Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for مبادرة تعلم أحكام الزكاة

Channel

مبادرة تعلم أحكام الزكاة

@ifacademyzakat

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,963subscribers

-695 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001767474065
TypeChannel
Username@ifacademyzakat
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ifacademyzakat

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

15,96316,65816,310.57 August 2026 — 16,658 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,650 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,635 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,617 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,605 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,585 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,569 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,553 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,533 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,519 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,507 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,500 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,477 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,451 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,419 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,391 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,375 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,361 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,354 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,347 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,339 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,326 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,315 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,304 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,289 subscribers4 September 2026 — 16,266 subscribers6 September 2026 — 16,230 subscribers9 September 2026 — 16,185 subscribers11 September 2026 — 16,164 subscribers13 September 2026 — 16,136 subscribers15 September 2026 — 16,107 subscribers17 September 2026 — 16,077 subscribers25 September 2026 — 15,963 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 49 days, net -695. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,859–16,762 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 22:0015,963-114
17 Sept 2026, 07:1716,077-30
15 Sept 2026, 07:2116,107-29
13 Sept 2026, 15:5916,136-28
11 Sept 2026, 21:1616,164-21
9 Sept 2026, 10:3616,185-45
6 Sept 2026, 01:3916,230-36
4 Sept 2026, 00:0016,266-23
2 Sept 2026, 13:1416,289-15
1 Sept 2026, 16:2716,304-11
31 Aug 2026, 18:3616,315-11
30 Aug 2026, 21:3316,326-13
29 Aug 2026, 21:5716,339-8
28 Aug 2026, 19:4716,347-7
27 Aug 2026, 20:1116,354-7
26 Aug 2026, 20:5716,361-14
25 Aug 2026, 23:5516,375-16
24 Aug 2026, 23:4616,391-28
23 Aug 2026, 09:2716,419-32
22 Aug 2026, 00:1716,451first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 1 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.16%
avg views ÷ 15,963 subscribers
Avg views / post
25.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held29 (1 June 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total51
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤375.0%
👍125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 19:01 UTC10 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @IFAcadbahrainPhoto

حييتم يا كِرام للقاء التفاعلي الثالث والثلاثين (المحاضرة 02 من سلسلة شرح القواعد الحاكمة للمالية الإسلامية من خلال كتاب الأشباه والنظائر للإمام السيوطي) للدكتــــــــــــــور: أحمد عمر الأهدل 🔗 رابط اللقاء على منصة اليوتيوب: https://youtube.com/live/8KjDn7Kno_4?feature=share 🔗 رابط اللقاء على منصة الزووم: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84508275901?pwd=n22iOaEmcKOxhdabRBmQiY5Jzb8Fxi.1 🔗 رابط استمارة تسجيل الحضور: http…

28 Aug 2026, 11:36 UTC41 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @IFAcadbahrainPhoto

➿تتقدم إدارة معهد المالية الإسلامية بخالص الشكر والتقدير لمن أتمّ حضور 30 لقاءً تفاعليا، وتعلن عن تقديم مكافأة خاصة لهم؛ عرفانًا باجتهادهم وتفاعلهم المثمر مع المحاضرين، ونسأل الله أن يبارك في جهودكم. ➿ونهيب ببقية الطلاب والطالبات الحرص التام على حضور هذه اللقاءات النافعة، لما فيها من الفائدة العظيمة. ➿كرما من الأعضاء المذكورة أسماؤهم التواصل عبر البوت الإداري للمعهد، دونكم الرابط: https://t.me/IFAcad_bot 🔗أو عبر …

❤1

26 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC40 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @IFAcadbahrainPhoto

حييتم يا كِرام للقاء التفاعلي الثاني والثلاثين (المحاضرة 03 من سلسلة مباحث مختارة من فقه المعاملات) للدكتــــــــــــــور: علـــــــي النمـــــــر 🔗 رابط اللقاء على منصة اليوتيوب: https://youtube.com/live/_f1H7AF1Jtc?feature=share 🔗 رابط اللقاء على منصة الزووم: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84508275901?pwd=n22iOaEmcKOxhdabRBmQiY5Jzb8Fxi.1 🔗 رابط استمارة تسجيل الحضور: https://forms.gle/3XefnmYqEnrxogSv9 جَوَّد الله…

26 Aug 2026, 10:05 UTC32 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @IFAcadbahrainPhoto

حياكم الله يا كــــــــرام✨ يسعدنا أن نلتقيكم مجددًا مع اللقاء التفاعلي الثاني والثلاثين (المحاضرة 03 من سلسلة مباحث مختارة من فقه المعاملات). للدكتــــــــــــــور: علـــــــي النمـــــــر ⏱الساعــــــــــــــة: 10:00م بتوقيت مكة مفاجآت خاصة لحاضري اللقاءات التفاعلية: ▫️الحصول على مقعد في دبلوم فقه ومحاسبة زكاة الشركات عند حضور 40 لقاء. ▫️الحصول على مقعد في الدورة التأهيلية لشهادة الكفاءة في المعايير الشرعية ع…

23 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC35 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @IFAcadbahrainPhoto

القيمة العلمية للمعايير الشرعية وأسباب الثقة بها ➿تستمد المعايير الشرعية قيمتها العلمية الرفيعة من كونها مشروعًا علميًّا عالميًّا متكاملًا، أُنشئ لمعالجة النوازل المالية المعاصرة من خلال اجتهاد جماعي مؤسسي يجمع بين التأصيل الفقهي الدقيق والخبرة التطبيقية، ولا تنبع الثقة في هذه المعايير من الجهة التي أصدرتها فحسب، بل من المنهجية العلمية المحكمة والتحرير الفقهي العميق الذي قامت عليه بنودها وأحكامها. وتقوم القيمة العلم…

