Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for فوائد ابن القيم

Channel

فوائد ابن القيم

@iilllii7

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,986subscribers

+362 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001994182365
TypeChannel
Username@iilllii7
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/iilllii7

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,62410,98610,8058 August 2026 — 10,624 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,627 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,638 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,657 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,674 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,672 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,695 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,716 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,726 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,738 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,744 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,757 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,754 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,780 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,791 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,792 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,800 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,812 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,824 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,826 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,835 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,843 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,858 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,865 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,876 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,885 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,902 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,929 subscribers14 September 2026 — 10,945 subscribers16 September 2026 — 10,960 subscribers18 September 2026 — 10,986 subscribers8 August 202618 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 41 days, net +362. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,570–11,040 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 23:4110,986+26
16 Sept 2026, 17:4010,960+15
14 Sept 2026, 18:3910,945+16
13 Sept 2026, 04:5710,929+27
11 Sept 2026, 04:5710,902+17
8 Sept 2026, 05:3710,885+9
5 Sept 2026, 00:1610,876+11
3 Sept 2026, 10:0210,865+7
2 Sept 2026, 06:0410,858+15
1 Sept 2026, 02:4710,843+8
31 Aug 2026, 01:4710,835+9
30 Aug 2026, 01:5210,826+2
29 Aug 2026, 02:0410,824+12
27 Aug 2026, 23:1410,812+12
26 Aug 2026, 23:3610,800+8
25 Aug 2026, 21:5510,792+1
24 Aug 2026, 19:3810,791+11
23 Aug 2026, 02:0410,780+26
21 Aug 2026, 17:0810,754-3
20 Aug 2026, 18:3810,757first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 7 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 10,986 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,590
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held33 (7 July 202631 August 2026)
Views total7,925
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 20:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC795 viewsread 1 September 2026

[أهل الجنة] هم الذين اتَّصفوا بهذه الصفاتِ الأربع: إحداها: أن يكون أوَّابًا؛ أي: رَجَّاعًا إلى الله؛ من معصيتِهِ إلى طاعتِهِ، ومن الغفلةِ عنه إلى ذِكْرِهِ. الثانية: أن يكون حفيظًا لِمَا ائتَمَنَهُ الله عليه وافتَرَضَهُ. الثالثةُ: الإقرار بوجودِهِ وربوبيتِهِ وقدرتهِ وعلمِهِ واطلاعِهِ على تفاصيلِ أحوالِ العبدِ، ويَتضمَّنُ الإقرار بكتبِهِ ورسلِهِ وأمرِهِ ونهيِهِ، ويَتضمَّنُ الإقرار بوَعْدِهِ ووَعيدِهِ ولِقائِهِ. الر

29 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC≈1,210 viewsread 1 September 2026

[ الاختصام في القرآن ] ‏« وقد أخْبَرَ سبحانَه عن اختصام الكُفَّار والشياطين بين يديه في سورتي الصافات والأعراف، وأخبرَ عن اختصام الناس بين يديهِ سبحانَه في سورة الزمر، وأخبَر عن اختصام أهلِ النارِ فيها في سورة الشعراءِ وسورةِ ص » • ابن القيم | الفوائد صـ (١٦)

28 Aug 2026, 14:10 UTC≈1,560 viewsread 1 September 2026

جاءتْ براهينُ المعادِ في القرآن مَبْنِيَّةً على ثلاثةِ أصول: أحدُها: تقريرُ كمال علم الربِّ سبحانَه. والثاني: تقريرُ كمال قدرتِهِ. والثالثُ: كمالُ حكمتِهِ. • ابن القيم | الفوائد صـ (٨)

26 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈2,060 viewsread 1 September 2026

شُبَه المُنكِرين للمعاد تعودُ إلى ثلاثةِ أنواع: أحدها: اختلاطُ أجزائِهِم بأجزاءِ الأرض على وجهٍ لا يتميَّزُ ولا يحصُلُ معه تميُّزُ شخصٍ عن شخصٍ! الثاني: أن القدرة لا تتعلَّقُ بذلك! الثالث: أن ذلك أمرٌ لا فائدةَ فيه! وإنما الحكمةُ اقتضَتْ دوامَ هذا النوع الإنسانيِّ شيئًا بعد شيءٍ هكذا أبدًا؛ كلما مات جِيلٌ؛ خَلَفَهُ جِيلٌ آخرُ؛ فأمَّا أن يُمِيتَ النوعَ الإنسانيَّ كلَّه ثم يُحْيِيَهُ بعد ذَلك؛ فلا حكَمةَ في ذلك! •

