Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ИнкVиZиция 👀

Channel

ИнкVиZиция 👀

@inkViZiciaDPR

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

351subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003830332331
TypeChannel
Username@inkViZiciaDPR
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 29 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/inkViZiciaDPR

Growth

347360353.57 August 2026 — 347 subscribers8 August 2026 — 347 subscribers14 August 2026 — 349 subscribers22 August 2026 — 360 subscribers28 August 2026 — 356 subscribers5 September 2026 — 353 subscribers13 September 2026 — 351 subscribers3517 August 202613 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 345–362 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Sept 2026, 20:21351-2
5 Sept 2026, 03:15353-3
28 Aug 2026, 15:23356-4
22 Aug 2026, 13:24360+11
14 Aug 2026, 16:58349+2
8 Aug 2026, 06:49347no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:31347first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

97 reactions across 18 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁1616.5%
🤝1515.5%
🔥1414.4%
💯1111.3%
👍1010.3%
77.22%
🥰77.22%
55.15%
🫡55.15%
🤔44.12%
🤷‍♀22.06%
👀11.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 19:08 UTC111 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Няша и Профессор желают сладких снов ✨

🤝42

4 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC121 viewsread 8 August 2026

Что произошло с военнослужащим, предстоит разобраться следователям. но ничто не может служить оправданием убийства своих же мирных сограждан... https://t.me/vesty_vedomstv/10957

4 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC121 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Читая приведённую публикацию, ловлю себя на мысли, что описанные преступления уже воспринимаются как обыденность... Не могу не отметить отличную работу правоохранительных органов по сбору и фиксации доказательств 🧾 Принцип неотвратимости наказания в действии. А сколько таких марущенков еще гуляет на свободе и убивает солдат?.. В случае, если Вам стали известны подобные факты, незамедлительно сообщайте в СК или ФСБ ‼️

👍4

4 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC145 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот и факт "отмывания репутации" подтвердился прокурорской проверкой. Работайте, братья🤙

🔥62

3 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC141 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сладких снов ❤️ от банды шерстяных 💋

🥰7

3 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC147 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

А вот Абрикосович у нас молодец - он не посещает эти заведения и бухает только наедине с собой. С бытовой точки зрения, он просто "тихий пьяница", но когда у такого персонажа доступ к документам, определяющим судьбу бойцов, приятного мало... Да и следователю наркологическую экспертизу проводить придётся при расследовании уголовного дела о превышении должностных полномочий 😁 Если и получилось у господина Абрикосовича

😁4💯2

3 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC144 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В свете последних событий, не лишим будет освежить в памяти Закон Российской Федерации "О государственной тайне", который, как и Правила дорожного движения, написан кровью. В период СВО подразделения по защите гостайны как-то сосредоточились на изъятии телефонов у рядовых бойцов. Рекомендую обратить внимание на замполитов и их прихвостней, может, получится первыми найти какой-нибудь БДСМ-притон "массажный салон" 🤔

👍4

3 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC148 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В телеграм-каналах уже обсудили произошедшее с точки зрения морали и физической безопасности. В комментариях многие высказали недовольство о банкетах в тылу, в то время, когда бойцы в окопах без ротации. Но это имеет место быть не только в далекой от ЛБС Москвы, в Донецке в полне себе успешно функционируют как минимум два мерзопакстнейших заведения, где любят проводить досуг в поисках острых ощущений мелкие паркетные

💯7👍21

3 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC146 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Добрейшего утречка ☕ и привет от друга канала из Таганрога. Кто знает, зачем бобру "шарик-молчун", пишите в комментариях 💬

1🔥1

2 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC158 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

День железнодорожника совпал в этом году с днём ВДВ 🪂

🤝4

2 Aug 2026, 05:09 UTC174 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

С праздником всех причастных и доброго утречка ☕

🫡52😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @inkViZiciaDPR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ИнкVиZиция 👀” (@inkViZiciaDPR), 351 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inkViZiciaDPR.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.