Channel
@imJuuzouswife
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
98subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 19 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004308852992 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @imJuuzouswife |
| Description | .ᐟ ֹ ₊ 𓏵ׂׅ ⋄ ᛝ I'm Juuzou's wife 𓏴 𓏴 𝄛༝༝ лс :: @Suzuyamy |
| First recorded | 19 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/imJuuzouswife |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Oct 2026, 01:22 | 98 | no change |
| 19 Oct 2026, 00:47 | 98 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (1 October 2026 – 18 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,335 |
| Reactions total | 436 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Oct 2026, 01:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
436 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💘 | 143 | 32.8% | |
| custom 5303143532238772425 | 122 | 28.0% | |
| custom 5366260224137129473 | 104 | 23.9% | |
| ❤ | 47 | 10.8% | |
| custom 5416061276172331559 | 9 | 2.06% | |
| custom 5362094376442966275 | 5 | 1.15% | |
| custom 5271694347178373633 | 2 | 0.459% | |
| custom 5206457839811337375 | 1 | 0.229% | |
| custom 5325631843561671357 | 1 | 0.229% | |
| custom 5352621349330232638 | 1 | 0.229% | |
| custom 5362033151684163277 | 1 | 0.229% |
Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 436 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 October 2026 to 18 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @imJuuzouswife. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 October 2026 to 18 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
кстати реакций стало больше ! я тока щас увидела что кто та за буст проголосовал , спасибо
custom 53620943764429662755custom 53031435322387724254custom 54160612761723315594custom 52064578398113373751custom 53256318435616713571custom 53526213493302326381
Photo, posted without a caption
💘6custom 53662602241371294735custom 54160612761723315594custom 52716943471783736331
с кем можно вп? рт пост https://t.me/imJuuzouswife/7 жду ссылку на ваш!
❤6custom 53662602241371294733custom 53031435322387724251
Sticker, posted without a caption
Posted without readable text
💘26custom 536626022413712947315custom 530314353223877242513❤2custom 52716943471783736331custom 53620331516841632771custom 54160612761723315591
Джузо было лень рисават
💘12custom 53031435322387724258custom 53662602241371294737❤1
дорогие мьюшки(ноншейр ), интересно , а как вы справляетесь с ревностью к своему ф/о ? интересно , может у каждого по разному
💘16custom 53031435322387724258❤6
Posted without readable text
custom 530314353223877242524💘20custom 536626022413712947316❤11
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 53662602241371294733
Posted without readable text
custom 536626022413712947315custom 53031435322387724258💘5❤1
ㅤֺ ⠀𝃛𝃛 я люблю .. 𐦯ֵ۫ ִ ׁ ⠀ ׅ ⠀ ㅤے ㅤ᪻ׄㅤ Джузо и Нагису !! Лучшая парочка ㅤׅ ㅤ♡࡙ ㅤִ ᪽ #lovetake | @ilikeitcf_bot
💘11❤6custom 53031435322387724254custom 53662602241371294731
ㅤㅤ ⸝⸝ ☇ 🎁 @mybfgf.t.me ᛝ ꒱ ꒱ ⋮ ۶ ТРУШНАЯ ПАРА 一 НАГИСА КИРИЯМА & ДЖУЗО СУЗУЯ ֶָ֢. ㅤㅤㅤ﹝𑣲 #tokyoghoul ୧
custom 536626022413712947310custom 53031435322387724258💘6
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @imJuuzouswife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@imJuuzouswife named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“︴˵Ṥᥙ𝒵ᥙγ𝒜's ℋe𝒜ℛt ♡゙” (@imJuuzouswife), 98 subscribers as measured 19 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imJuuzouswife.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.