25 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈2,300 viewsread 1 September 2026

[ من أغراض سورة ق ] ‏« وقد جمعتْ هذه السورةُ من أصول الإيمان ما يكفي ويشْفي ويُغْني عن كلام أهل الكلام ومعقولِ أهل المعقول؛ فإنَّها تضمَّنَتْ تقريرَ المبدأ والمعاد والتوحيد والنبوةِ والإيمان بالملائكة، وانقسام الناس إلى هالكٍ شقيٍّ وفائزٍ سعيدٍ، وأوصاف هؤلاء وهؤلاء، وتضمَّنتْ إثبات صفات الكمال لله وتنزيهه عما يُضَادُّ كماله من النقائص والعيوب، وذكر فيها القيامتينِ الصُّغرى والكبرى، والعالمَين: الأكبرَ -وهو عالمُ الآ

23 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈2,660 viewsread 1 September 2026

فعينُ اليقين نوعان: ‏« نوعٌ في الدُّنيا، ونوعٌ في الآخرة. فالحاصلُ في الدُّنيا نسبتُه إلى القلب كنسبةِ الشاهد إلى العين. وما أخبرتْ به الرسلُ من الغيب يُعايَنُ في الآخرة بالأبصار وفي الدنيا بالبصائر؛ فهو عينُ يقينٍ في المرتبتين » • ابن القيم | الفوائد صـ (٥)

21 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC≈3,070 viewsread 1 September 2026

[ شروط الانتفاع بالقرآن ] ‏« إذا حصل المؤثِّرُ وهو القرآنُ، والمحلُّ القابلُ وهو القلبُ الحيُّ، ووُجِد الشرطُ وهو الإصغاءُ، وانتفى المانعُ وهو اشتغالُ القلبِ وذهولُه عن معنى الخطاب وانصرافُه عنه إلى شيءٍ آخر؛ حَصَل الأثرُ وهو الانتفاعُ والتذكُّرُ » • ابن القيم | الفوائد صـ (٤)

20 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈3,320 viewsread 1 September 2026

‏« إذا أردت الانتفاع بالقرآن فاجمعْ قلبك عند تلاوته وسماعه، وألْقِ سمعَك، واحضُرْ حُضورَ من يخاطبه به من تكلم به سبحانه منه إليه؛ فإنه خطابٌ منه لك على لسان رسوله ﷺ » • ابن القيم | الفوائد صـ (٣)

18 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈3,740 viewsread 1 September 2026

[ ختام الكتاب، دعاء وابتهال ] ‏« نسأل الله العظيم ربَّ العرش العظيم أن يجعلنا ممن آثر حبه على هواه، وابتغى بذلك قربه ورضاه » • ابن القيم | الداء والدواء صـ (٥٧٣)

17 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC≈4,110 viewsread 1 September 2026

العشاق ثلاثة أقسام: ١) منهم من يعشق الجمال المطلق. ٢) ومنهم من يعشق الجمال المقيد، سواء طمع بوصاله أو لم يطمع. ٣) ومنهم من لا يعشق إلا من يطمع في الوصول إليه. - فعاشق الجمال المطلق قلبه يهيم في كل واد، وله في كل صورة جميلة مراد. - وعاشق الجمال المقيد أثبتُ على معشوقه، وأدوَمُ محبةً له. - وعاشق الجمال الذي يطمع في وصاله أعقَلُ العشاق وأعرَفهم، وحبه أقوى لأن الطمع يُمِدّه ويُقوّيه. • ابن القيم | الداء والدواء صـ

15 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈3,860 viewsread 1 September 2026

‏« قال بعض السلف: إذا سقط العبد من عين الله ابتلاه بمحبة المردان » • ابن القيم | الداء والدواء صـ (٥٦٥)

14 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC≈4,280 viewsread 1 September 2026

‏« فإذا رأيت الرجل: ذوقَه وجدَه وطربَه ونشوتَه في سماع الأبيات دون سماع الآيات، وفي سماع الألحان دون سماع القرآن فهذا من أقوى الأدلة على فراغ قلبه من محبة الله وكلامه، وتعلقه بمحبة سماع الشيطان؛ والمغرور يعتقد أنه على شيء! » • ابن القيم | الداء والدواء صـ (٥٥١)

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @iilllii7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

من أقوال أبن تيمية وأبن القيم
@thamar4 · 57,902
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
أناشيد أفراح _دف فقط
@a3rasa3ras · 27,143
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“فوائد ابن القيم” (@iilllii7), 10,986 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iilllii7.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.