Aped this viral podcast cat $Podcat https://gmgn.ai/sol/token/XODBMDi3_2fnGKgfwYjqv99ppnKCq5nCLLhRSJAPAhSMVkqjipump

Channel
I LOVE TRENCHES 🪖
@ilovetrenches
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,586subscribers
-1,218 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002866487387 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ilovetrenches |
| Description | personal diary nothing posted here is financial advice |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ilovetrenches |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:19 | 8,586 | -138 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:58 | 8,724 | -70 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 10:40 | 8,794 | -46 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 16:56 | 8,840 | -52 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:28 | 8,892 | -30 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:45 | 8,922 | -18 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 14:55 | 8,940 | -30 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 09:00 | 8,970 | -71 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 13:41 | 9,041 | -80 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 9,121 | -112 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 03:41 | 9,233 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:41 | 9,238 | -36 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 9,274 | -26 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 9,300 | -47 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 9,347 | -27 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 9,374 | -17 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 9,391 | -39 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 9,430 | -71 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 9,501 | -53 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:36 | 9,554 | first reading |
Engagement
78 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 13.3%
- avg views ÷ 8,586 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,150
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 21
- of 78 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 78 (1 August 2026 – 4 November 2026) |
| Views total | 22,901 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 22:09 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 208
- Videos
- 215
- Links
- 724
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 12s
- Average length
- 4s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
https://x.com/superdegen/status/2116111049409655157
$TART I think it’s a good point to start accumulating more https://gmgn.ai/bsc/token/SuperD_0x7ab8d02cbb51ff7223fde700eaaa2a91bf750314
$NUG on pons WLD liberty finance still holding on his fomo wallet 0x8eD8Ab093d29e9ccBc26BB38Df09910Ae1d69125 https://x.com/cryptogle/status/2078393366602285306
Pangea at 12m Launched on 5 chains CZ tweeted about it https://gmgn.ai/bsc/token/XODBMDi3_0x6b6b3e166ec666ea16525265c533360b769e56ea https://x.com/cz_binance/status/2114442971768647881?s=46
0x6Be8f023B73447dd341D9910C3C4661B59927777
Cedric’s forced smile went from a meme to the most shared emoji by all flap affiliated accounts on X. He changed his PFP to the forced smile emoji 😬 Gambled some here $😬 0x6Be8f023B73447dd341D9910C3C4661B59927777 https://x.com/eth_cedric/status/2114778744535830785 https://x.com/eth_cedric/status/2114773652071694819
Aped this funny meta going on sol TSLA https://gmgn.ai/sol/token/XODBMDi3_2yX5g68uATu9x33y7MbdCDJV7M1zxpv6ikCXqYHfpump
This is literally the Japanese Dog version of swordcat going giga viral with 12M+ views! This dog is named Monaka and everyone is memeing him for holding the sword Monaka 剣を持った犬 8Vb5f7enGjp2uHuRqh1F5AVoXoXrYVZHwuw2orjepump https://x.com/narumitimatuda/status/2111841071009554916?s=46
Aped moon or dust bag on Bnb too 0x89eb75c876c36b59c0fb7e23a4ce4f66c75e7777 https://x.com/rapidresponse47/status/2113692273846206507
0x1a85a2ba35a51a6e1d8493ced21929c44f4e7777
Gambled here Paired with PEPE https://gmgn.ai/bsc/token/XODBMDi3_0x1a85a2ba35a51a6e1d8493ced21929c44f4e7777 https://x.com/flapdotsh/status/2007114297093369925
Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @ilovetrenches. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“I LOVE TRENCHES 🪖” (@ilovetrenches), 8,586 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilovetrenches.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.