Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IlmFeed

Channel

IlmFeed

@ilmfeed

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,643subscribers

-132 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001004449039
TypeChannel
Username@ilmfeed
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ilmfeed

Growth

11,64311,77511,7096 August 2026 — 11,775 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,774 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,769 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,765 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,758 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,753 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,749 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,745 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,739 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,731 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,723 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,717 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,714 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,707 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,696 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,691 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,688 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,682 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,680 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,676 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,672 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,662 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,651 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,643 subscribers6 August 20261 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 26 days, net -132. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,623–11,795 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 19:0811,643-8
31 Aug 2026, 18:2711,651-11
30 Aug 2026, 15:0311,662-10
29 Aug 2026, 12:5611,672-4
28 Aug 2026, 12:2711,676-4
27 Aug 2026, 13:1311,680-2
26 Aug 2026, 10:2811,682-6
25 Aug 2026, 08:4511,688-3
24 Aug 2026, 06:4311,691-5
22 Aug 2026, 11:2711,696-11
21 Aug 2026, 00:4711,707-7
20 Aug 2026, 02:3211,714-3
18 Aug 2026, 00:3511,717-6
16 Aug 2026, 22:1311,723-8
15 Aug 2026, 16:2611,731-8
14 Aug 2026, 07:3411,739-6
13 Aug 2026, 02:4611,745-4
12 Aug 2026, 03:2411,749-4
11 Aug 2026, 06:4811,753-5
10 Aug 2026, 03:3111,758first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.5%
avg views ÷ 11,643 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,330
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held27 (22 July 202631 August 2026)
Views total18,685
Reactions total498
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 17:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 41s
Average length
1m 13s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

893 reactions across 26 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
62870.3%
😢758.40%
👍738.17%
🔥576.38%
🎉131.46%
👏111.23%
😍91.01%
🤔91.01%
👎60.672%
🥰60.672%
💯30.336%
🤣20.224%
🤨10.112%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 893 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 27 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ilmfeed. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC585 views24 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Imams from across the UK came together for a charity football match at the Mile End Stadium. The Minaret Cup, organised by East London Mosque, brought Imams together to raise vital funds for our brothers and sisters in Palestine and Sudan. Ilmfeed’s very own Ustadh Shabbir and Ustadh Tufayl helped take their team to victory! 🏆

11👍11👏2

27 Aug 2026, 23:13 UTC≈1,050 views56 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Ratko Mladić, the general known as the “Butcher of Bosnia”, has died while serving a life sentence for genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes. He was convicted of genocide for his role in the Srebrenica massacre, where more than 8,000 Muslim men and boys were murdered in July 1995 . The massacre remains the worst mass killing in Europe since the Second World War. He will now face true justice in the cou

🔥41🎉13👍2

26 Aug 2026, 12:44 UTC≈1,150 views59 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

In 2023, Jaouen Hadjam was benched by the Nantes manager after choosing to observe his Ramadan fast on matchdays. A few months later, he was sold to Swiss football club Young Boys. Three years later, the Algerian international has signed for Brighton and is set to play in the Premier League. This is a significant career upgrade from the French and Swiss leagues. And the twist? Nantes have since been relegated to L

56👍3

21 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC≈1,350 views13 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

The KEY to All of Life's Goodness 🔑 Here's the link to the full podcast: youtu.be/WSC3EpTDC48

🔥76

20 Aug 2026, 12:47 UTC≈1,410 views17 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

The BIGGEST Lesson My Parents Taught Me Here's the link to the podcast: https://youtu.be/WSC3EpTDC48

17

19 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC≈1,340 views29 reactions1 Starread 1 September 2026
Photo

The Prophet ﷺ gave serious warnings about debt. He ﷺ said: “The martyr is forgiven for every sin except debt.” (Sahih Muslim) Even someone who gives their life in the path of Allah is not automatically freed from the rights they owe to others. That’s how seriously Islam treats debt. If you owe someone money, make paying it back a priority. The Prophet ﷺ said: “Delayed payment by a rich person is an act of injust

26💯3

19 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC≈1,050 views75 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Maitham Ali was upstairs at his family’s home in West London when he heard a commotion downstairs. He rushed down to find his mum and grandmother panicking. His two-day-old brother, Mohammad-Jawad, had vomited and was choking. He was turning blue and struggling to breathe. But Maitham stayed calm. He had received first aid training as a St John Ambulance Cadet and immediately told his mum what to do. He instruct

75

17 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC≈1,150 views19 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Video

The Power of Salah! Watch our latest ilmfeed podcast episode with Dr Daanish at: youtu.be/WSC3EpTDC48

19

14 Aug 2026, 23:53 UTC≈1,580 views38 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Mosques across the UK are set to hold special Prayers for Rain (Salat al-Istisqa) on Sunday, as much of the country experiences severe drought. The prolonged dry conditions are having a significant impact on farmers, wildlife and the environment, while placing increasing pressure on water supplies. Salat al-Istisqa is a prayer established in the tradition of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), performed by Mu

33😢5

14 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC≈1,480 views75 reactionsread 1 September 2026
Photo

An 18-year-old hero has died after saving six people from drowning. Ziad Mohamed Ahmed Mahmoud rushed into the sea after strong currents swept swimmers into the water off the coast of Alexandria, Egypt. Without hesitation, he battled the powerful waves and brought six people safely back to shore. But after his final rescue, exhaustion from fighting the powerful waves became too much, and Ziad was unable to make it

69👏6

13 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC≈1,390 views35 reactionsread 1 September 2026

During the lifetime of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, the sun was eclipsed. And it happened on the very day his young son Ibrahim passed away. What happened next is remarkable. The people began saying that the eclipse had occurred because Ibrahim had died. A rare celestial event had happened on the very day the Prophet ﷺ lost his son. It would have been easy to allow people to believe it. But he didn't. The Prophet ﷺ said:

32🥰3

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @ilmfeed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 162,820 of 1,629,403 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Dr. Ahmad Sanusi Azmi
@drahmadsanusiazmi · 44,301
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IlmFeed” (@ilmfeed), 11,643 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilmfeed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.