Remember, don't be a sucker.
🤔48👎7👍6❤5🔥3🥰2😍2⚡1

Channel
@illsvc
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,576subscribers
-85 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001760911347 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @illsvc |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 20 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/illsvc |
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Oct 2026, 13:01 | 3,576 | -7 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:15 | 3,583 | -1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 04:10 | 3,584 | -1 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 3,585 | -5 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 15:31 | 3,590 | -6 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 08:57 | 3,596 | -2 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 3,598 | -18 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 3,616 | -7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:35 | 3,623 | -5 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 3,628 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:23 | 3,630 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 3,637 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 3,639 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 09:16 | 3,642 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:21 | 3,650 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 3,653 | -8 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:48 | 3,661 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 3,662 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 3,661 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 3,661 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,729 reactions across 19 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 773 | 28.3% | |
| 🔥 | 525 | 19.2% | |
| 👎 | 397 | 14.5% | |
| 👍 | 276 | 10.1% | |
| 🫡 | 243 | 8.90% | |
| 💔 | 188 | 6.89% | |
| 🤔 | 48 | 1.76% | |
| 🥰 | 40 | 1.47% | |
| 🗿 | 34 | 1.25% | |
| 😘 | 27 | 0.989% | |
| 👏 | 22 | 0.806% | |
| ❤🔥 | 15 | 0.55% | |
| 😍 | 14 | 0.513% | |
| 🙈 | 13 | 0.476% | |
| 🕊 | 12 | 0.44% | |
| 🤣 | 11 | 0.403% | |
| 🍌 | 9 | 0.33% | |
| 🎉 | 9 | 0.33% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 0.293% | |
| 🤝 | 8 | 0.293% | |
| 14 further kinds | 57 | 2.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,729 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2023 to 14 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Remember, don't be a sucker.
🤔48👎7👍6❤5🔥3🥰2😍2⚡1
Huge shoutout to Snow Proxies for taking us up on the sponsorship spot. Very professional and HQ. Expect a lot more data on the site in coming weeks and months. Check them out at https://snowproxies.digital/ 🤩
🔥71❤20🕊12👍11👎8💔5🎉3👏2
Howdy, quick cyberbegging announcement. You may have noticed that search.0t.rocks' record count hasn't increased recently. Partially because of my laziness in not converting data but primarily due to maxing out of the hardware I have available to me. Right now we're rocking 4x DL380P G8s with a total of 2.2TB of RAM, but the database has managed to eat up all the memory and no matter how many optimizations I do it …
👍96❤52👎8🥰6🙉6🤝4👌3🔥3
it’s back up, let’s see how long this lasts 🤬 https://search.0t.rocks
🔥355❤127👍29👎14🥰11💔10🤣9👀7
I’m shutting down the website. It’s been becoming more and more clear to me that the website is being used as a port of illegitimate business and crime rather than an effective Open-Source Intelligence tool. I have heard many amazing stories while running the search site. My favorite comes from a user who got their non-paying roommate evicted by exposing their fake name (signed on a lease) and fraudulent internship…
👎360🫡243💔171❤79👍33🗿16🍌7💅6
We’re open-sourcing our search app! 💿 Many people have asked if they can host their own version of the https://search.0t.rocks. Reasons typically include hiding essential elements of information in an investigation and importing of their own datasets. 🖥 This repository contains an example Docker setup to host both the database and search app. However, if you wish to index billions of records, the recommended config…
❤81👍5🔥4🤝4🌭2🍌2🍾2🤩2
Channel name was changed to «Zero Trust LTD»
We’ve got our domain back! Yay! Never making that mistake again. 👤 Everything will now be moving to https://0t.rocks, this was already planned to get away from the shady naming of “Illicit Services” (this site started as a joke, could you believe that?). For most people that means you’ll want to visit https://search.0t.rocks from now on. For those that had export credits, you can restore your credits by: - Visiti…
❤63👍11🎉4🔥2😘2😁1😍1
Good morning. The site will face extended downtime due to registrar issues. Essentially: Njalla shit the bed. I recently switched to them after receiving multiple frivolous DMCA takedowns, now about a week after transferring the site to them Njalla updated the nameservers to their own and their front end is so broken I can’t change them back. In the meantime, a mirror of the site is available here: https://search.0…
❤56👍21🥰3🍓2🔥2😘1
Site's back up. Reason for downtime: Server updates overloaded the 15GB LTE connection uplink which connects the backend to the outside world. Additionally, when the reverse SSH tunnel that connects the internal reverse proxy to the internet reverse proxy reconnected, it kept interactively prompting for a password. Yes. We actually run everything over SSH-over-LTE. Lessons have been learned. Thanks for your patienc…
❤64👍8🥰2😘2🔥1
Pool's open! 🤩 We've got some questions about how the map feature works. For those in the US, it can be a rather powerful tool when you need to find information about people living in a certain area. We've just re-written the map tool to work with CesiumJS, so it's easier to use, and 3D :) Here's a quick demo, all you need to do is click somewhere in the US. We've also added integration with various ArcGIS parcel M…
❤30👍23🔥9🥰2😘2😍1
we back 🙂
❤44🥰7🙏7🎉2👍1💅1😘1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @illsvc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@illsvc named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zero Trust LTD” (@illsvc), 3,576 subscribers as measured 28 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/illsvc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.