Channel
@inrxfoundation
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
351subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001315451536 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @inrxfoundation |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/inrxfoundation |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 351 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:47 | 352 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 354 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:52 | 356 | -4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 360 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 360 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
INRx pinned «Important Announcement 📣 From April 21 app will temporary can’t be access for few days as per FIU- India regulatory Re number formation of INRx Pay after formation we release it in production and make boom in market so please don’t deposit in that duration…»
Important Announcement 📣 From April 21 app will temporary can’t be access for few days as per FIU- India regulatory Re number formation of INRx Pay after formation we release it in production and make boom in market so please don’t deposit in that duration if deposit make patience for few Times
Crypto backed Credit Card is adoptable ?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Why sell your crypto at a loss? Secure your financial flexibility with a crypto-backed credit card. Access the funds you need without compromising your investment potential.
Update your app support section enable
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inrx.utility&hl=en-US&ah=Imb2MRnsHqeZDV5QcpquhELD9oc Available on play store
File, posted without a caption
Update app
INRx pinned «Apple user now can download INRX app https://testflight.apple.com/join/MXpuzRZA»
Apple user now can download INRX app https://testflight.apple.com/join/MXpuzRZA
File, posted without a caption
https://www.ahmedabadmirror.com/inrx-release-first-financial-collateral-report-setting-a-new-standard-for-stable-coin/81883970.html
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @inrxfoundation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Crypto backed Credit Card is adoptable ?
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 January 2025 to 9 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“INRx” (@inrxfoundation), 351 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inrxfoundation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.