Channel
@inspector_cat_lab
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,010subscribers
-25 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002216303370 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @inspector_cat_lab |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/inspector_cat_lab |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 1,010 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:44 | 1,014 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 1,016 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 1,019 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 1,023 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 1,024 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:09 | 1,029 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 1,033 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:20 | 1,035 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 1,035 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 23 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11 reactions across 6 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 27.3% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 27.3% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 18.2% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пару месяцев назад залез в идею: искать на рынке неэффективности вместе с нейронками. Звучит красиво. По факту — два месяца, десятки гипотез, ноль выживших. Но знаешь, что оказалось интереснее самих денег? Понять, почему их там нет. Рынок не отдаёт просто так. Каждая дырка, которую я находил, уже была занята — кем-то быстрее, умнее или с большим депо. Нашёл сигнал — а он живёт секунды, и ты в него не успеваешь. Нашёл…
👍1
Нашел для себя новую мечту Открываю сбор на собаку Для походов по горам -- маст хев
Stonks
Наконец-то настроил кучу алертников и понял очевидную вещь: в вакууме каждый из них по отдельности не даёт никакой прибыли. Именно поэтому их и продают в приватках: ТК если б они давали деньги сами по себе, то их никто бы не продавал. А так, любой алертник -- просто красивая машинка, которая стабильно пишет, что вот ситуация, на которой теоретически кто-то мог заработать. Но не ты. А если и ты, то статистически на до…
🙏2
Кажется, я настроил мев бота на битке
Welcome to solana
Заскамился сегодня Хотя, алертник мой дал сигнал ещё на 3.47кк Но подумал, что и так дохрена уже По итогу встал в метеору бидаском на -70 по 8кк р/р соблюдаю как могу
🫡3
Ну, очевидно было, что это когда-нибудь закончится Хотя падать ещё можно, всё ещё стоит более чем дохрена
❤2
Сделал себе ещё один алертник, реагирующий на резкое увеличение вольюма Пока на тесте, но результаты уже радуют глаз (На дексскринере время UTC, на 3 часа от тайм зоны телеги. Но алерт в одно время с ростом объема)
Average is the price of excuses Trenches need to trust in something again +1.4K members in 48 hours https://x.com/mrbsol/status/2040437202321113482?s=46
Знакомый лаунчит Буду залетать сюда, потом напишу, сколько вы упустили
Гм начинается в час дня и с заработанных трёх копеек с помощью бота, которого написал с Cloud code opus Кажется, я двигаюсь к успеху На тесты, конечно, потрачено куда больше, но перспективы выйти в ноль.. Имеются А Как вы готовитесь к бычке?
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @inspector_cat_lab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Записки Инспектора” (@inspector_cat_lab), 1,010 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/inspector_cat_lab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.