Channel
@infhannahabbot
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002726066066 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @infhannahabbot |
| Created | 12 July 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/infhannahabbot |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 1 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:01 | 1 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 12 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 60.0% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2025 to 19 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔀🤍🌟🦢🤩🤩🤩🤩🦢✨🤍🔀 《🤩》☺️𝐘 🅰️𝐎𝐕𝐄 🦢 𝕬𝖗𝖊𝖘 𝕻𝖊𝖛𝖊𝖗𝖊𝖑𝖑 ⬛⬛❎🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 🔤𝐈𝐒𝐓𝐄𝐑𝐒 ✝::: — 𝕯𝖆𝖕𝖍𝖓𝖊 𝕲𝖗𝖊𝖊𝖓𝖌𝖗𝖆𝖘𝖘 — 𝕲𝖎𝖓𝖓𝖞 𝖂𝖊𝖆𝖘𝖑𝖊𝖞 — 𝕻𝖆𝖗𝖛𝖆𝖙𝖎 𝕻𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖑 — 𝕻𝖆𝖉𝖒𝖆 𝕻𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖑 — 𝕮𝖆𝖘𝖘𝖆𝖓𝖉𝖗𝖆 𝕶𝖓𝖔𝖝 — 𝕸𝖎𝖑𝖑𝖎𝖈𝖊𝖓𝖙 𝕭𝖚𝖑𝖘𝖙𝖗𝖔𝖉𝖊 — 𝕹𝖆𝖗𝖈𝖎𝖘𝖘𝖆 𝕭𝖑𝖆𝖈𝖐 — 𝕸𝖆𝖗𝖌𝖆𝖗𝖊𝖙 𝕬𝖓𝖙𝖔𝖎𝖓𝖊𝖙𝖙𝖊 𝕷𝖊𝖋𝖊𝖇𝖛𝖗𝖊 — 𝕬𝖓𝖌𝖊𝖑𝖎𝖓𝖆 𝕵𝖔𝖍𝖓𝖘𝖔𝖓 — 𝖁𝖎𝖈𝖙𝖔𝖗𝖎𝖆 𝕾𝖒𝖎𝖙𝖍 — 𝕶𝖆𝖙𝖎𝖊 𝕭𝖊𝖑𝖑 🔤𝐑𝐎𝐓𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐒 🦴::: — 𝕮𝖊𝖉𝖗𝖎𝖈 𝕯𝖎𝖌𝖌𝖔𝖗𝖞 — 𝕿𝖍𝖊𝖔𝖉𝖔𝖗𝖊 𝕹𝖔𝖙𝖙 — 𝕰𝖗𝖓𝖎𝖊 𝕸𝖆𝖈𝖒𝖎𝖑𝖑𝖆𝖓 — 𝕽𝖔𝖓 𝖂𝖊𝖆𝖘𝖑𝖊𝖞 — 𝕽𝖊𝖒𝖚𝖘 𝕷𝖚𝖕𝖎𝖓 — 𝕯𝖆𝖓𝖎𝖊𝖑 𝕯𝖆𝖑𝖑𝖆𝖘
❤2🔥2
🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️: 《1》- Делаю с любыми дневниками, из любой вселенной 《2》- Ваш шаблон держу у себя час 《3》- Подписка автора обязательна 《4》- Пишите об предложениях в @Saint_Hannah_bot , сразу с ссылкой на шб
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩➿☦️🎭🙂🔠🫶🤩🅰️🤩 🤩🤩➿🍙🍙🅰️☺️🔤🤩🎭🤩 🤩🤩➿🤍🤍🤍🤍《🔀》 🤩 🤩🤩🤩⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🚩— ☺️отов ли ты, читатель, узреть мою жизнь рабыни Божьей? Мы все грешны, но, может, я переступила черту. ☺️ — Ханна Аббот, из древнего рода чистокровных волшебников, аристократка, о которой шепчутся непорочно в Лондоне. В этом мире искушений и испытаний я продолжаю искать свет и надежду. ☺️можешь ли ты быть со мной, грешник 🤩 🍙🍙🍙🍙🍙🍙🍙🍙🍙🍙🍙 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
❤1
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @infhannahabbot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@infhannahabbot named 12 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“inf.h.a.” (@infhannahabbot), 1 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infhannahabbot.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.