Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for impffrei.work - Info Kanal

Channel

impffrei.work - Info Kanal

@impffreiwork

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,688subscribers

-75 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001419335165
TypeChannel
Username@impffreiwork
Created8 May 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/impffreiwork

Growth

8,6888,7638,725.56 August 2026 — 8,763 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,763 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,762 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,754 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,737 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,731 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,727 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,716 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,711 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,708 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,703 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,697 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,688 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 34 days, net -75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,677–8,774 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 01:398,688-9
3 Sept 2026, 08:478,697-6
30 Aug 2026, 16:558,703-5
28 Aug 2026, 01:248,708-3
25 Aug 2026, 10:348,711-5
22 Aug 2026, 18:048,716-11
18 Aug 2026, 22:578,727-4
16 Aug 2026, 07:558,731-6
12 Aug 2026, 22:398,737-17
9 Aug 2026, 11:518,754-8
6 Aug 2026, 13:278,762-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:178,763no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:528,763first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.3%
avg views ÷ 8,688 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,500
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.798%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held33 (6 July 202624 August 2026)
Views total15,045
Reactions total120
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
46m 17s
Average length
2m 43s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

343 reactions across 31 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯8324.2%
👍7120.7%
4814.0%
🤣257.29%
🤬226.41%
🤮195.54%
🤡164.66%
🔥144.08%
👏133.79%
😁72.04%
🏆61.75%
❤‍🔥41.17%
🤷‍♀41.17%
🎉20.583%
💩20.583%
🤔20.583%
👎10.292%
😘10.292%
😱10.292%
🤪10.292%
1 further kind10.292%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 343 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC703 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @Yoicenet2Video

Als ich die Audiodatei hörte, glaubte ich sofort, Alan Watts zu erkennen. Doch dafür fand ich keine verlässliche Quelle – möglicherweise handelt es sich sogar um eine KI-geklonte Stimme. Aber das ändert nichts an der Stärke des Textes. Denn der Text berührt einen Gedanken, mit dem sich Philosophen seit Jahrhunderten beschäftigen: Die Suche nach Wahrheit öffnet nicht immer Türen. Manchmal schließt sie welche. Sie sc

8💯3

22 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC870 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @Yoicenet2Video

"Alles in unserer Geschichte hat uns darauf vorbereitet, ein Gefängnis zu erkennen und uns dagegen zu wehren, wenn sich seine Tore um uns zu schließen beginnen … Doch was, wenn keine Schreie der Qual zu hören sind? Wer ist darauf vorbereitet, gegen ein Meer von Vergnügungen zu den Waffen zu greifen? Bei wem sollen wir uns beklagen – und wann und in welchem Ton –, wenn sich ernsthafter Diskurs in Gekicher auflöst? Was

👍96

21 Aug 2026, 17:37 UTC≈2,800 views24 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

https://www.instagram.com/alederothschild/

💯13👏4🔥4💩2😁1

18 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC≈1,350 views19 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @UnregierbarPhoto

Moral braucht kein Gesetzbuch Gute Menschen brauchen kein Gesetz, um zu wissen, dass Raub falsch ist. Dass Gewalt falsch ist. Dass Betrug falsch ist. Dass Zwang falsch ist. Und schlechte Menschen? Die brechen Gesetze sowieso, sobald es ihnen nützt. Also wozu noch Papier verschwenden? Weil Gesetze selten dazu dienen, moralischen Menschen Moral beizubringen. Sie dienen dazu, Herrschaft zu organisieren. Sie de

👍11🏆61❤‍🔥1

18 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC≈1,030 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Die Nachrichtendienst-Reform 2026: Das Auto als Datenquelle für BND und Verfassungsschutz Die Bundesregierung hat am 12. August 2026 einen weitreichenden Gesetzentwurf zur Reform des Nachrichtendienstrechts beschlossen, der die Beziehung zwischen Autofahrern und staatlichen Behörden grundlegend verändert. Kernstück der Pläne ist die verpflichtende Herausgabe von Telemetriedaten durch Fahrzeughersteller und Kfz-Wer

🤮5🤬42🤷‍♀1

18 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC862 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @UnregierbarPhoto

Das Auto war einmal ein Symbol von Freiheit. Heute wird es zunehmend zum rollenden Sensor: Standort, Routen, Geschwindigkeit, Kameras, Nutzungsverhalten und technische Daten werden permanent erfasst. Und nun soll im Rahmen der Nachrichtendienst-Reform offenbar auch der Zugriff von Verfassungsschutz und BND auf solche Fahrzeugdaten erleichtert werden. So verschiebt sich die Grenze Stück für Stück: Erst entstehen Dat

🤬7🤮31🤷‍♀1

17 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC≈2,760 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Der digitale Euro: Ihr Geld mit Verfallsdatum! Willkommen beim digitalen Euro, bei dem Ihr Geld Ihnen nicht mehr gehört, sondern Ihnen lediglich geliehen wird … mit einem Verfallsdatum. Die EU-Entwürfe sind ein Albtraum, der direkt aus Orwells Schublade stammt: Artikel 7: Händler MÜSSEN den digitalen Euro akzeptieren. Bargeld? Es wird schrittweise abgeschafft. Artikel 13: Verfallsdatum für Ihr Geld. Wenn Sie es n

🤣4🎉21🤬1

14 Aug 2026, 21:25 UTC≈1,400 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @antiautoritaere_aktionVideo

Es ist simpel. @antiautoritaere_aktion

9

12 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC≈1,600 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @Yoicenet2

Ich habe zwei KI-Prompts hinsichtlich der partiellen Sonnenfinsternis heute Abend erstellt. Zum einen (oben) den vollkommen korrekten Prompt, der das Phänomen so abbilden soll, wie wir es heute Abend erleben. Der lautet: "Prompt: Fotografisch realistische partielle Sonnenfinsternis Fotorealistische Aufnahme einer partiellen Sonnenfinsternis kurz vor Sonnenuntergang. Die helle Sonnenscheibe erscheint teilweise verd

👍43

10 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,470 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Was ist eigentlich der Unterschied zwischen einem „theoretischen Anarchisten“ und dem Anarchismus als politischer bzw. philosophischer Denkrichtung? Der Unterschied ist mindestens genauso gewaltig wie bei der Analogie zwischen einem theoretischen Physiker und der Physik als wissenschaftlicher Disziplin. Ad hoc kann ich keinen Physiker benennen, der nicht zumindest irgendwo im Kleingedruckten darauf hinweist, dass e

👏2

9 Aug 2026, 13:57 UTC≈1,730 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Der französische Anwalt Juan Branco: Wenn der Mossad an Ihrem Handy herumspielt und versehentlich Tausende von Kontakten einspeist, anstatt sie zu extrahieren – darunter die echten Telefonnummern von Musk, Altman und fast allen führenden Persönlichkeiten aus Politik, Justiz und Geheimdiensten ... Diese Kampagne wird heiß hergehen 🔗QUELLE ➡️ Juan Branco ✊

😁51

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @impffreiwork. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“impffrei.work - Info Kanal” (@impffreiwork), 8,688 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/impffreiwork.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.