Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Impfkritik: Infokanal übers Impfen | Gesundheit Medizin Forschung Studien Impfung

Channel

Impfkritik: Infokanal übers Impfen | Gesundheit Medizin Forschung Studien Impfung

@impfkritischKanal

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,157subscribers

-126 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001441036193
TypeChannel
Username@impfkritischKanal
Descriptiont.me/impfkritischKanal Wir möchten Euch mit Dokumenten und Medien informieren rund ums Thema #Impfen. Diskussionen in der Gruppe: t.me/impfkritisch
Created8 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/impfkritischKanal

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,1576,2906,223.56 August 2026 — 6,283 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,283 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,282 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,289 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,285 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,290 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,280 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,281 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,277 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,269 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,262 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,254 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,250 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,240 subscribers24 September 2026 — 6,229 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,221 subscribers10 October 2026 — 6,199 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,193 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,190 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,181 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,171 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,170 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,162 subscribers6 November 2026 — 6,157 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 92 days, net -126. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,137–6,310 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 07:306,157-5
3 Nov 2026, 11:516,162-8
31 Oct 2026, 04:006,170-1
27 Oct 2026, 18:396,171-10
20 Oct 2026, 23:106,181-9
17 Oct 2026, 14:556,190-3
14 Oct 2026, 11:316,193-6
10 Oct 2026, 15:426,199-22
4 Oct 2026, 17:356,221-8
24 Sept 2026, 20:416,229-11
16 Sept 2026, 23:426,240-10
12 Sept 2026, 23:406,250-4
9 Sept 2026, 06:556,254-8
4 Sept 2026, 01:586,262-7
31 Aug 2026, 14:036,269-8
24 Aug 2026, 23:146,277-4
21 Aug 2026, 20:366,281+1
18 Aug 2026, 14:236,280-10
15 Aug 2026, 15:446,290+5
12 Aug 2026, 05:256,285first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.4%
avg views ÷ 6,157 subscribers
Avg views / post
951
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.448%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026
Posts held45 (11 July 2026 – 31 October 2026)
Views total18,066
Reactions total77
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 16:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,030
Videos
≈1,460
Links
≈6,550

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
24m 44s
Average length
1m 54s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

180 reactions across 35 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7843.3%
👍4927.2%
🔥179.44%
🤮105.56%
🤬95.00%
😱63.33%
💩42.22%
💯31.67%
🙏31.67%
👌10.556%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 31 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

31 Oct 2026, 09:13 UTC≈2,270 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

HEILIGE SCHEIßE 🚨 Robert F. Kennedy Jr. enthüllt, dass die Leiter der CDC seit Jahrzehnten Wissenschaftler angewiesen haben, DATEN zu vernichten, die belegen, dass Impfungen Autismus verursachen, und dann falsche Ergebnisse zu veröffentlichen. LESEN SIE DAS NOCHMALS. RFK Jr.: „Ich werde Ihnen nur ein Beispiel nennen, und ich könnte hier stundenlang bleiben und Ihnen Tausende nennen. Aber im Jahr 2002 führte die CDC…

❤5😱1

30 Oct 2026, 20:50 UTC559 views5 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @ITundSicherheit

⚠️Achtung Android-Benutzer⚠️ SMS of Death Wie eine unsichtbare Nachricht Android lahmlegt 😭Normalerweise gilt bei Phishing: „Klick einfach nicht auf dubiose Links, dann passiert nichts.“ Doch bei sogenannten Zero-Click-Angriffen fällt diese Schutzregel weg. ℹ️ Du musst weder eine Datei öffnen noch auf eine Nachricht tippen – der Empfang allein reicht. Genau so ein Fall sorgt gerade in der Tech-Welt für Aufsehen: Ei…

❤5

29 Oct 2026, 18:06 UTC596 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @uncut_newsPhoto

Laut einer Studie an Sarkomzellen weist Curcumin ein ausgewogenes Profil bei der Krebsbekämpfung auf Analyse von Dr. Joseph Mercola Die Geschichte auf einen Blick - In einer Laborstudie der Medizinischen Universität Breslau wurden fünf Pflanzenstoffe – Curcumin, Berberin, Biochanin A, Cucurbitacin E und CAPE –… https://uncutnews.ch/laut-einer-studie-an-sarkomzellen-weist-curcumin-ein-ausgewogenes-profil-bei-der-k…

