Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for INFO VAX 🇨🇱

Channel

INFO VAX 🇨🇱

@infovax

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

40subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002085881015
TypeChannel
Username@infovax
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 27 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/infovax

Growth

404140.57 August 2026 — 41 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41 subscribers21 August 2026 — 40 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 14 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–41 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 21:3740-1
10 Aug 2026, 18:1741no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:3541first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 27 May 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
15m 42s
Average length
5m 14s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

11 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1090.9%
😁19.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2024 to 14 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Mar 2025, 16:47 UTC100 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

📊📜 Volante Tríptico ¦ Gráfico Mortalidad Por Todas Las Causas Asociada Al Pinchazo "Covid" + Gráfico Virtual Desaparición Influenza 2020 🔖 Imágenes Mejor Resolución & PDF 🚩Documentos Generados Para Imprimir En Hoja Tamaño Carta. Ideal Para Informar Los Datos Base Del Genocidio Encubierto pLandemia Covid. ♦️ Éstos precisoss datos son claros y sin sesgo. No hubo ni pandemia ni virus y ésto es material suficiente par

1 Jun 2024, 20:28 UTC544 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

#volantes #graficos #chile #tripticos #estadisticas #mortalidad #MTC #timotest #pcr #testanticuerpos #testantigenos #novirus #influenzas #sarscov2 #fraudevirologia #genocidio

👍5

1 Jun 2024, 20:28 UTC880 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

📊🤩🤩📜 Volante Tríptico ¦ Gráfico Mortalidad Por Todas Las Causas Asociada Al Pinchazo "Covid" + Gráfico Virtual Desaparición Influenza 2020 🔖 Imágenes Mejor Resolución & PDF 🚩Documentos Generados Para Imprimir En Hoja Tamaño Carta. Ideal Para Informar Los Datos Base Del Genocidio Encubierto pLandemia Covid. ⭕️ Esta información basada en unos de los datos mas duros disponibles forma un sólido cmiento sobre el cuál i

👍4

27 May 2024, 01:58 UTC≈1,220 viewsread 10 August 2026

📊🗺| Nuevos Datos De Medicare Dejan Claro Que Las Vacunas Covid Han Matado A Millones De Personas En Todo El Mundo ¦ Steve Kirsch, 2024 Ene 14 🔖 https://telegra.ph/Nuevos-Datos-De-Medicare-Dejan-Claro-Que-Las-Vacunas-Covid-Han-Matado-A-Millones-De-Personas-En-Todo-El-Mundo-05-23 *️⃣Que quede perfectamente claro: nadie en el mundo está seguro de que las vacunas salven vidas. Todavía tengo una APUESTA DE UN MILLÓN DE

27 May 2024, 01:55 UTC75 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @healthbestPhoto

LOS SANITARIOS ANTIVACUNAS Cuando dirigía el programa Vivir con Salud comentaba que algún día todos seríamos antivacunas, porque o te plantas tú (con las vacunas) o te planta tu cuerpo (como, por desgracia, estamos viendo con las muertes súbitas y los turbo cánceres). Aquí tenemos las estadísticas del rechazo de los sanitarios a cada dosis de vacuna del COVID-19 en Reino Unido. Primera dosis: 8,8% (88,000) se neg

27 May 2024, 01:55 UTC64 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

¡¡¡Que buena noticia!!!! Cifras de la campaña de vacunación SARS-CoV-2 entre los años 2023 y 2024 para los distintos grupos objetivos. Las embarazadas sacando la cara 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Miren al personal de salud!!!!! 👍 El ministerio de Salud con tragedia.

😁1

27 May 2024, 01:54 UTC63 viewsread 10 August 2026

Del Departamento de Estadisticas e Información de Salud o DEIS. Dejo link: https://informesdeis.minsal.cl/SASVisualAnalytics/?reportUri=%2Freports%2Freports%2F8e9feedf-63e7-4cc8-8c43-c7d7d31efe97&sectionIndex=0&sso_guest=true&reportViewOnly=true&reportContextBar=false&sas-welcome=false

27 May 2024, 01:53 UTC69 viewsread 10 August 2026

CHILE bajo Plan de Exterminio ONU OMS-Gates ✞ EXCESO DE MUERTES 65.593 ✞ Dic. 2023 Acum - 16.770 ✞ inicio VAX (5G e intubacion) 48.823 ✞ por Vacunación 18.088.517 Vacunados a feb.2023 1 MUERTE cada 370 VACUNADOS https://datosmacro.expansion.com/otros/coronavirus-vacuna/chile https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/cumulative-excess-deaths-covid?time=earliest..2023-12-31&country=~CHL Fuente dat

27 May 2024, 01:52 UTC68 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @PLANDEMIA_MUNDIAL_COVIDVideo

El Dr. Paul Thomas hace explotar la narrativa de la vacuna convencional con datos asombrosos. Los datos del grupo de control - Vacunados / No vacunados: • Condiciones Crónicas - 60% / 5.71% • Artritis - 16,67 % / 0 % • Enfermedad del corazón - 48% / 0% • Diabetes - 10% / 0% • Asma - 7,7 % / 0 % • Autismo - 2.5% / 0% • TDAH - 9,4 % / 0,47 % • Cáncer - 6,0% / 0% Al final del video muestra el desastre de las inyeccio

27 May 2024, 01:50 UTC≈1,670 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

📊🎙| Brian Hooker, Estudios Sobre Autismo, Estadísticas «Vacunados vs No Vacunados» 🚩Ante la falta de voluntad de los CDC para realizar estudios de comparación a largo plazo entre niños vacunados y no vacunados, el Dr. Hooker se encargó de reunirlos y efectuarlos. ℹ️ video fuente ───────── #estadisticas #autismo #gruposdecontrol #cdc #eeuu

👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @infovax. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“INFO VAX 🇨🇱” (@infovax), 40 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/infovax.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.