операцией ЦРУ и АНБ «Проект Якорь» (Project Anchor), направленной на искусственное слияние и перехлест энергий двух могущественных черных дыр. Что бы ни говорили в сети про социально активную мэрилендскую тетку «fiery_by_nature» и анонимных польз

👻8😁7🫡32👍21❤‍🔥1🕊1

2 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC585 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Информативно, не очень длинно и по делу. Целая тематическая статья, почему Рихард Вагнер не был масоном и почему многие так думают. Если вкратце, то а) он очень мистический, б) в музей Вагнера в Байрейте нельзя пройти иначе, как минуя местную ложу с музеем масонства, и это откладывается на подкорке у всех посетителей, в) Ингмар Бергман вложил в своей телеверсии «Волшебной флейты» (1979) в руки Зарастро партитуру «Пар

🔥6👍311🕊1😁1

2 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC547 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

[окончание] Фойстель и его друзья опасались, что членство Вагнера в масонстве может привести к разрыву с Людвигом II Баварским, католичнейшим королем очень католического королевства и, следовательно, лояльным Папе, который еще в 1738 году угрожал отлучением от церкви любому католику, вступающему в масонство. Другие причины, такие как образ жизни Вагнера или его антисемитские высказывания, также могли повлиять на это

🔥7👍31👏1🕊1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ietoproydet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Новости истории и археологии
@arch_history_news · 24,779
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Fire walks with me
@chaoss_flame · 52,306
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Это пройдёт” (@ietoproydet), 3,965 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ietoproydet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.