Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ilya_Ivaninskiy

Channel

Ilya_Ivaninskiy

@ilya_ivaninskiy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,926subscribers

+136 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002040962466
TypeChannel
Username@ilya_ivaninskiy
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ilya_ivaninskiy

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,7901,9261,8587 August 2026 — 1,790 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,792 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,793 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,814 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,817 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,825 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,819 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,818 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,815 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,912 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,924 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,926 subscribers7 August 202613 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 37 days, net +136. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,770–1,946 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 00:361,926+2
9 Sept 2026, 09:211,924+12
3 Sept 2026, 20:211,912+97
31 Aug 2026, 07:261,815-3
27 Aug 2026, 20:381,818-1
24 Aug 2026, 21:281,819-6
21 Aug 2026, 00:321,825+8
17 Aug 2026, 18:151,817+3
14 Aug 2026, 21:371,814+21
11 Aug 2026, 06:251,793+1
8 Aug 2026, 01:381,792+2
7 Aug 2026, 09:171,790first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 12s
Average length
1m 12s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

899 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
48253.6%
❤‍🔥15216.9%
🔥12113.5%
👍697.68%
👾222.45%
😁171.89%
💯101.11%
👏80.89%
🤔50.556%
🐳40.445%
🙏40.445%
🦄30.334%
💘20.222%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 899 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ilya_ivaninskiy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 May 2026 to 19 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 14:36 UTC≈1,020 views73 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Какой лучший способ провести половину воскресенья? Правильно — до посинения бегать кругами вокруг дачи несмотря на 30 градусов на улице :) Так я сбегал первый в этом году марафон. Что я хочу вам сказать, дорогие читатели — любое дело требует регулярной практики, в том числе и бегать марафоны. Только так вы можете быть уверены, что вы всё ещё марафонец. И если год марафон не бегать, а потом вдруг побежать, болеть всё

47🔥15😁6💯4👾1

16 Jul 2026, 12:38 UTC≈1,280 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На днях виртуально посетил прямой эфир РБК, передача День Главное. Размышляли про влияние ИИ на личные инвестиции. Если вы надеетесь, что кто-то (или, в контексте этого разговора, ИИ помощник) за вас поуправляет вашими деньгами так чтобы вам не нужно было ничено делать и при этом вы стали страшно богаты, оставьте эти детские фантазии:) Работа на фондовом рынке — это настоящая работа, если вы хотите делать это актив

15👍1👾1

13 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC≈1,370 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вот так открываешь утром Ведомости, а там про твоё исследование пишут — приятно :) Тема цифрового рубля — одна из самых “заряженных” в текущем финансовом дискурсе. Степень заряженности ощутил по количеству разнонаправленных комментариев в целой куче ТГ каналов, цитаты из которых мне переслали друзья:) Хорошо, что я ТГ каналы не читаю, а только в них пишу:))) Есть много тех, кто не верит в перспективы. Я, как понятн

28🔥6👍3❤‍🔥2👾1

3 Jul 2026, 09:03 UTC≈1,740 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @procfaproVideo

👛Цифровой рубль поможет сэкономить свыше 400 млрд рублей в год Директор Центра бизнес-образования и аналитики Центрального Университета Илья Иванинский рассказал об этом на профильной сессии Финконгресса Банка России 2 июля 2026 года: По нашим оценкам, от более эффективного управления ликвидностью может быть сэкономлено до 100 млрд рублей ежегодно. От упрощения операций с недвижимостью, благотворительностью и т.д.

21❤‍🔥4🙏4👍1👾1

3 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC≈1,440 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Собственно, что я делаю в Питере:)

34👾1

30 Jun 2026, 21:34 UTC≈1,570 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всем привет из Питера! Когда-то я реализую мечту и поживу тут месяц-другой. Очень уж тут мне нравится, как говорит моя старшая дочка, вайб, особенно летом:) Отдельный риспект тому, кто как-то сумел избавиться тут от электрических самокатов и курьеров на электровелосипедах на тротуарах. Они, хотя и являются отличным способом перемещения на короткие расстояния и срочного получения заказа, также являются причиной появл

26👍5👾1

25 Jun 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,750 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Давно не рассказывал о гостях у нас в ЦУ, а меж тем, гостей у меня побывало не мало:) К нам приходила в гости Екатерина Гусева — глава Департамента международных финансовых отношений Минфина. Именно с коллегами мы готовили недавний наш доклад, посвященный инвестициям в Deep tech в странах БРИКС и затем сессию на ПМЭФ, посвященную IPO в БРИКС, До этого вместе мы работали над докладом российского председательства в

❤‍🔥3012👍4👾1

12 Jun 2026, 17:11 UTC≈2,280 views83 reactions3 Starsread 7 August 2026

Всем же нравится дополнительный выходной в пятницу, не правда ли? Можно поехать на дачу пораньше, а то и вовсе съездить куда-то подальше. А если взять выходной в понедельник, так и вовсе выходит мини-отпуск. А что же мы сегодня отмечаем, дорогие друзья? Ну то есть мы конечно знаем, что это День России. 12 июня 1990 года на первом съезде народных депутатов РСФСР была принята Декларация о государственном суверенитете

46❤‍🔥14👍13🤔5😁5

8 Jun 2026, 16:13 UTC≈3,090 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как всегда с задержкой, выкладываю наш очередной выпуск нашего со Стасей подкаста “Директора и люди”. В этот раз у нас в гостях был СЕО Московской Биржи Виктор Жидков. Вообще, биржа — один из самых старых и самых технологичных в мире бизнесов. При этом я готов спорить на серьёзные деньги, что большинство из нас понятия не имеет насколько сложно выглядит современная инфраструктура финансовых рынков — сколько там всяк

👍11🔥83🐳3😁1

7 Jun 2026, 10:25 UTC≈1,800 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Естественно, как только я попал на форум, мне стало резко не до отчётов:) Общение со старыми и новыми знакомыми в формальной и менее формальной обстановке и записывание новых мыслей — занятие весьма энергозатратное, вы понимаете:) Напишу впечатления потом, а пока, ниже ссылка на сессию про финансовую грамотность в эпоху ИИ, в которой я участвовал вчера. Как всегда повторять мысли не буду, но позволю себе привести ци

28❤‍🔥9🔥6👍3👾1

4 Jun 2026, 08:06 UTC≈1,720 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Полная версия сессии по ссылке ниже. Огромное спасибо всем участникам и зрителям! https://forum-spb.ru/programme/business-programme/157332/?utm_referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fforum-spb.ru%2F

❤‍🔥124👍1👾1

3 Jun 2026, 17:12 UTC≈1,920 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

20🔥10😁4👾1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ilya_ivaninskiy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ilya_Ivaninskiy” (@ilya_ivaninskiy), 1,926 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ilya_ivaninskiy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.