❤2

28 Oct 2026, 11:27 UTC720 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @weedseeds4unewsPhoto

Gesundheitskürzungen 2027: Weiter Beiträge zahlen – aber wer behandelt dich noch? Dein Arzt hört auf. Die nächste Praxis nimmt niemanden mehr auf. Die übernächste auch nicht. Viel Erfolg. Besonders dort, wo es ohnehin kaum Ärzte gibt. Während zusätzliche Behandlungen stärker unter Budgetdruck geraten, verschwinden Zuschläge für schnelle Termine. Beim Zahnersatz sinkt der Zuschuss. Zuzahlungen steigen. Deinen Versiche…

🤬2

28 Oct 2026, 10:51 UTC676 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MHieOAH2AJM

👍2

28 Oct 2026, 10:51 UTC584 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Lawfare vor Gericht: 🚨 WER EIN SYSTEM SCHÜTZT, DAS MENSCHENOPFER IN KAUF NIMMT UND BETROFFENE ABSERVIERT, STEHT AUF DER FALSCHEN SEITE DER GERECHTIGKEIT! 🚨 🚨 WER UNRECHT SCHÜTZT, WIRD SELBST ZUM TEIL DES UNRECHTS! 🚨Systematischer Schutz für Konzerne statt Recht für Geschädigte Rechtsanwalt Tobias Ulbrich bringt es glasklar auf den Punkt – und was er beschreibt, deckt sich zu 100 % mit dem, was ich seit Jahren in den…

👍1

28 Oct 2026, 10:49 UTC577 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Interview mit Helmut Sterz. Jetzt redet der Ex-Pfizer. Der Ex-Pfizer-Mitarbeiter, Toxikologe und mehrfacher Buchautor Dr. Helmut Sterz im Interview mit Stef Manzini über das größte organisierte Verbrechen gegen die Menschheit: die „Corona-Impfung“. Mit Dr. Helmut Sterz starten wir ganz bewusst die Berichterstattung über die „Corona-Transparents-und Sicherheitskonferenz“ der „Patriots-Foundation“, die am 21. Oktober…

❤2🔥1

28 Oct 2026, 10:47 UTC570 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

15-Jährige nach Covid-Spritze verstorben:⚠️Jetzt muss BioNTech Auskunft erteilen! Erfolg im Drama! Im Fall eines 15-jährigen Mädchens, das nach einer Covid-Injektion verstarb, hat ihre Mutter einen wichtigen juristischen Etappenerfolg erzielt. Wie die Fachanwältin für Medizinrecht Beate Bahner berichtet, verpflichtete das Oberlandesgericht Bamberg BioNTech erstmals dazu, Auskunft über seine Covid-Spritze zu erteilen…

🔥4🤬1😱1

28 Oct 2026, 10:11 UTC609 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Wie wirksam ist die #Masernimpfung? Marvin vom NEXT LEVEL-Team zu Gast beim Facharzt Bastian Hölscher. Das ganze Interview kannst du in seiner Community schauen: https://www.instagram.com/bastianhoelscher/ Hinterfrage, was als gesichert gilt. Frag NEXIQA – die kritischste KI & Community der Welt. 🌐 Web 📱 iOS 📱 Android

👍2

27 Oct 2026, 21:33 UTC≈2,310 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026

https://tkp.at/2026/10/24/herzschaeden-durch-infraschall-von-windraedern-mainzer-studie-jetzt-offiziell-im-springer-fachorgan/

🤬1

27 Oct 2026, 21:32 UTC625 views7 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Sechs Maskenatteste – Hausdurchsuchung, Geldstrafe und bis heute Kampf um die Approbation Perin Dinekli ist Fachärztin für Allgemeinmedizin aus Offenburg mit Behandlungsschwerpunkt klassische Homöopathie. Während der Corona-Zeit stellte sie Patienten Bescheinigungen zur Befreiung von der Maskenpflicht aus. Die Staatsanwaltschaft warf ihr schließlich vor, in sechs Fällen unrichtige Gesundheitszeugnisse ausgestellt z…

❤3🤮3🙏1

27 Oct 2026, 21:28 UTC783 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

‼️HAMMERMELDUNG‼️ Wolfgang Wodarg auf X: Weshalb ist bei gleicher Spritzenzahl die Übersterblichkeit in Deutschland sehr hoch und beim neuen NATO-Mitglied Schweden gleich null? Die Spritzen-Pandemie war ein gezieltes und international verabredetes gentechnischen Massenexperiment mit Hilfe des Militärs. Was wir von Anfang an gesehen und vermutet haben, wurde jetzt durch ein interdisziplinäres Team in den USA bestät…

❤4🤬1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @impfkritischKanal. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Anwälte-für-Aufklärung
@Anwaelte_fuer_Aufklaerung · 47,911
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Impfkritik: Infokanal übers Impfen | Gesundheit Medizin Forschung Studien Impfung” (@impfkritischKanal), 6,157 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/impfkritischKanal.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.