现在咱更加怀疑了。
Channel
Think Independent
@independenthinking
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001868547056 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @independenthinking |
| Created | 13 November 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 2 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/independenthinking |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:26 | 4 | no change |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:00 | 4 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 13 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2022 to 18 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
我无法确认咱说过的这句话的真实性. 因为咱在外部, 看不到里面的样子.
抽象的社会孕育抽象的人 抽象的人在逼着下一代人抽象
我本来以为这个频道的最后一次更新应该停留在上一条了,没想到最近又出来了这么大的瓜。 本人始终认为,在讨论战争的时候,不应该把普通民众也划归在内。 战争永远不是民众决定的。 相信各位也应该看到过俄罗斯,或是乌克兰的士兵牺牲在俄乌战线上的影片或图像。或者是俄罗斯或乌克兰的反战人士的活动。 问问,这些士兵,他们是自愿的吗? 如果不是,那么强加战争罪行给他们也应该是一桩罪行。 说实话,本人一直认为既然选择了 Open-Source 这项可以称得上是崇高的事业,那么类似于这种地缘政治之类的就本不应该成为问题。 但是贡献者总是有国籍的。也是被教育起来的。 就比如说当年 NP++ 的所谓“描述中国”事件。因为他获取的信息就是这样的。 说实话,在我说出这些话的时候,可能我也受制于我所接触到的信息,因此无法理解为什么会出现这种事情。 但这其实也是这个频道名字的来源。 说实话,我可能一直是站在一个过于乌托邦的角度看这些问题并提出这些批评的。 …
本频已死,来者勿念。
🙏1
而我甚至看到有考心理咨询师当外快的广告...消防工程师,安全工程师我也就忽略了,他妈拿人心开玩笑那我只能祝他们全家早日死光。
绝了
现在可以破窗了。
频道主当时还对此抱有希望。现在看起来去他妈的吧。
我是坚定的“无翻车(1)论”者。 我觉得这一句话都在浪费我的时间。 (1)这里的“翻车”就是原始意义的翻车,即“走完不可逆过程之后意识到解剖学性别更不错”的意思。
结果刚说出这话没多久,就来了素材。
頻道主決定將觀測的方面擴張出去。 要不然可能會被別人抓把柄。樂。
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @independenthinking. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Think Independent” (@independenthinking), 4 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/independenthinking.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.