Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for iHOLD.PRO 🔐

Channel

iHOLD.PRO 🔐

@iholdpro

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,290subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001712315199
TypeChannel
Username@iholdpro
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/iholdpro

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 37% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,2891,2971,2937 August 2026 — 1,297 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,297 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,295 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,293 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,292 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,290 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,289 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,290 subscribers1,2907 August 20267 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 31 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,288–1,298 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 12:391,290+1
27 Aug 2026, 00:431,289-1
23 Aug 2026, 19:471,290-2
20 Aug 2026, 12:121,292-1
17 Aug 2026, 17:141,293-2
14 Aug 2026, 12:581,295-2
7 Aug 2026, 22:331,297no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:101,297first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
57s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

49 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1326.5%
👍1122.4%
💯1020.4%
48.16%
😁48.16%
36.12%
👏24.08%
🏆12.04%
🤝12.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 January 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 10:15 UTC4 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @upscale_news_ruPhoto

🔥 Пройди челлендж – получи второй счет бесплатно Один неудачный день может отправить тебя в начало. Но не сегодня. Только 24 часа – дополнительная защита от дневной просадки и бесплатный новый счет после перехода на фандед. 🎁 Как это работает? 1️⃣ Купи один или несколько счетов во время акции 2️⃣ Получи защиту от дневной просадки (для Базовых и Ускоренных счетов) 3️⃣ Проходи челленджи и переходи на фандед 4️⃣ П

13 Jul 2026, 09:19 UTC11 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gusevself

🔜 Я ранее вам рассказывал про этот бот как SMM-инструмент для блогеров, разработчиков и предпринимателей. Теперь в нём появилась интеграция нового инструмента, точнее даже двух. Это кросс-постинг + контент-завод работающий через AI/LM API и OpenRouter. Можете попробовать, на до конца июля, функционал бесплатный.

11 Jul 2026, 13:12 UTC29 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ВАЖНО & ИНТЕРЕСНО Проп-трейдинг: https://t.me/UpscaleTradeBot/?startapp=eyJyZWZDb2RlIjoiSTZKNlUifQ Недавно в лс попросили рассказать «Сигналы не работают, а денег на новый депозит уже нету, что делать?» И решил я это осветить тут И это не единичный случай. Таких историй - десятки Именно поэтому зачастую из крипты и уходят И вот здесь возникает логичный вопрос: как торговать и набираться опыта, не рискуя своими послед

1👍1🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 17:22 UTC41 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всем Привет! И почему я не знал этого способа торговать большим депозитом за небольшие небольшие💰 деньги! Кто еще не знает что такое Проп - трейдинг советую срочно ознакомиться 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 https://t.me/UpscaleTradeBot/?startapp=eyJyZWZDb2RlIjoiSTZKNlUifQ

1🔥1🤝1

30 May 2026, 19:32 UTC93 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://ihold.pro/referral/ae6dzm8wbn У нас на сайте заработала рефералка, на сегодняшний день это единственная возможность заработать iHOLD Token 👀

29 Apr 2026, 08:57 UTC62 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptotweet280Photo

🚀 Экосистема RWA на блокчейне Solana достигла нового исторического максимума: общая стоимость токенизированных активов превысила $2,5 млрд. ⭐️ - поддерживайте канал реакцией ✔️ - подпишитесь на Крипто Сливы

1

9 Apr 2026, 17:22 UTC139 viewsread 7 August 2026

Все готовятся к Нашему старту 🔥💹

9 Apr 2026, 17:22 UTC80 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚀 The TON blockchain just got upgraded and is now 10× faster. ⚡️ Block rate increased 6×. ⏱ Transactions are now instant, subsecond. 🪙 This was step 1 of 7 to Make TON Great Again (MTONGA). Next step: cut the already low transaction fees by 6×. ✂️

1

7 Apr 2026, 16:07 UTC148 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Готовим платформу iHOLD.PRO к коммерческому запуску! Ищем партнеров👀

4 Mar 2026, 11:00 UTC160 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Ждем разворота рынка;)💹🔥

🔥42💯2

15 Jan 2026, 15:20 UTC127 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @iHOLD_CEO

Сегодня приняли решение, до выхода нашего токена iHOLD на биржу 2,5-3 месяца💪🏼 Точную дату мы не можем пока публично разглашать! Цена на бирже будет со старта выше чем на первом и втором инвест раундах, это тоже согласованно! П.С. Биржа обещает что будет удвоена наша собственная ликвидность , так что готовимся к запуску не только платформы iHOLD.PRO, но и нашего собственного инструмента управления доверием и стату

👍10💯7🔥71🏆1

10 Jan 2026, 20:21 UTC140 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rengev_cryptoPhoto

📦 Стикеры — самый масштабный скам ever Давно хотел поднять тему, но постоянно откладывал. Для многих из вас это очевидно, но все же стикеры, это самый наглый скам. Вокруг этого рынка собралось более 5 маркетов, которые еженедельно клепают новые наборчики, и неведомым мне образом они успешно сейлят этот хлам. Давайте проясним! Telegram подарки и стикеры как медиа ничем не отличаются, это все векторные анимации. Но

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iholdpro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“iHOLD.PRO 🔐” (@iholdpro), 1,290 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iholdpro.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.