Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IMPACT

Channel

IMPACT

@impact_transport

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

529subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001395270396
TypeChannel
Username@impact_transport
Created18 August 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/impact_transport

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5285305297 August 2026 — 530 subscribers7 August 2026 — 530 subscribers29 August 2026 — 528 subscribers7 September 2026 — 530 subscribers14 September 2026 — 529 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 38 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 528–530 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 05:39529-1
7 Sept 2026, 08:37530+2
29 Aug 2026, 09:53528-2
7 Aug 2026, 11:03530no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:26530first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 05:53 UTC107 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ИМИТАЦИЯ ПРОВЕРКИ ПОСТАВЩИКОВ В ЛИЗИНГОВЫХ КОМПАНИЯХ Добрый день уважаемые коллеги и партнеры. На сайте арбитражного суда опубликовано судебное решение, связанное с применением недобросовестных налоговых практик продавцом автомобильной техники ООО «АВТОТЕХ-М1» Из решения суда: «Как следует из заявления и материалов дела, Инспекцией совместно с сотрудниками 5 отделения ОЭБиПК УВД по ЮВАО ГУ МВД России по г. М

30 Jul 2026, 08:50 UTC152 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Вопрос 6

  1. Да29%
  2. Нет43%
  3. Хочу посмотреть результаты29%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jul 2026, 08:50 UTC144 viewsread 7 August 2026

Вопрос №6 Имеются ли законные методы проверки указанных выше сведений не правоохранительными органами?

30 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTC144 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Вопрос 5

  1. Да17%
  2. Нет42%
  3. Хочу посмотреть результаты42%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTC140 viewsread 7 August 2026

Вопрос №5 Доступна ли проверка принадлежности ТС с помощью ресурсов ГИБДД с целью выяснения персональных данных собственника того или иного ТС для неограниченного круга лиц?

30 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTC139 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Вопрос №4

  1. Да13%
  2. Нет47%
  3. Хочу посмотреть результаты40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTC138 viewsread 7 August 2026

Добрый день уважаемые коллеги. Просим Вас продолжить участие в опросах. Вопрос №4: «Возможна ли проверка принадлежности ТС с помощью ресурсов ГИВДЦ (сайт https://госавтоинспекция.рф/, https:///мвд.рф/ или иные) с целью выяснения персональных данных собственника того или иного ТС? •

28 Jul 2026, 11:58 UTC516 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ИМИТАЦИЯ ОЦЕНКИ НАЛОГОВЫХ РИСКОВ В ЛИЗИНГОВЫХ КОМПАНИЯХ Добрый день уважаемые коллеги и партнеры. На сайте https://abireg.ru/newsitem/115910/ вышла интересная статья, связанная с банкротством компании «БигКар» ИНН 5405002220. Из статьи: «Арбитражный суд признал банкротом тамбовского грузоперевозчика «Бигкар» с выручкой 2,45 млрд рублей, несмотря на прибыль в 31 млн рублей по итогам 2024 года. Причина — крупные

23 Jul 2026, 10:26 UTC211 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Вопрос №3

  1. Да19%
  2. Нет50%
  3. Хочу посмотреть результаты31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Jul 2026, 10:26 UTC201 viewsread 7 August 2026

Вопрос №3 «Возможно ли с помощью информационных ресурсов: сайт Федеральной службы судебных приставов, сайт Госавтоинспекции, сайт «Репутация», а так же звонка водителю по предоставленному телефону и инструктаж водителя оказать следующие услуги: - проверка водителей транспортных средств, осуществляющих перевозку грузов между заказчиком и контрагентами Заказчика; - проверка водителей транспортных средств, осуществляющ

23 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC164 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Вопрос №2

  1. Да7%
  2. Нет50%
  3. Хочу посмотреть результаты43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Jul 2026, 10:24 UTC166 viewsread 7 August 2026

Вопрос №2 Вопрос – доверяете ли Вы заключению, в котором содержится рекомендация о возможном взаимодействии с объектами проверки по перевозке груза или об отказе взаимодействия с объектами проверки по перевозке груза с использованием сайта Федеральной службы судебных приставов, сайта Госавтоинспекции, сайта «Репутация», а так же звонку водителю по предоставленному телефону и проведенному инструктажу водителя?

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @impact_transport. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jul 2026, 08:50 UTCAnonymous Poll14 voters

Вопрос 6

  1. Да29%
  2. Нет43%
  3. Хочу посмотреть результаты29%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jul 2026, 08:49 UTCAnonymous Poll12 voters

Вопрос 5

  1. Да17%
  2. Нет42%
  3. Хочу посмотреть результаты42%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jul 2026, 08:47 UTCAnonymous Poll15 voters

Вопрос №4

  1. Да13%
  2. Нет47%
  3. Хочу посмотреть результаты40%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Jul 2026, 10:26 UTCAnonymous Poll16 voters

Вопрос №3

  1. Да19%
  2. Нет50%
  3. Хочу посмотреть результаты31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTCAnonymous Poll14 voters

Вопрос №2

  1. Да7%
  2. Нет50%
  3. Хочу посмотреть результаты43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

23 Jul 2026, 10:24 UTCAnonymous Poll19 voters

Вопрос №1

  1. Да11%
  2. Нет53%
  3. Хочу посмотреть результаты37%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IMPACT” (@impact_transport), 529 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/impact_transport.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.