Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𓏺𝖭𝗂𝖦𝗁𝖳 𝖢𝗅𝗎𝖻 ꨄ︎

Channel

𓏺𝖭𝗂𝖦𝗁𝖳 𝖢𝗅𝗎𝖻 ꨄ︎

@im_sal_ah

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,375subscribers

-3,046 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002027931364
TypeChannel
Username@im_sal_ah
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/im_sal_ah

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,37513,07510,7257 August 2026 — 11,421 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,385 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,368 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,350 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,308 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,276 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,259 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,247 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,197 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,177 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,138 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,133 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,115 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,084 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,853 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,075 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,038 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,727 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,985 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,828 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,708 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,517 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,370 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,231 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,003 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,717 subscribers8 September 2026 — 10,176 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,643 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,059 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,375 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 42 days, net -3,046. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,670–13,780 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:558,375-684
14 Sept 2026, 18:589,059-584
11 Sept 2026, 03:419,643-533
8 Sept 2026, 05:0110,176-541
4 Sept 2026, 23:1710,717-286
3 Sept 2026, 09:5411,003-228
2 Sept 2026, 04:2411,231-139
1 Sept 2026, 05:5611,370-147
31 Aug 2026, 04:3411,517-191
30 Aug 2026, 06:3811,708-120
29 Aug 2026, 06:5411,828-157
28 Aug 2026, 07:2511,985-742
27 Aug 2026, 07:1312,727-311
26 Aug 2026, 03:5613,038-37
25 Aug 2026, 01:5313,075+1,222
23 Aug 2026, 17:1511,853+769
22 Aug 2026, 00:0511,084-31
20 Aug 2026, 20:0311,115-18
19 Aug 2026, 16:5311,133-5
18 Aug 2026, 17:4411,138first reading

Engagement

71 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.59%
avg views ÷ 8,375 subscribers
Avg views / post
133
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 71 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held71 (2 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total2,931
Reactions total20
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
20m 37s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 45 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 22 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1623.9%
🌚1522.4%
👀68.96%
💯68.96%
🔥57.46%
❤‍🔥45.97%
🎉34.48%
👌34.48%
🥰34.48%
👏22.99%
🏆11.49%
👍11.49%
😁11.49%
🙏11.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 00:00 UTC6 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

تاني 😔 ؟

👌1👏1💯1

Signed Lนƒƒy

2 Sept 2026, 01:49 UTC≈1,040 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

نو شعور 😔

🌚1👌1🔥1

Signed Lนƒƒy

1 Sept 2026, 08:07 UTC36 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

🎉1

Signed ㅤ𝗦 𝗮 𝗞 𝗿 ☬ صــقــر 𓅓ㅤ

31 Aug 2026, 22:06 UTC64 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

@w_f_il كل سنه ونت طيبه يقلب اخوكي من جوا ❤️

❤‍🔥1🌚1🔥1

Signed Lนƒƒy

31 Aug 2026, 21:31 UTC31 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @w_f_1iPhoto

🎂 Today I completed another year of my life. O God , I entrust to You the past year of my life, so forgive me for what was in it, and bless me in the coming year. O Lord, grant me goodness, happiness, and days like my dreams, and make it a year of goodness without loss or sadness.👠❤️ 💃💃💃💃💃🌟

Signed 𝑤𝑎𝑓𝑎𝑎"🍒

30 Aug 2026, 13:20 UTC2 viewsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @l_ii_nn

مختلفه شويه عن باقي البنات ❤️ علي الاقل أنا مش بشتم ❤️. علي الاقل مخربتش بين اتنين صحاب ❤️. علي الاقل مخربتش بين اتنين مرتبطين ❤️ علي الاقل متغيرتش مع حد م غير سبب❤️ علي الاقل مبعليش صوتي علي حد ❤️. علي الاقل مبزيفش مشاعري ناحية حد❤️ علي الاقل بحب اكون علي طبيعتي ❤️. علي الاقل مبحبش الحوارات ❤️. علي الأقل لو قلتلي سر بحافظ عليه ❤️. علي الاقل أنا بخاف علي سمعتي ويعمل حساب كل حركه وكل تصرف بعمله❤️. بعمل حساب للعشره ❤️

Signed ' ˡᵉᵉᶰ 𐙚.

30 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC4 viewsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @l_ii_nn

*⤶: مفيش حاجة اسمها " الحب الأول " و الحب " التاني " الحب للإنسان الصح ، طول عمرنا بنسمع جملة " الحب الأولاني مبيتنسيش " وڪأن القلوب اتبرمجت على إنها تقف عند أول محطة ، الحب الحقيقي ملوش ترتيب، الحب هو " الأصدق " ، " الأعمق " ، و " الأبقى " .. مفيش حاجة اسمها حب أول وتاني ، الحب الصح بيجي لما ننضج ، لما نعرف نختار الشخص اللي بيشبه روحنا ، لما بتقابل الشخص المناسب ، الشخص اللي بيحتويك ، بيفهم سڪاتك قبل ڪلامك ، و بيشيل

Signed ' ˡᵉᵉᶰ 𐙚.

30 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC45 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @w_f_1i

https://twet.link/wafaa921 💎💎

Signed 𝑤𝑎𝑓𝑎𝑎"🍒

29 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC43 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @l_ii_nn

وف النهايه بيقنا مجرد أتنين أغراب بعد مكنا اقرب اتنين لبعض🦋

Signed ' ˡᵉᵉᶰ 𐙚.

29 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC51 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @jcttc

https://t.me/x_k_u/s/47

Signed ᯓ⎝𓆩𝐂𝐀𝐍𝐒𝐄𝐑💸𓆪⎠彡

Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @im_sal_ah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𓏺𝖭𝗂𝖦𝗁𝖳 𝖢𝗅𝗎𝖻 ꨄ︎” (@im_sal_ah), 8,375 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/im_sal_ah.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.