Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Їм, молюсь, люблю💕

Channel

Їм, молюсь, люблю💕

@inna_buturlim

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

287subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001633702491
TypeChannel
Username@inna_buturlim
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/inna_buturlim

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2872912898 August 2026 — 287 subscribers8 August 2026 — 287 subscribers16 August 2026 — 291 subscribers30 August 2026 — 290 subscribers18 September 2026 — 287 subscribers8 August 202618 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 42 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 286–292 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:38287-3
30 Aug 2026, 10:07290-1
16 Aug 2026, 01:43291+4
8 Aug 2026, 08:19287no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:15287first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

252 reactions across 7 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤11646.0%
😢3011.9%
😁2911.5%
❤‍🔥218.33%
🙏187.14%
🔥166.35%
💔62.38%
😱51.98%
💯41.59%
⚡31.19%
👍20.794%
🤯20.794%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 252 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 08:03 UTC133 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

«Так не роби, і все..» Ви чули таке? Особисто я дуже часто, але не можу не робити. Бо ніхто не пропонує «не роби, я за тебе зроблю». Я не можу не готуватися до зими, я хочу прибрати хату поки в мене відпустка і є на це час. Комусь треба зараз робити всі інші справи, бо мій чоловік випав фізично. Зараз я не зроблю і потім буду жалкувати. І стає неприємно просто від нерозуміння цього. Відпускати легко тільки на словах.…

❤22❤‍🔥3

28 Jul 2026, 07:56 UTC192 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Інколи життя потребує того, щоб прибрати зайве, щоб ти змогла видихнути і тобі стало легше❤️‍🩹 Треба вчитися відпускати речі та людей і цінувати те, що справжнє 🩷

❤28⚡3👍2

26 Jul 2026, 18:53 UTC200 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Скоріш за все вам теж в дитинстві казали, що гостей треба кликати тоді, коли в хаті чисто. або ці всі «от прийдуть твої друзі і побачать твій безлад», або прибирання під девізом «раптом хтось прийде». І от десь у мене жилО, що прибирати перед гостями. і коли є сили — я це роблю, мені приємно, коли їм приємно знаходитися у нас вдома. Але з часом я перестала так багато уваги приділяти порядку, просто через те, що зрозу…

❤30💔6

26 Jul 2026, 10:10 UTC173 views38 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Чоловік, коли побачив мій процес розхламлення на кухні: «Я чекав цього все своє життя 😍😂»

😁29❤5🔥4

26 Jul 2026, 09:09 UTC177 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Ви думали я забула про свій челендж? Ага. Тепер він ще більше нам потрібний! Мені на це пішло три дні, але тепер в кімнаті чисто, навіть в шафі і шухлядах 🥹🩷 Одяг мені перебрала подружка 🤝 Мої відчуття: Рівень емоційного та візуального шуму знизився і наче легше стало дихати. Я люблю все що було до, але зараз воно шкодить більше ніж надихає. Кожний раз заходячи в кімнату - мій мозок чиплявся за щось і аналізував/чит…

❤12🔥12❤‍🔥5💯4

25 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTC183 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Маршрут перебудовано🩼🗺️ Але ми радіємо що ми живі і разом! Бог вчить відмовлятися від наших планів, і ми віримо, що Його план кращий 🙏🏻 Дякуємо всім за підтримку 🩷

❤18❤‍🔥13🙏6🤯2

24 Jul 2026, 15:17 UTC197 views48 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Хочете не смішний прикол? 😅 Мій чоловік весь цей час бере на себе більшу частину обовʼязків по хаті, з дитиною майже весь час грається, навчання по магістратурі, табір, служіння в церкві, ще й в своєму домі купа роботи (косити,кропити виноград), ремонтувати машину, і зараз в нього мало б бути хрещення і ще один табір дитячий ііііііі…. Вчора він незручно повернув ногу, вона одразу напухла, боліла дико, але ж #вінмужик…

😢30🙏12😱5❤1

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @inna_buturlim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Їм, молюсь, люблю💕” (@inna_buturlim), 287 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inna_buturlim.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.