Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Интернет-культура

Channel

Интернет-культура

@internetculture

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10,020subscribers

-93 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001357161176
TypeChannel
Username@internetculture
Created12 October 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/internetculture

Growth

10,02010,11310,066.56 August 2026 — 10,113 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,113 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,107 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,104 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,102 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,098 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,094 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,093 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,089 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,084 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,080 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,074 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,070 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,069 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,064 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,061 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,056 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,055 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,049 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,048 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,042 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,038 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,035 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,032 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,031 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,026 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,023 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,020 subscribers6 August 20263 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 28 days, net -93. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,006–10,127 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 00:1910,020-3
1 Sept 2026, 20:5510,023-3
31 Aug 2026, 20:3510,026-5
30 Aug 2026, 16:5710,031-1
29 Aug 2026, 16:4710,032-3
28 Aug 2026, 17:4210,035-3
27 Aug 2026, 21:0410,038-4
26 Aug 2026, 19:0410,042-6
25 Aug 2026, 21:4610,048-1
24 Aug 2026, 22:3210,049-6
23 Aug 2026, 07:1610,055-1
21 Aug 2026, 20:1710,056-5
20 Aug 2026, 13:2210,061-3
19 Aug 2026, 16:4710,064-5
18 Aug 2026, 17:4810,069-1
17 Aug 2026, 20:0810,070-4
16 Aug 2026, 18:1210,074-6
15 Aug 2026, 02:4810,080-4
13 Aug 2026, 16:3810,084-5
12 Aug 2026, 14:4710,089first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 7 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 48s
Average length
58s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,230 reactions across 12 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁38030.9%
29323.8%
😭12410.1%
💯1149.27%
🔥705.69%
🫡675.45%
😐524.23%
🌚332.68%
👀332.68%
👍231.87%
🤯110.894%
🦄90.732%
💅80.65%
😡80.65%
😈30.244%
🌭20.163%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,230 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 7 October 2025 to 28 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Dec 2025, 17:22 UTC≈4,360 views119 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Это многое говорит об обществе

😁8712🔥12👍5🌭2💯1

Signed Konstantin

18 Dec 2025, 20:45 UTC≈4,790 views48 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Если вам было мало платных ссылок в Reels (их там хотя бы не было и до этого), то держите еще сверху платные ссылки в Фейсбуке. Пишут, что креаторам без купленной верификации, которые попали в этот тест, больше не доступна публикация внешних ссылок во всех органических постах. Если вы хотели возразить, что ссылки и так все оставляют в первом комментарии, чтобы не вредить охватам и всё такое, то Фейсбук и это предус

🌚19😐147👍4😁2💯1🔥1

Signed Konstantin

2 Dec 2025, 12:35 UTC≈4,440 views38 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @creatoreconomyPhoto

🖱Занятие на ночь: листаем презу Social Signals от стратега Мэтью Стасофф о соцсетях, онлайн-культуре и поведении пользователей; вспоминаем уходящий год, ностальгируем, думаем. Версию-2024 можно посмотреть тут.

22🔥10👍3👀2💯1

Signed Konstantin

25 Nov 2025, 14:35 UTC≈4,110 views47 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Две новости о Фейсбуке: • в Фейсбуке продолжает никто не сидеть. • Фейсбук, который всю жизнь топил за реальные имена и банил за псевдонимы, вводит никнеймы в группах. Думайте.

😁316👀6🔥3💯1

Signed Konstantin

23 Nov 2025, 18:58 UTC≈4,320 views140 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Твиттер добавил долгожданную фичу, которая отображает страну, в которой находится владелец аккаунта. Скрыть эти данные из своего профиля нельзя — вы можете выбрать либо страну, либо регион (Европа, Африка, Северная Америка и т.д.) Поначалу апдейт выкатили на пару часов и затем убрали, спровоцировав море спекуляций, но вчера вечером функция заработала у всех. И началось настоящее онлайн-линчевание с первыми жертвами

😁8924💯13😡6🔥4😐4

Signed Konstantin

17 Nov 2025, 23:22 UTC≈3,440 views63 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Интересно, получится ли у Нолана исторически достоверный циклоп.

😁494🌚3🔥3💅2👍1🦄1

Signed Konstantin

14 Nov 2025, 04:09 UTC≈5,780 views136 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Ладно, уговорили. Пузырь в $400 миллиардов того стоит.

😁105🔥12😐8💯3😈3🌚2👀2👍1

Signed Konstantin

31 Oct 2025, 04:03 UTC≈5,770 views89 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Gen Z продолжают эксплуатировать миллениальскую ностальгию по нормальной жизни вне алгоритмов, фильтров и нейрошизы. Создатели нового приложения Dijie радикальным образом ответили на растущий у молодежи запрос на "соцсеть без ИИ-слопа": чтобы выкладывать там фотки, вам придется купить их камеру за $400. Камера синхронизируется с приложением на айфоне и выкладывает снимки с датой, числом просмотров и ссылкой на проф

48👀20😁12🦄4👍3💅1😐1

Signed Konstantin

30 Oct 2025, 02:39 UTC≈4,140 views108 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Прощай, Emojipedia.

🫡67😭24🤯11😐3👍2🔥1

Signed Konstantin

21 Oct 2025, 00:02 UTC≈4,770 views99 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Лучшие умы пытаются выяснить откуда же взялся кризис фертильности, отсутствие секса у молодых людей и усугубляющийся разрыв в социально-политических взглядах двух полов. 6🤷‍♂️7, пацаны.

😭65😐195💅5😁4🔥1

Signed Konstantin

15 Oct 2025, 01:48 UTC≈5,370 views65 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Интересно в Твиттере наблюдать, как Дуров потихоньку включает режим Маска и пока в очень осторожной форме, как он всегда это делает, намекает западному сообществу, что их крайне правые политики — это добро. Маск, за свою недолгую политическую карьеру, успел громко поддержать обе упомянутые Дуровым партии. Что было дальше — вы знаете. Поссорился с Трампом, выперли из DOGE, после чего благополучно вернулся к роботам,

😭3513🌚9🦄3😡2👍1🔥1😁1

Signed Konstantin

7 Oct 2025, 15:29 UTC≈8,140 views278 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Дочь актера Робина Уилльямса написала в сторис эмоциональную реакцию на AI-слоп, прекрасно описав ~98% того, что я вижу, особенно за последнюю неделю. Пожалуйста, перестаньте присылать мне AI-видео с папой. Не надо думать, что я хочу это видеть или что «пойму» — нет, не хочу и не пойму. Если вы просто троллите — видела и похуже, я вас заблокирую и пойду дальше. Но если у вас вообще есть хоть капля приличия — прост

152💯94🔥22👀3👍3😐3🦄1

Signed Konstantin

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @internetculture. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Интернет-культура” (@internetculture), 10,020 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/internetculture.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.