Channel
@institute_of_gestalt
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,522subscribers
+39 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001761615538 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @institute_of_gestalt |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/institute_of_gestalt |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 01:20 | 1,522 | +7 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 1,515 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:17 | 1,514 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 1,515 | +10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 1,505 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 1,504 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 1,502 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 1,503 | +5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 02:58 | 1,498 | +6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:50 | 1,492 | +9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 1,483 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 1,483 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
77 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 44 | 57.1% | |
| 🔥 | 26 | 33.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 6.49% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.30% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 77 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Думаете пойти учиться на гештальт-терапевта? Или уже практикуете и размышляете, куда дальше в профессии? Зовём вас познакомиться и обсудить всё это на Днях открытых дверей – они пройдут онлайн (и бесплатно, конечно же). Вы уйдёте со встречи с дорожной картой – вам станет яснее, как двигаться вперёд. 🌀Для начинающих – 18 августа 17:00-19:00 СЕТ Приходите, если вы давно интересуетесь психологией и хотите получить но…
❤3🔥3
Что такое движение, если не изменение положения вещей во времени? Что такое изменение, если не жизнь, которая не может оставаться прежней? И что такое мышление, если не попытка удержать это движение, не останавливая его? В МИГе есть курс «Основы философии для гештальт-терапевтов». Этл довольно редкое, почти уникальное явление для гештальт-образования. Это не философия в формате «запомним трёх греков и пойдём дальш…
❤5
МИГ | Международный Институт Гештальта pinned a photo
События августа🔥🔥🔥 У нас будет так много всего, что все анонсы не поместились на картинки👀👀 Поэтому продолжаем текстом: 🌀 MIG.TALKS — бесплатно Мастер-класс про стыд 17 августа, 12:00-14:00 CET Алина Зырянова и Юлия Здоренко Исследуем, как стыд возникает в контакте: где замирает тело, что хочется спрятать и как появляется желание исчезнуть. Попробуем не «побеждать» стыд, а остаться с ним чуть дольше — в пространс…
🔥7❤1
Работать с семьёй значит видеть не только отдельных людей, но и всю систему – живую и развивающуюся✨ Почему партнёры снова и снова оказываются в одном и том же конфликте? Как история нескольких поколений продолжает влиять на отношения сегодня? И что делать терапевту, когда в кабинете оказываются сразу несколько человек со своими чувствами, ожиданиями и представлениями о том, «как должно быть»? 📚 21–22 октября в МИГ…
❤7
Voice message, posted without a caption
❤7🔥4💯1
🌀 Сегодня голосовое сообщение про смысл (и смыслы) идти учиться на третью ступень — от Евгения Колесникова, гештальт-терапевта, супервизора и директора МИГа. А также — одного из ведущих нашей третьей ступени. Она стартует в апреле 2027 года, но планировать стоит уже сейчас. 🌀 Все подробности про неё — на сайте.
🔥7
Терапевт не может разбираться сразу во всём – рано или поздно в практике появляется клиент со сложным опытом, про который вы знаете мало. Как раз для таких ситуаций мы запускаем годовую программу повышения квалификации для гештальт-терапевтов. Это своего рода мульти-специализация: за время обучения вы познакомитесь с подходами к работе со сложными клиентскими запросами. Каждый семинар посвящен отдельной теме и пост…
❤10🔥5
Хотим вам рассказать, что мы запустили email-рассылку💡 Мы сами очень не любим спам и рассылки, единственная задача которых – что-то продать. Поэтому нашу мы делаем полезной! Она устроена как сериал – сейчас сезон сексуальности, через какое-то время будет другая тема. Уже отправили три письма — на скрине одно из них🔥 Присоединяйтесь, будем рады отправлять письмо и вам❤️❤️❤️ Оставляйте ваш email в форме на любой ст…
❤6👍1
Video, posted without a caption
❤🔥5
⚡️ Сообщение для тех, кто любит прыгать в последний вагон: уже в этот понедельник, 20 июля, мы проводим клинический разбор клиентского случая психогенной депрессии невротического уровня. Вы увидите, как именно психиатр и гештальт-терапевт совмещают клиническую и гештальт-перспективы в работе с таким клиентом: ⬆️сначала будет представление случая психогенной депрессии невротического уровня ⬆️потом – клиническое инте…
❤5
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @institute_of_gestalt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МИГ | Международный Институт Гештальта” (@institute_of_gestalt), 1,522 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/institute_of_gestalt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.