Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 54% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
64,400 average views per post against 86,366 subscribers — an engagement rate of 74.5%. Across the 8,378 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.08% and 21.1%, with a median of 10.5%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (24 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Posts measured
29 of 29 published in the window (0 exact, 29 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,867,000
Mature posts only
76.6% over 28 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 23 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +2,870. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 82,971–87,524 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 03:56
86,366
-72
15 Sept 2026, 03:18
86,438
+101
13 Sept 2026, 15:39
86,337
-71
11 Sept 2026, 17:57
86,408
-103
9 Sept 2026, 01:56
86,511
-135
5 Sept 2026, 16:42
86,646
+131
3 Sept 2026, 13:58
86,515
-96
2 Sept 2026, 07:13
86,611
-59
1 Sept 2026, 09:44
86,670
-121
31 Aug 2026, 10:44
86,791
-68
30 Aug 2026, 13:38
86,859
-14
29 Aug 2026, 16:16
86,873
-44
28 Aug 2026, 16:28
86,917
-82
27 Aug 2026, 14:16
86,999
+7
25 Aug 2026, 12:15
86,992
+206
24 Aug 2026, 12:27
86,786
+1,793
22 Aug 2026, 21:35
84,993
-45
21 Aug 2026, 12:07
85,038
+49
20 Aug 2026, 08:22
84,989
+318
19 Aug 2026, 05:04
84,671
first reading
Engagement
62 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 102 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
74.5%
avg views ÷ 86,366 subscribers
Avg views / post
64,400
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 62 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
62 (4 July 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
1,867,000
Reactions total
0
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 11:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
2
Links
144
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
37s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
76
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 62 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @insider_elites. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 62 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Нынешние сложности россиян — это только начало. Осенью грядёт череда событий, которые радикально изменят жизнь каждого.
90% граждан окажутся не готовы и в панике наделают глупых решений. Чтобы не оказаться среди них, читайте проверенные источники и будьте готовы заранее. Например, канал Руслана Андреева
Автор уже более 10 лет в политике и является действующим экспертом самых читаемых изданий. Ранее он уже не раз за…
Теневые бенефициары «Эксмо-АСТ»: экс-премьер РФ Степашин и помозник Путина Мединский подмяли под себя книжную империю Новикова
Пока силовики весь 2026 год кошмарят крупнейший книжный холдинг России обысками по делам об «экстремизме», за кулисами «Эксмо-АСТ» разворачивается классический номенклатурный рейдерский перехват. Источники сообщают: формальный владелец миллиардной империи Олег Новиков окончательно утратил са…
Марафон х10 от депозита? Это достижимо?
Сейчас нарастает тренд на золото, нефть и прочие активы
Трейдер Иван, который появлялся в ленте сотен каналов, которого рекомендовали десятки раз начинает новый марафон
Старт 1000$ — цель 10000$
В марафоне будет торговля по золоту,нефти и нашим любимыми крипто-активами .
ОТСЛЕДИТЬ ✅ — если ссылка работает, то доступ ещё открыт. Не пропустите!
Вырасти до уровня своего окружения — или сменить его
Есть момент, когда привычные разговоры перестают зажигать. Вокруг обсуждают то же, что и десять лет назад, а вам хочется другого — масштаба, идей, от которых внутри что-то щелкает.
NEVEREND — это не туристическая компания. Это клуб путешествий для людей, которым важно, с кем они делят горизонт.
Их экспедиции устроены так, что рядом с вами оказываются предпринима…
Часть 2. Часть 1 - здесь.
Крупный бизнес в этой картине выглядит расколотым и гораздо менее словоохотливым. Публичных заявлений о «неизбежности большой войны» от олигархов почти нет: слишком дорого. Зато есть действия и редкие срывы. Олег Дерипаска с 2022 года несколько раз называл происходящее безумием, призывал к немедленному прекращению огня без предварительных условий и критиковал военные расходы. К январю 2026 …
Часть 1.
Изнутри российской властной вертикали разговор о большой войне давно перестал быть маргинальным допущением и превратился в рабочий язык, которым пользуются и те, кто обязан удерживать официальную линию «мы ни на кого не нападаем», и те, кому поручено пугать.
17 сентября 2026 года Сергей Лавров на конгрессе русофилов прямо сказал, что правящие круги большинства стран Запада насаждают миф о российской угрозе…
🔴В 2026 году наши граждане уже заработали более 10 миллиардов рублей на Арбитраже криптовалют
По данным Минфин 23% людей уже покинули свое место работы, поскольку в среднем уже в первый месяц тут можно зарабатывать более 140 тысяч рублей, а через пару месяцев с легкостью выйти на семизначные суммы!
Самое смешное, что лишь 10% людей что-то слышали об этой профессии, хотя все обучающие материалы бесплатно лежат на ка…
Контроль над Ozon оказался устроен гораздо глубже и циничнее, чем об этом писали в недавних громких расследованиях. За номинальным фасадом и цепочками займов скрывается не просто пассивный контроль, а жесткое ручное управление операционной деятельностью маркетплейса, где ключевые олигархические группы поделили между собой целые направления бизнеса (так называемые «делянки»).
Официально крупнейшим акционером маркетпл…
80% мужчин хотят изменить — но ирония в том, что им никто не отдастся!
Другие женщины по первому взгляду считывают мужскую суету, неуверенность, желание понравится и сразу ставят на таких клеймо "тряпка"
Чтобы любая женщина воспринимала тебя, как настоящего мужика — тебе нужен мужской блог "Стержень"
Там мозгоправ с 10-летним стажем показывает, как получить харизму и уверенность, из-за которых тебя будет хотеть и …
‼️Золотое Яблоко, Рив Гош и Л’Этуаль могут идти лесом — я больше не ведусь 🤷🏽♀️
Подруга показала магазин «ПЕРВЫЙ ПАРФЮМЕРНЫЙ» там продают оригинальную парфюмерию прямо из Европы и Дубая
И цены у них ниже в 2-3 раза, чем те, которые на ценниках в магазинах
Если тоже хотите взять брендовый парфюм по их реальной цене — залетайте сюда: https://t.me/+Ke7q2hzhHa44OWVi
Как Текслер превратил Южный Урал в личный офшорный кошелек
Пока челябинские чиновники вещают с трибун о «развитии региона», за кулисами разворачивается масштабный распил, превративший Челябинскую область в ресурсную базу для узкого круга лиц. Губернатор Алексей Текслер фактически замкнул ключевые финансовые потоки на своих доверенных людей, выстроив систему вывода миллиардов рублей за пределы области.
Главный прин…
✈️ Навсегда забудьте о дорогих путешествиях за границу и по территории РФ и за границу!
Создатели канала внедрили искусственный интеллект для поиска скидок на авиабилеты, теперь никакой горящий тур не пройдет мимо!
Вот некоторые из них:
🇷🇺Перелет в Сочи и обратно за 2 500 р. за всё
🇹🇷 Турция на 2 недели в 4* отеле за 5 100₽
🇪🇬 Египет с сообственной Виллой за 22.600₽
🇹🇭Выходные в Тайланде за 9100₽
✅ Дешевые билеты …
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @insider_elites. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@insider_elites named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@bentsa_blog named in 3 posts, 2 September 2026 – 4 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“INSIDER ELITES” (@insider_elites), 86,366 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/insider_elites.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.