21 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC52 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @IFAcadbahrainPhoto

حييتم يا كِرام للقاء التفاعلي الحادي والثلاثين (المحاضرة 02 من سلسلة قضايا معاصرة في المالية الإسلامية) للدكتــــــــــــــور: محمد عود الفزيع 🔗 رابط اللقاء على منصة اليوتيوب: https://youtube.com/live/AQJoyY2_Vng?feature=share 🔗 رابط اللقاء على منصة الزووم: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84508275901?pwd=n22iOaEmcKOxhdabRBmQiY5Jzb8Fxi.1 🔗 رابط استمارة تسجيل الحضور: https://forms.gle/3XefnmYqEnrxogSv9 جَوَّد الله الس…

👍1

12 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC96 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @IFAcadbahrainPhoto

موعدنا اليــــــــــــــوم مع اللقاء التفاعلي التاسع والعشرين، المحاضرة 02 من سلسلة شرح عقود التمويل من كتاب الجامع في المعاملات المالية المعاصرة للدكتــــــــــــــور: عبدالله عويد الرشيدي| أستاذ الفقه المقارن المشارك وخبير ومدرّب مُعتمد في المالية الإسلامية. ⏱الساعــــــــــــــة: 8:15 م بتوقيت مكة مفاجآت خاصة لحاضري اللقاءات التفاعلية: ▫️الحصول على مقعد مجاني في دبلوم فقه ومحاسبة زكاة الشركات عند حضور 40 لقاء.…

8 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC92 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @drabdulbarimashalPhoto

حلول للمداينات المؤجلة في حالات التضخم الجامح للمداينات المؤجلة في حالات التضخم حلول منها: 1️⃣ مسألة رد الديون بالقيمة، تلح بين الحين والآخر عندما يحصل انخفاض نوعي في قيمة العملة الوطنية. 2️⃣ إطلاق الرد بالقيمة محل بحث كبير جدًا، ولا يوجد فتوى معاصرة واحدة تجيز ذلك على إطلاقه، والجماهير قديمًا وحديثًا على عدم الجواز. 3️⃣ اللوازم الفاسدة على القول بالرد بالقيمة مطلقًا، وأولها جهالة الأثمان والديون الثابتة في الذمة …

7 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC61 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @IFAcadbahrainPhoto

كيف ساهمت المعايير الشرعية في توحيد التطبيقات المالية الإسلامية؟ ➿كان تعدد المرجعيات الشرعية واختلاف الفتاوى بين الهيئات الشرعية في المؤسسات المالية الإسلامية أحد أبرز التحديات التي واجهت نمو الصناعة المالية الإسلامية وتوسعها. ➿فقد كان الاختلاف في تكييف العقود، أو في شروط صحتها، أو في آليات تطبيقها يؤدي إلى تفاوت ملحوظ بين المنتجات المالية من مؤسسة إلى أخرى، ويجعل المقارنة بينها أكثر صعوبة، كما يرفع من تكلفة الالتزا…

4 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC55 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @IFAcadbahrainPhoto

حييتم يا كِرام للقاء التفاعلي السادس والعشرين (المحاضرة 01 سلسلة شرح القواعد الحاكمة للمالية الإسلامية من خلال كتاب الأشباه والنظائر للإمام السيوطي) للدكتـــــــور: أحمد عمر الأهدل 🔗 رابط اللقاء على منصة اليوتيوب: https://youtube.com/live/qMVdffNgxdA?feature=share 🔗 رابط اللقاء على منصة الزووم: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84508275901?pwd=n22iOaEmcKOxhdabRBmQiY5Jzb8Fxi.1 🔗 رابط استمارة تسجيل الحضور: https://forms…

2 Aug 2026, 03:00 UTC74 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @IFAcadbahrainPhoto

حياكم الله يا كــــــــرام✨ موعــــــــدنا اليـــــــوم مع اللقاء التفاعلي الخامس والعشرين (المحاضرة 03 من سلسلة مقدمة في مقاصد الشريعة الإسلامية في المعاملات المالية المعاصرة). للشيـــــــخ: أحمـــــــد زيـــــــن العابديـــــــن ⏱الساعــــــــــــــة: 10:00م بتوقيت مكة مفاجآت خاصة لحاضري اللقاءات التفاعلية: ▫️الحصول على مقعد مجاني في دبلوم فقه ومحاسبة زكاة الشركات عند حضور 40 لقاء. ▫️الحصول على مقعد مجاني في ا…

31 Jul 2026, 11:02 UTC84 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @IFAcadbahrainPhoto

المعايير الشرعية والاجتهاد الجماعي: ثمرة العمل المؤسسي ‏➿تُعد المعايير الشرعية الصورة الأبرز للاجتهاد الفقهي الجماعي في العصر الحديث، فهي ليست نتاج رأي فردي أو اجتهاد فقيه واحد، وإنما ثمرة عمل مؤسسي منظم شارك فيه نخبة من كبار علماء الشريعة المتخصصين في فقه المعاملات المالية. ➿ويتجسد هذا الاجتهاد الجماعي في المجلس الشرعي الذي يضم عددًا من العلماء المتخصصين الذين يمثلون مذاهب فقهية متعددة، وينتمون إلى بيئات علمية وجغر…

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @ifacademyzakat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

💎الطَــツـرِيِـقُ إلى اْلْجَنَّـــةِ🎯
@JANNAH2015 · 46,534
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مبادرة تعلم أحكام الزكاة” (@ifacademyzakat), 15,963 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ifacademyzakat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.