ОНА СДЕЛАЛА СТИКЕРПАК ИЗ МОИХ КОММИШЕК СМУЩАЕТ АА
custom 523592852241699046612custom 52538515970368629475custom 53506480781456932111

Channel
@iffzetta2nd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
196subscribers
+33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003863301798 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iffzetta2nd |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iffzetta2nd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:01 | 196 | +7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:41 | 189 | +5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 184 | +8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 176 | +9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 167 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 163 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 163 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
414 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5235928522416990466 | 143 | 34.5% | |
| custom 5422657864902662420 | 87 | 21.0% | |
| custom 5253851597036862947 | 72 | 17.4% | |
| custom 5350648078145693211 | 62 | 15.0% | |
| custom 5415643414509164370 | 50 | 12.1% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 414 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ОНА СДЕЛАЛА СТИКЕРПАК ИЗ МОИХ КОММИШЕК СМУЩАЕТ АА
custom 523592852241699046612custom 52538515970368629475custom 53506480781456932111
большое спасибо моей постояннице за то что каждый раз меня финансирует когда у меня полная жопа с деньгами я ей 4 коммишки всё ещё должна кстати... артблок закончится — ультану
custom 523592852241699046610custom 52538515970368629478custom 54156434145091643704custom 54226578649026624202custom 53506480781456932111
че ещё я вчера пыталась заставить себя рисовать хотябы для себя в попытках нарисовать дизайн костюма ведь лучше всего у меня всегда выходят дизайны костюма в итоге я бросила работу спустя полчаса как только намолевала базу ну рендер лица тоже такой прикольный вышел, ладно
custom 52359285224169904666custom 53506480781456932116custom 54156434145091643703
я сделала мем с любимкой
custom 53506480781456932118custom 52359285224169904664custom 54156434145091643703
когда будете морально поддерживать художника который «рисует ради реакций» или «конкретного сообщества» никогда НИКОГДА не говорите «бро, рисуй для себя» потому что для художника это звучит как прямое издевательство, даже если вы пытались поддержать и помочь. Это так не работает. У меня сейчас лютый артблок наложившийся на депрессивную фазу. Я в отчаянии рисую для себя, потом для коммишек, потом для фандомов. И ниче…
custom 525385159703686294716custom 542265786490266242010custom 52359285224169904665
пошла коммишки на порно рисовать че ещё остаётся
custom 542265786490266242010custom 54156434145091643703custom 53506480781456932112
я пыталась я пыталась нихуя не получалось ручкой по сто́лу ба-бах настроение идёт нах
custom 542265786490266242012custom 54156434145091643705custom 53506480781456932112
как меня бесит вот это вот в артблоке когда отчаянно пытаешься работать и рисовать красиво для людей а получается хуета на которую ты зря часы работы тратишь я щас стол разхуярю
custom 542265786490266242013custom 53506480781456932112
о кстати, вот ещё кусочек коммишки!!
custom 523592852241699046615custom 52538515970368629475custom 53506480781456932115
короче ролила с дипсиком за свою Ос и в голову пришла идея создать АУ где она оверлорд а не простой грешник ну немного сьюшимся от скуки, че нет
custom 542265786490266242013custom 52359285224169904669custom 52538515970368629475custom 53506480781456932112custom 54156434145091643702
ого че под чем я вчера была...
custom 523592852241699046612custom 54226578649026624206custom 53506480781456932112
спидпеинт
custom 523592852241699046613custom 53506480781456932113custom 54156434145091643703
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @iffzetta2nd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“iFFZetta щитпостит творчество” (@iffzetta2nd), 196 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iffzetta2nd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.