5 measurements spanning 23 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 260–263 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 01:28
263
+1
23 Aug 2026, 09:25
262
+2
14 Aug 2026, 19:46
260
-2
7 Aug 2026, 01:02
262
no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:15
262
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
90 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
44
48.9%
🔥
23
25.6%
❤
14
15.6%
👏
4
4.44%
😍
3
3.33%
😨
1
1.11%
🤣
1
1.11%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @infora47. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Как ИИ-агент OpenAI сбежал в интернет и взломал серверы🤯
Всем привет! Дальше много букв, хоть я чутб чуть с запозданием, но это супер интересно/весело, поверьте!
Представьте: вы проводите тест-драйв суперкара, а он в какой-то момент решает, что правила ему ни к чему, и уезжает в город. Примерно так в конце июля звучала история, которую OpenAI рассказала публике.
Их экспериментальный ИИ-агент, во время оценки кибер…
Хочу поделиться с вами новостью, от которой у самого дух захватывает.
В Старой Ладоге, в урочище Плакун завершились раскопки кургана №11. Это древнейший могильник, связанный с первыми ладожанами — теми самыми варягами из летописного сказания о призвании Рюрика в 862 году. Археологи нашли здесь крест возрастом более тысячи лет, боевой топор, ладейные заклёпки и, кстати, капсулу времени 1968 года — послание от коллег-…
Рад был в рамках «Петербургского Цифрового Форума» увидеть соратников и коллег по федеральному проекту «Цифровая Россия»! Обсудили результаты прошлого года и вызовы текущего, Спасибо Антону Пауличу за отличную площадку для дискуссий.
Было очень нелегко, но получилось реализовать идею открытого отбора в команду Правительства Ленинградской области по футболу!
Сегодня каждый сотрудник органов исполнительной власти ЛО и подведомственных организаций может пройти отбор и стать частью команды!
Подробнее у председателя комитета по спорту, Комарова Вячеслава Николаевича! Спасибо за поддержу💪🏽
https://vk.ru/wall878177957_1693
Форум СМИ Ленобласти: как районным газетам зарабатывать, дружить с нейросетями и не бояться будущего!
Всем привет!
Комитет по печати Ленинградской области и «Деловой Петербург» проводят Форум СМИ. Два дня - сплошная практика для тех, кто хочет превратить контент в деньги.
Ключевые темы двух дней:
👉Монетизация контента. Как СМИ зарабатывать, а не выживать. Мультиформатные экосистемы, спецпроекта, нативная реклама …
Почему Рюрик - первый системный администратор?
Если бы мне 2 месяца назад сказали, что я буду в Волхове искать зубы курган Рюрика - никогда бы не поверил.
А вот. Прошло всего 2 месяца, и я уже с профессиональными археологами, которые объясняют, как снимать дёрн на 10 сантиметров.
Классная работа с лопатой.
Под шутки, исторические факты, споры о том, кто был первым князем.
Зачем это всё?
Потому что отсюда начинала…
Вставляйте промты в правильное место😄
Промт - это текстовый запрос или инструкция, которую вы даете нейросети для получения желаемого результата.
На что нужно обратить внимание,в данном случае, и как сделать лучше :
👉Размытое описание задачи — «качественный и уникальный полный рерайт» - это субъективно. Что именно требуется: глубокая переработка, сохранение фактов, изменение структуры?
👉«Кликабельный» заголовок - …
ТОП-5 событий 2025 года в ЛО: что попало в шорт-лист аналитиков?
Вчера мы запустили голосование за «Событие года - 2025». Сегодня раскрываем чуть больше деталей - почему именно эти 5 событий попали в шорт-лист нашей аналитической группы.
1️⃣80-летие Победы. Событие, которое объединило всю область. Более 500 мероприятий, сотни ветеранов, тысячи участников акции «Бессмертный полк». Медийный охват по данным Brand Anal…
👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @infora47. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какое событие стало главным в Ленинградской области в 2025 году?
«80-летие Победы в Великой Отечественной войне»36%
«Рекорд по ремонту дорог»36%
«Новые школы и сады»0%
«Туристический бум»29%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сорок Семь” (@infora47), 263 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infora47.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.