Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐼𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑑𝑡

Channel

𝐼𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑑𝑡

@imperium_c_a

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

106subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001871155999
TypeChannel
Username@imperium_c_a
Description89881165196 - связь с лидером. Дебют 23.10.2022 https://www.instagram.com/imperium.cdt/profilecard/?igsh=MXBqbTVvd3I4MXVzMg==
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded4 September 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/imperium_c_a

Growth

1064 Sept 2026, 05:47 — 106 subscribers4 Sept 2026, 06:22 — 106 subscribers4 Sept 2026, 05:474 Sept 2026, 06:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 105–107 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 06:22106no change
4 Sept 2026, 05:47106first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
118.2%
avg views ÷ 106 subscribers
Avg views / post
125
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held13 (20 July 202626 August 2026)
Views total1,128
Reactions total75
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Sept 2026, 06:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
382
Videos
220
Links
174

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
27s
Average length
9s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

81 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3745.7%
custom 53957761112736079281822.2%
❤‍🔥1012.3%
custom 538647849921519700456.17%
custom 525357157805407558333.70%
🥰33.70%
💘22.47%
😁22.47%
custom 519971866246172893311.23%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC48 views14 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Video

#shorts #trends

6🥰3custom 53864784992151970043💘2

24 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC64 views5 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Forwarded from @viviniannPhoto

💎💎💎💎💎💋 #vivi

3custom 53957761112736079282

23 Aug 2026, 19:54 UTC77 views16 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

До/после.

10custom 53957761112736079283custom 53864784992151970042custom 51997186624617289331

23 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC157 views14 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

6custom 53957761112736079285custom 52535715780540755833

23 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC78 views7 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

7

21 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC211 views12 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

Ну что, дорогие друзья. Уже послезавтра состоится KFest, на котором мы принимаем участие. Скажу честно, что в этот раз все пошло вообще не так, как мы планировали, даже не 50%. Из 100% задумки, осталось 20%. Мы даже думали снимать заявку, но все же, собрав 🥚 в кулак, решили не оставлять начатое🙂. Все трудности, с которыми мы столкнулись за короткий период перед Фестом, как мне кажется, только послужили толчком к даль

❤‍🔥63custom 53957761112736079283

19 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC201 views7 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Video

❤️‍🩹

custom 539577611127360792832😁2

31 Jul 2026, 19:38 UTC154 views6 reactionsread 4 September 2026
Photo

За секунду до. И наше любимое: "танцуем от зеркала".

❤‍🔥4custom 53957761112736079282

24 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC162 viewsread 4 September 2026
Forwarded from @aghalinafPhoto

Спойлер без контекста

20 Jul 2026, 21:45 UTC136 viewsread 4 September 2026
Forwarded from @kfestptg

⬇️СПИСОК ПРОШЕДШИХ НОМЕРОВ ⬇️ 📎BOYS 1. ACES (Краснодар) 2. SHABOOM (Черкесск) 3. MOVE B1TCH (Черкесск) 4. Baranix (Ессентуки) 5. VIVACE (Краснодар) 6. OVER1OAD (Пятигорск) 7. DAYGLOW (Сочи) 8. OH YES (Ставрополь) 9. NETwork (Сочи) 10. CRESCENDO (Краснодар) 11. Лютые (Ипатово) 12. RIVALS (Краснодар) 13. PHANTOM (Краснодар) 14. SALTEAMTO (Сочи) 15. E_QUEE (Краснодар) 16. f:kers (Пятигорск) 17. TO MOON (Сочи) 18. LIMI

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @imperium_c_a. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ессентуки онлайн 26 КМВ
@essentuki_online · 33,590
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐼𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑢𝑚 𝑐𝑑𝑡” (@imperium_c_a), 106 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imperium_c_a.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.