Channel
@igorwinogradowww
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
64subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002411475412 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @igorwinogradowww |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/igorwinogradowww |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 64 | -2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 66 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 70 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 71 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 72 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:19 | 72 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 25 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
10 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🆒 | 6 | 60.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2025 to 2 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Последний месяц лета, каким он будет? Я всё так же ожидаю закономерный откат, который позволит остудить рынок и показать сомневающимся, что «бетховен уже фсё» (нет) 10% - умеренный откатик 15-20%- хардкорный вариант Хорошо, если разгрузка случится в августе и тогда мы с чистой совестью войдём в осенний сезон повышенной волатильности
👍1
Инвестиционные депозиты получены ✅🤝 Кто готов инвестировать и зарабатывать вместе с нами? Отправьте заявку на инвестиции ✍️
🆒3
Photo, posted without a caption
Увеличивайте свой капитал с лучшей и самой надежной торговой платформой fxtm Это законно и безопасно💸 Выплаты 💯%💸 💰Автоматические выводы средств круглосуточно💯 💰Лучшие инвестиционные планы 💰Круглосуточная поддержка в онлайн-чате💯 📣📣📣Минимальная сумма инвестиций: 300 долларов Многократно зарабатывайте без страха Присоединяйтесь сегодня, чтобы начать зарабатывать! Зарегистрироваться Самая быстрая система выплат 💸💸💸💸…
🆒1
локальные прогнозы по альтам! все таки думаю за рост локально!
🔍Поисковые запросы Google по слову “Stablecoin” достигли исторических максимумов Это может быть связано с их растущей популярностью в DeFi и глобальных платежах, особенно на фоне недавних новостей о поддержке криптовалют крупными платформами. @igorwinogradowww_private
Если собираем много реакций(пойму, что вам действительно интересно), то я расскажу как с помощью данного сервиса вы на легке сможете выйти на доход 10,000$/мес 🤝 P.s. 10к$ - это не предел. Моя близкая подруга за 3 месяца вышла на доход 25к$+/мес. Всего за 3 месяца, Карл!
❤2🆒1
✨Стоимость BTC при перераспределении богатства На текущий момент мировое богатство составляет $454 трлн, из которых BTC занимает 0,5% ($2,35 трлн). Если доля BTC вырастет: ➡1% — цена достигнет $228,000 за монету. ➡2% — стоимость поднимется до $457,000. ➡5% — BTC может стоить $1,14 млн.
👍1
Никогда не поздно начать инвестировать. 💰📈✨ Инвестирование — это мудрый подход к обеспечению своего финансового будущего. Начав с небольшой суммы, вы позволите своим деньгам приносить вам больше прибыли. 💰💡🌟 Инвестирование доступно не только тем, у кого есть значительные средства; любой может и должен задуматься об инвестировании. 🧑💼🌟🌱 Вы можете начать процесс, имея небольшую сумму и обширные знания. 📚💡🚀 Разработав …
🆒1
Мы продолжаем двигаться. Инвестирование — это движе🔑
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @igorwinogradowww. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@igorwinogradowww named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“lhor Vynohradov” (@igorwinogradowww), 64 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/igorwinogradowww.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.