Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for illuminatigem channel

Channel

illuminatigem channel

@illuminatigem

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,028subscribers

-100 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001453330098
TypeChannel
Username@illuminatigem
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/illuminatigem

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,0283,1283,0786 August 2026 — 3,128 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,127 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,120 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,113 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,105 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,101 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,096 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,089 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,080 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,070 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,064 subscribers9 September 2026 — 3,053 subscribers13 September 2026 — 3,036 subscribers16 September 2026 — 3,028 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net -100. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,013–3,143 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 23:163,028-8
13 Sept 2026, 02:413,036-17
9 Sept 2026, 05:593,053-11
3 Sept 2026, 19:183,064-6
31 Aug 2026, 13:573,070-10
28 Aug 2026, 22:473,080-9
25 Aug 2026, 21:283,089-7
23 Aug 2026, 03:183,096-5
19 Aug 2026, 13:083,101-4
16 Aug 2026, 18:163,105-8
13 Aug 2026, 05:273,113-7
10 Aug 2026, 05:253,120-7
7 Aug 2026, 14:263,127-1
6 Aug 2026, 20:463,128first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 1 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 16 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jun 2026, 16:23 UTC668 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

JUST IN: Elon Musk is now worth more than Bitcoin's entire market cap. Elon Musk: $1.4 trillion Bitcoin: $1.3 trillion Unbelievable 👀😂😂

👍6

15 Jun 2026, 17:32 UTC876 viewsread 7 August 2026

Well .. tomorrow Japan .. but.. will be enough to ruin the temporary run? I mean.. as I told u I'm expecting a little run for july.. will see 👀

11 Jun 2026, 09:18 UTC751 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/i/status/2064989937871868386 Mmm.. this will be interesting too.. spacex ipo success.. btc will be infected by this? 🤔

9 Jun 2026, 08:17 UTC775 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

In a week.. Japan will rise the rates ( poly market giving 96% for 0.25%).. so.. a new low can be charged.. depends on how dip.. even if I guess it's mostly already priced.. then .. I can expect a little run on July/aug.. forming a new higher low.. lets follow 👍

👍3

9 Jun 2026, 08:09 UTC710 viewsread 7 August 2026

Ok.. the bearmarket Is still in.. starting the 3rd phase.. formed the June lower low after the Feb one.. what expecting now..

5 Jun 2026, 16:37 UTC663 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/i/status/2050287706001850683 Look at the tweet

5 Jun 2026, 16:36 UTC730 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

BREAKING: Bitcoin crashes under $60,000 Okok we were right 👍

4 Jun 2026, 19:07 UTC672 viewsread 7 August 2026

JUST IN: Over 50% of all Bitcoin $BTC in circulation is now held at an unrealized loss. Well this is not bad 😎😎 We have holders 😁

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @illuminatigem. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

The illuminati show
@theilluminatishow · 23,741
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 17 September 2026
Topresale 💎
@topresale · 85,951
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Next 100X GEMS
@NEXT100XGEMS · 42,953
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“illuminatigem channel” (@illuminatigem), 3,028 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/illuminatigem.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.