Channel
@imnanews_ir
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,359subscribers
-29 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001073113824 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @imnanews_ir |
| Created | 4 October 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/imnanews_ir |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:55 | 3,359 | +2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 3,357 | +3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 19:58 | 3,354 | -5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 3,359 | -5 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 3,364 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 3,367 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 3,371 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 3,375 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:34 | 3,376 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:14 | 3,372 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 3,380 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:51 | 3,383 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:10 | 3,387 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 3,388 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 3,388 | first reading |
49 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 49 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
19 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 10 | 52.6% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌐 مهمترین خبرهای امروز ایمنا 🔻سران عربستان، ترکیه و پاکستان توافقنامه دفاعی امضا کردند 🔻درخشش جوانان ایران در المپیاد جهانی هوش مصنوعی 🔻وزارت خارجه آمریکا از وضع تحریمهای جدید علیه ایران خبر داد 🔻یحیی سریع: مواضع نظامیان سعودی را هدف قرار دادیم 🔻 پزشکیان: هرگز استعفا ندادهام و نخواهم داد 📱مشاهده ایمنا در فضای مجازی
🎥 پزشکیان: کسانی که بدون داده یا با اطلاعات ناقص نسخه میپیچند، جامعه را به انحراف میبرند. 🔹عدهای برای جامعهای به این پیچیدگی، درباره اقتصاد، سیاست، جامعهشناسی و کشاورزی همزمان نظر میدهند و راهحل ارائه میکنند؛ این علم را از کجا آوردهاند؟ 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
🎥 پزشکیان: با گفتوگو توانستیم جنگ لبنان را متوقف کنیم، محاصره را برداریم و برخی تحریمها را کاهش دهیم. 🔹عدهای میخواهند بجنگیم؛ همان چیزی که اسرائیل میخواهد تا ما را وادار به تسلیم کند. 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
🎥 پزشکیان: کلیات توافق نهایی شده بود و برای افزایش اعتبار آن، قرار بود امضای نهایی از سوی ترامپ انجام شود تا امکان عقبنشینی از توافق وجود نداشته باشد. 🔹اما کمتر از ۲۴ ساعت بعد، روند مذاکرات بهطور کامل تغییر کرد و توافق به سرانجام نرسید. 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
🎥 پزشکیان: از قالیباف خواهش کردیم که رئیس تیم مذاکرهکننده شود 🔹همکاری و هماهنگی میان دولت، مجلس، قوه قضائیه و نیروهای مسلح، عامل اصلی عبور از شرایط سخت بوده است. 🔹بیاحترامی و تفرقه، خواستۀ دشمن است و باید با همدلی و احترام با یکدیگر رفتار کنیم. 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
🎥 پزشکیان: هرگز استعفا ندادهام و نخواهم داد 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
🎥 پزشکیان: هیچ دولتی به اندازۀ ما در جهت سیاستهای رهبری قدم برنداشت 🔹اینکه عدهای اختلافسازی کنند و القا کنند رهبری چیزی میگویند و دولت چیز دیگری، هم در حق رهبری جفاست و هم در حق دولت. 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
🎥 پزشکیان: تفاهمنامه آتشبس با هماهنگی، تفاهم و همدلی در شورای امنیت ملی شکل گرفته است 🔹ما با نیروهای نظامی کاملاً هماهنگ هستیم و پشتیبانی از آنان را وظیفه خود میدانیم. 🔹کسانی که جانشان را کف دست گرفتهاند و از این کشور دفاع میکنند، مگر ممکن است میان ما و آنها اختلافی باشد؟ 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
🎥 پزشکیان: آمریکا از سرزمین کشورهای منطقه به ما حمله میکند و ما باید از خود دفاع کنیم 🔹مبدأ حمله به مدرسۀ میناب یکی از کشورهای مسلمان بود. 🔹دشمن از پایگاههای آمریکا در برخی کشورهای منطقه علیه ایران استفاده کرد و ایران ناچار به دفاع از خود شد. 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
👎1
🎥 پزشکیان: هیچ امتیازی در تفاهمنامه ندادیم 🔹میگویند آمریکا به تعهداتش عمل نمیکند؛ تا جایی که آنها عمل کنند، ما نیز عمل میکنیم. آنچه به دست آوردیم امتیاز بود؛ اینکه آمریکا از محاصره کنار کشید، به معنای امتیاز دادن ما نبود. 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
🎥 پزشکیان: ایران آغازگر جنگ نبود و همراهی مردم، محاسبات دشمن برای فروپاشی کشور را برهم زد. 🔹امروز ایران با قدرت و انسجام بیشتری مسیر خود را ادامه میدهد؛ دشمن روی فروپاشی کشور حساب کرده بود، اما ناکام ماند 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
👎1
🎥 زیر بار زور نمیرویم، اما بهدنبال جنگ و تجاوز هم نیستیم 🔹ایران بهدنبال جنگ یا توسعهطلبی نیست و تنها از توان دفاعی و امنیت خود حفاظت میکند؛ اگر فشار و تهدید علیه ایران متوقف شود، دلیلی برای ادامه تنش وجود نخواهد داشت. 🌐 imna.ir | @imnanews_ir
👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @imnanews_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“خبرگزاری ایمنا” (@imnanews_ir), 3,359 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imnanews_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.