Channel
@imoney_t
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
800subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002120660868 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @imoney_t |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/imoney_t |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:58 | 800 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 06:35 | 803 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 807 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:36 | 814 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 809 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 809 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
262 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 162 | 61.8% | |
| 👍 | 64 | 24.4% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 8.40% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 2.67% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 2.29% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.382% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 262 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @imoney_t. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 13 June 2026 to 30 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#WLFIUSDT analysis (8H) After a strong bullish impulse, WLFI is trading just below the trigger lines and has developed a healthy compression, indicating an accumulation phase. Following the formation of an SW Low, the price moved higher and formed a bullish iCH. From the current demand zone, WLFI is expected to advance toward the highlighted supply zone. A daily candle close below the invalidation level would inv…
❤16👍10
😤 We've reduced our activity because you're not reacting to our posts. If you want us to stay active and keep sharing analyses, make sure to leave reactions on our posts. It only takes a second to tap the reaction button, and your support really makes a difference.
❤25🔥15💯7🤯4👍2🐳1
#ARUSDT analysis (12H) AR has a bullish market structure. After forming bullish CHoCHs and bullish BOSs, it has now swept the sell side liquidity at the bottom of the chart and is expected to move toward the marked targets. You can buy at the current market price or within the marked demand zone. The targets are marked on the chart. Move your stop loss to breakeven after Target 1 is reached. A daily candle close …
❤20🔥7
▶️ #XLMUSDT analysis (2H) Update See what happened? The price eventually reached our entry zone, dropped by more than 24%, and successfully hit our third target. When this analysis was first published, many people dismissed it as worthless, criticized us, and even left the channel. But this is a reminder that the key to success in this market is patience. @iMoney_T
❤18
▶️ #JSTUSDT analysis (8H) Update Eventually, the price reached the marked zone and the main supply zone. @iMoney_T
❤9👍1
▶️ #VVVUSDT analysis (4H) Update The bearish outlook on VVV played out as expected, but the price never reached our entry zone. @iMoney_T
❤11
▶️ #ETHUSDT analysis (4H) Update Ethereum never reached the invalidation level and, as expected, dropped by more than 12%, successfully hitting the third target. @iMoney_T
👍12
▶️ #BTCUSDT analysis (2H) Update The price dropped by more than 11% from the marked zone, and all three specified targets were successfully reached. @iMoney_T
👍12
🛑 The Polkadot setup has been invalidated.
🤯2
▶️ #INJUSDT analysis (2H) Update Following the reaction from our entry zones, the price declined by over 6%, and Target 1 was successfully reached. @iMoney_T
❤13
#INJUSDT analysis (2H) The price structure has turned bearish following the sweep of the previous high and the formation of a bearish Change of Character (CHoCH). A pullback to the upside is expected from slightly lower levels before the market continues its downward move. We have identified two entry zones on the pullback. Positions should be built using a DCA (Dollar-Cost Averaging) approach. The targets are ma…
👍5❤4
#DOTUSDT analysis (4H) An important trendline has been broken with a strong bullish candle, and we also have a bullish iCH (Internal Change of Character) on the chart, which is one of the first signs of buyers stepping into the market. In addition, after forming a Swing High (SWH), Polkadot has consistently printed higher lows, further supporting the bullish structure. We expect price to pull back into the marked …
❤10
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @imoney_t. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“iMoneyTeam” (@imoney_t), 800 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imoney_t.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.