[أهل الجنة] هم الذين اتَّصفوا بهذه الصفاتِ الأربع: إحداها: أن يكون أوَّابًا؛ أي: رَجَّاعًا إلى الله؛ من معصيتِهِ إلى طاعتِهِ، ومن الغفلةِ عنه إلى ذِكْرِهِ. الثانية: أن يكون حفيظًا لِمَا ائتَمَنَهُ الله عليه وافتَرَضَهُ. الثالثةُ: الإقرار بوجودِهِ وربوبيتِهِ وقدرتهِ وعلمِهِ واطلاعِهِ على تفاصيلِ أحوالِ العبدِ، ويَتضمَّنُ الإقرار بكتبِهِ ورسلِهِ وأمرِهِ ونهيِهِ، ويَتضمَّنُ الإقرار بوَعْدِهِ ووَعيدِهِ ولِقائِهِ. الر…

Channel
فوائد ابن القيم
@iilllii7
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,986subscribers
+362 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001994182365 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iilllii7 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iilllii7 |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 10,986 | +26 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 10,960 | +15 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 10,945 | +16 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 10,929 | +27 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 10,902 | +17 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 10,885 | +9 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 00:16 | 10,876 | +11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:02 | 10,865 | +7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:04 | 10,858 | +15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:47 | 10,843 | +8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 10,835 | +9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 10,826 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 10,824 | +12 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 10,812 | +12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 10,800 | +8 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 10,792 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 10,791 | +11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 10,780 | +26 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 10,754 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 10,757 | first reading |
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 14.4%
- avg views ÷ 10,986 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,590
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (7 July 2026 – 31 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,925 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 20:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
[ الاختصام في القرآن ] « وقد أخْبَرَ سبحانَه عن اختصام الكُفَّار والشياطين بين يديه في سورتي الصافات والأعراف، وأخبرَ عن اختصام الناس بين يديهِ سبحانَه في سورة الزمر، وأخبَر عن اختصام أهلِ النارِ فيها في سورة الشعراءِ وسورةِ ص » • ابن القيم | الفوائد صـ (١٦)
جاءتْ براهينُ المعادِ في القرآن مَبْنِيَّةً على ثلاثةِ أصول: أحدُها: تقريرُ كمال علم الربِّ سبحانَه. والثاني: تقريرُ كمال قدرتِهِ. والثالثُ: كمالُ حكمتِهِ. • ابن القيم | الفوائد صـ (٨)
شُبَه المُنكِرين للمعاد تعودُ إلى ثلاثةِ أنواع: أحدها: اختلاطُ أجزائِهِم بأجزاءِ الأرض على وجهٍ لا يتميَّزُ ولا يحصُلُ معه تميُّزُ شخصٍ عن شخصٍ! الثاني: أن القدرة لا تتعلَّقُ بذلك! الثالث: أن ذلك أمرٌ لا فائدةَ فيه! وإنما الحكمةُ اقتضَتْ دوامَ هذا النوع الإنسانيِّ شيئًا بعد شيءٍ هكذا أبدًا؛ كلما مات جِيلٌ؛ خَلَفَهُ جِيلٌ آخرُ؛ فأمَّا أن يُمِيتَ النوعَ الإنسانيَّ كلَّه ثم يُحْيِيَهُ بعد ذَلك؛ فلا حكَمةَ في ذلك! • …
[ من أغراض سورة ق ] « وقد جمعتْ هذه السورةُ من أصول الإيمان ما يكفي ويشْفي ويُغْني عن كلام أهل الكلام ومعقولِ أهل المعقول؛ فإنَّها تضمَّنَتْ تقريرَ المبدأ والمعاد والتوحيد والنبوةِ والإيمان بالملائكة، وانقسام الناس إلى هالكٍ شقيٍّ وفائزٍ سعيدٍ، وأوصاف هؤلاء وهؤلاء، وتضمَّنتْ إثبات صفات الكمال لله وتنزيهه عما يُضَادُّ كماله من النقائص والعيوب، وذكر فيها القيامتينِ الصُّغرى والكبرى، والعالمَين: الأكبرَ -وهو عالمُ الآ…
فعينُ اليقين نوعان: « نوعٌ في الدُّنيا، ونوعٌ في الآخرة. فالحاصلُ في الدُّنيا نسبتُه إلى القلب كنسبةِ الشاهد إلى العين. وما أخبرتْ به الرسلُ من الغيب يُعايَنُ في الآخرة بالأبصار وفي الدنيا بالبصائر؛ فهو عينُ يقينٍ في المرتبتين » • ابن القيم | الفوائد صـ (٥)
[ شروط الانتفاع بالقرآن ] « إذا حصل المؤثِّرُ وهو القرآنُ، والمحلُّ القابلُ وهو القلبُ الحيُّ، ووُجِد الشرطُ وهو الإصغاءُ، وانتفى المانعُ وهو اشتغالُ القلبِ وذهولُه عن معنى الخطاب وانصرافُه عنه إلى شيءٍ آخر؛ حَصَل الأثرُ وهو الانتفاعُ والتذكُّرُ » • ابن القيم | الفوائد صـ (٤)
« إذا أردت الانتفاع بالقرآن فاجمعْ قلبك عند تلاوته وسماعه، وألْقِ سمعَك، واحضُرْ حُضورَ من يخاطبه به من تكلم به سبحانه منه إليه؛ فإنه خطابٌ منه لك على لسان رسوله ﷺ » • ابن القيم | الفوائد صـ (٣)
[ ختام الكتاب، دعاء وابتهال ] « نسأل الله العظيم ربَّ العرش العظيم أن يجعلنا ممن آثر حبه على هواه، وابتغى بذلك قربه ورضاه » • ابن القيم | الداء والدواء صـ (٥٧٣)
العشاق ثلاثة أقسام: ١) منهم من يعشق الجمال المطلق. ٢) ومنهم من يعشق الجمال المقيد، سواء طمع بوصاله أو لم يطمع. ٣) ومنهم من لا يعشق إلا من يطمع في الوصول إليه. - فعاشق الجمال المطلق قلبه يهيم في كل واد، وله في كل صورة جميلة مراد. - وعاشق الجمال المقيد أثبتُ على معشوقه، وأدوَمُ محبةً له. - وعاشق الجمال الذي يطمع في وصاله أعقَلُ العشاق وأعرَفهم، وحبه أقوى لأن الطمع يُمِدّه ويُقوّيه. • ابن القيم | الداء والدواء صـ…
« قال بعض السلف: إذا سقط العبد من عين الله ابتلاه بمحبة المردان » • ابن القيم | الداء والدواء صـ (٥٦٥)
« فإذا رأيت الرجل: ذوقَه وجدَه وطربَه ونشوتَه في سماع الأبيات دون سماع الآيات، وفي سماع الألحان دون سماع القرآن فهذا من أقوى الأدلة على فراغ قلبه من محبة الله وكلامه، وتعلقه بمحبة سماع الشيطان؛ والمغرور يعتقد أنه على شيء! » • ابن القيم | الداء والدواء صـ (٥٥١)
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @iilllii7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@thamar4 · 57,902
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
@a3rasa3ras · 27,143
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فوائد ابن القيم” (@iilllii7), 10,986 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iilllii7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.