Photo, posted without a caption
custom 58525464759086653955custom 58502333053072868264custom 58501765988540782173custom 58504056108052683153

Channel
@imsoreader
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,097subscribers
+546 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003726422280 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @imsoreader |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/imsoreader |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 1,097 | +82 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 1,015 | +330 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:57 | 685 | +12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:28 | 673 | +20 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 653 | +31 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 622 | +72 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 550 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 551 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:40 | 551 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
321 reactions across 17 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5850233305307286826 | 93 | 29.0% | |
| custom 5866442224119582107 | 48 | 15.0% | |
| custom 5850300345451810413 | 42 | 13.1% | |
| custom 5852546475908665395 | 40 | 12.5% | |
| custom 5773652573835758861 | 36 | 11.2% | |
| custom 5850405610805268315 | 32 | 9.97% | |
| custom 5850176598854078217 | 19 | 5.92% | |
| custom 5852598062760857634 | 11 | 3.43% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 321 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 58525464759086653955custom 58502333053072868264custom 58501765988540782173custom 58504056108052683153
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 58502333053072868268custom 57736525738357588614custom 58525464759086653954
Хрупкость 3,2/5 Кортни Л. Уинн Давайте с плюсов: 1. Интересная идея. Есть кольца-сосуды, в них находятся сущности, которые объединяются с хозяином и даруют ему различные способности. С этими духами можно сплетничать и все такое, прикольно 2. Все эти души, духи, боги, сущности, хранители и т.д делают мир оригинальным 3. Тут интересно прописаны отношения дочери с отцом, да и вообще есть ряд интересных мелочей Теперь…
custom 58504056108052683159custom 58503003454518104136custom 58525980627608576344
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 58664422241195821078custom 58501765988540782175
Кто что купил сегодня? Я эти
custom 585030034545181041317custom 58502333053072868265custom 58664422241195821072
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 58502333053072868268custom 58525980627608576343custom 58503003454518104131
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 58502333053072868269custom 57736525738357588614custom 58664422241195821074
Думали бесплатный день? Смешные такие)
custom 585254647590866539520
Я решила во что бы то ни стало добить сегодня Хрупкость⚔️ Если мне будет что сказать во время прочтения, буду писать об этом в комментариях к этому посту. Если вы тоже читаете, приглашаю сюда обсирать обсуждать😛
custom 585017659885407821711custom 58664422241195821077
Имею бешеное желание бросить Хрупокость и Серпентарий😬 Первую - потому что чушь какая-то, несмотря на очень интересную задумку. Вторую - по абсолютно иррациональным причинам формата "да прост". Лори на паузе пока не получу свою прелесть за сумасшедшие тыщи, зря я потратилась чтоли? Как говорится, вот такая вот хуйня, собачка. 0 книг прочитано в августе😭 Ей богу, лучше Тех немногих, что несут тьму читать, чем не чит…
custom 586644222411958210726
Это сегодня, мои хорошие❤️
custom 585023330530728682611custom 57736525738357588614custom 58503003454518104133
Вдруг кто-то искал, успевайте https://www.avito.ru/vladikavkaz/knigi_i_zhurnaly/mrachnyy_vzvod_podarochnoe_izdanie_8267319456?utm_campaign=native&utm_medium=item_page_ios&utm_source=soc_sharing
custom 58503003454518104137
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @imsoreader. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лера Imsoreader” (@imsoreader), 1,097 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/imsoreader.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.