Я подумаю ещё месяц и если что открою
Signed Шнурок

Channel
@info_xienn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
251subscribers
-52 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002865017650 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @info_xienn |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/info_xienn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 10:36 | 251 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 262 | -16 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 278 | -10 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 288 | -14 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:31 | 302 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 303 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 303 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
53 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5438365990528251936 | 13 | 24.5% | |
| custom 5309794576859427365 | 9 | 17.0% | |
| custom 5472079134454740309 | 9 | 17.0% | |
| custom 5350592355240011700 | 6 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5411395618838969304 | 6 | 11.3% | |
| custom 5395381373714329860 | 4 | 7.55% | |
| custom 5433829714789694059 | 4 | 7.55% | |
| custom 5474231905207478981 | 2 | 3.77% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я подумаю ещё месяц и если что открою
Signed Шнурок
Бл, мб обратно
custom 54383659905282519361
Signed Шнурок
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Шнурок
Всем сап🌟 ну я принял решение закрыть флуд. Я понял, что интереса к этому проекту у меня нет, так же как и желания работать. Очень рад был со всеми познакомиться, все мои союзы, все участники которые у меня были вы стали моей большой мотивацией. Но каждому началу приходит конец. Со всеми союзами разрыв, кн и группу удалять не буду. Не знаю буду открывать новый проект или нет, но в ближайшее время точно нет. Патент за…
custom 54383659905282519362
Signed Шнурок
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed Шнурок
🤍HE END? 🔤🔤🔤🔤Yes or No...⭐ Всем привет, думаю давно пора все закончить. Ни у меня, ни у админов нет желания вести этот флуд. У меня нету желания чтсто из за того, что все игнорируют мои слова. Админы не работают, хотя я им постоянно пишу одно и тоже как попугай, честно мне это не надо. После реста актива не от админов не от участников почти нет, все тупо забили на флуд. Так почему все могу забивать на него, а я долж…
custom 53097945768594273655custom 54383659905282519365custom 53953813737143298603custom 53505923552400117002custom 54720791344547403092custom 54113956188389693041custom 54338297147896940591
Signed Шнурок
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed #Шнурковатый¡ˣⁱᵉⁿⁿolv
Our beloved Granddaughter🫶 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🔤Связь между дедушкой и внучкой — это особенная, почти волшебная глава в семейной книге. В ней нет той строгой родительской ответственности за оценки и дисциплину, а есть лишь безусловная любовь, мудрость и огромное количество времени, которое дедушка готов подарить. Это союз поколений, где каждый находит для себя нечто невероятно ценное.Теплые объятия поколений. Для дедушки внуч…
custom 53097945768594273651custom 53505923552400117001custom 53953813737143298601custom 54338297147896940591custom 54383659905282519361custom 54720791344547403091
Signed #Шнурковатый¡ˣⁱᵉⁿⁿolv
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed #Шнурковатый¡ˣⁱᵉⁿⁿolv
Всем привет, у нас прошла чистка, я помолчу🌟 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 🔤🔤🔤🔤Итоги: ➖аны: юнджин ёнджун сан ынче рюджин жизель чимин меган вон бин нин2 чанбин джеймс сакура Сону 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 Если вы влетели не растраивайтесь, вы модете вернуться к нам, но с условием, что вы будете активны!! А сейчас мы ищем активных нью и хороших админов. Писать @dablknottt🌟
Signed #Шнурковатый¡ˣⁱᵉⁿⁿolv
Sticker, posted without a caption
Signed #Шнурковатый¡ˣⁱᵉⁿⁿolv
ㅤִ ᨳ ׁ ᩠ 🎁 ࣪ 𝖵iᧁꫀׁׅꭷִ 𝐗ıִꫀׁׅꪀꪀ 악𔓐ׄ 🌟* 🎀➿ • ➿ •➖✖️➖• ➿ • ➿🎀 Коллаб с любимыми @TINKYINFO_4👅 𝐇ꫀׁׅყ ! https // ִ۫ ᰵᰨ) su๋pꫀr ID :Ours!брать с отметкой: 🇺🇸
custom 53505923552400117003custom 54113956188389693043custom 54383659905282519363custom 54720791344547403092
Signed #Шнурковатый¡ˣⁱᵉⁿⁿolv
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @info_xienn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@info_xienn named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Закрыты !! INFO 𝗫𝗜𝗘𝗡𝗡 𝗙𝗟𝗢𝗢𝗗🇺🇸” (@info_xienn), 251 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/info_xienn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.