Channel
@ifwecould
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
745subscribers
+21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001593147480 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ifwecould |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ifwecould |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 745 | +2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:34 | 743 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 738 | +4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 734 | +7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 727 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 725 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 724 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:19 | 724 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
420 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 226 | 53.8% | |
| 🔥 | 114 | 27.1% | |
| 😁 | 34 | 8.10% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 5.00% | |
| 💯 | 20 | 4.76% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 1.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 420 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Детская песня о diversity, как сейчас модно говорить: о том, мы можем быть разных цветов и размеров, передвигаться каждый по-своему, и это не главное, а главное – быть веселым и отважным. Какой-нибудь диснеевский мультик? Нет, внезапно советский:)) https://youtu.be/YgFjb7ivEX8?is=NqUQ_Iz3WEm0ejz-
🔥6👍4💯4
File, posted without a caption
🔥5❤3💯1
⏪⏪Второй выпуск!⏩⏩ В эти 4 минуты мы с моей кошкой (она тоже записывалась) мурчим/говорим о теле: ◽️о цикличности телесных процессов ◽️о том, как они вписаны в большой природный цикл ◽️как жить, когда телесные ритмы подводят
🔥8👍1💯1
случайно увидела, что про меня написали в «Снобе» АААААаааа https://snob.ru/society/kazhdyi-imeet-pravo-znat-chto-delat-esli-vy-predpolagaete-u-sebia-autizm/
❤30🔥18💯2👍1
Наблюдала на улице за мальчиком (ему было года 2). Он буквально захлебывался криком, чуть не лопался, топал ножками – 10 минут без перерыва. Ор стоял на всю улицу. а) как он не устает б) как в нем помещается столько воздуха, думала я. Его мама стояла рядом. Спокойно говорила что-то, потом молчала, потом снова говорила. И потом мальчик перестал кричать. Она взяла его на руки. 10 минут это длилось – как минимум. А это…
❤37💯6😢5
рубрика «кусочки романа» *** «Какое-то время они сидели молча. Дети, запрокинув головы, вместе с Эриком рассматривали темное небо. – Так много звезд, – показала пальцем Варя, – даже Млечный Путь немного видно. – Это облака. – Рома, не душни. – Нет, ну звезд правда очень много, – примирительно сказал Рома, – только многие уже померли. – Рома! – Ну а что? Эрик Искандерович, скажите ей. Свет идет сто лет, а звез…
❤15👍3💯2
File, posted without a caption
🔥13❤3💯1
⏪⏪Первый выпуск!⏩⏩ В эти 5 минут я рассказываю: ◽️почему у канала такое название ◽️при чем тут поэзия и татуировки ◽️почему радость иногда пугает не меньше, чем страдание Буду рада откликам. И если вы захотите, чтобы в следующий раз я поговорила о чем-то конкретном – тоже пишите:)
❤13
Решение о подкасте было принято единогласно 😁 и подкаст готовится А пока «расскажите что-нибудь про рыбов»
🔥15😁11❤6
У меня появилась идея: записывать тут подкасты на ~5-10 минут, где я болтаю-рассуждаю про психологию и жизнь.
Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.
🔥9😁9❤2
Радость неизбежна pinned «Мы запускаем курс о психотерапии аутичных взрослых! 😃 В курсе 8 занятий на разные темы – от устройства аутичной нервной системы до диагностики и терапии. Вместе с теорией будет много практики: дисуссии, разбор случаев и мастерская в конце. Например, мы…»
Мы запускаем курс о психотерапии аутичных взрослых! 😃 В курсе 8 занятий на разные темы – от устройства аутичной нервной системы до диагностики и терапии. Вместе с теорией будет много практики: дисуссии, разбор случаев и мастерская в конце. Например, мы обсудим: • за счет чего работает терапия аутичного человека (чтобы лучше в этом разобраться, мы провели несколько десятков интервью с реальными людьми) • с чем такие…
❤14🔥8👍5😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ifwecould. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
У меня появилась идея: записывать тут подкасты на ~5-10 минут, где я болтаю-рассуждаю про психологию и жизнь.
Results were not being shown when we read this poll, so no share was published for any option. That is not zero — it is an absence, and we record it as one.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Радость неизбежна” (@ifwecould), 745 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ifwecould.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.