Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for MakSec – защита от мошенников 🔒

Channel

MakSec – защита от мошенников 🔒

@intruder_protection

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,487subscribers

-571 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003609901914
TypeChannel
Username@intruder_protection
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/intruder_protection

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,4872,0581,772.59 August 2026 — 2,058 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,058 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,045 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,763 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,672 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,664 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,649 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,633 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,562 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,550 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,525 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,487 subscribers9 August 202615 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 37 days, net -571. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,401–2,144 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 04:211,487-38
11 Sept 2026, 22:011,525-25
7 Sept 2026, 13:211,550-12
2 Sept 2026, 06:141,562-71
29 Aug 2026, 21:041,633-16
26 Aug 2026, 12:331,649-15
23 Aug 2026, 11:271,664-8
19 Aug 2026, 17:031,672-91
16 Aug 2026, 18:191,763-282
12 Aug 2026, 20:232,045-13
9 Aug 2026, 13:002,058no change
9 Aug 2026, 12:482,058first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

766 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍22829.8%
❤18424.0%
🔥16221.1%
😎668.62%
🤔455.87%
💔415.35%
😁405.22%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 766 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @intruder_protection. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC66 views32 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

📱 Реальные NFC-атаки в России За последние два года в России зафиксированы крупные мошеннические схемы, связанные с NFC. Во всех случаях сначала заражали телефон пользователя. 🔹 NFCGate (2024–2025) Мошенники предлагали установить якобы банковское приложение или «обновление безопасности». За два месяца было зафиксировано 400 атак с общим ущербом около 40 млн рублей. 🔹 «Защитное приложение банка» (2025) Вредоносное…

❤14👍12🔥6

3 Aug 2026, 06:53 UTC85 views32 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

📡 Телефон в заднем кармане. Могут ли мошенники украсть деньги, даже если вы его не доставали? Да, но это не так просто. NFC — технология бесконтактной передачи данных на расстоянии. Именно благодаря ей мы оплачиваем покупки телефоном. Самый "известный" миф 🔹 людное место; 🔹 мошенник незаметно приближает терминал к смартфону с NFC или карте; 🔹 переводит небольшую сумму без PIN-кода, пока человек отвлечен. Реальнос…

🔥10❤9👍9🤔4

27 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC119 views37 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://vkvideo.ru/video-237177950_456239026

❤13😎11🔥6💔4😁3

27 Jul 2026, 05:02 UTC122 views42 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🦸Наверняка к этому моменту у многих возник вопрос: кто же этот человек, сумевший переиграть мошенников? Пора раскрыть интригу. Нашего героя зовут Павел. Сейчас он на пути к получению свидетельства пилота коммерческой авиации уже в четвёртой стране – Павел искренне влюблён в небо и самолёты. Но это далеко не единственная его сильная сторона. Помимо авиации, Павел давно состоялся как хороший айтишник, обладает глубок…

❤12🔥12👍11😁5💔2

26 Jul 2026, 08:46 UTC108 views37 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🎭 Когда мошенники сами стали жертвами пранка Обычно такие истории заканчиваются потерей денег. Но в этот раз всё пошло совсем по другому. Все начиналось как на схеме в предыдущем посте. Всё выглядело максимально правдоподобно: разговор на иврите, профессиональная терминология, «диагностика», IP-адреса, маршрутизаторы, удалённая поддержка. Дальше — классическая схема: организация удаленного доступа. Но мошенники не…

💔10👍9🔥9😎6❤1🤔1😁1

24 Jul 2026, 05:39 UTC110 views36 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍13❤11🔥9💔2🤔1

24 Jul 2026, 05:35 UTC135 views31 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🇮🇱 Как мошенники в Израиле выдают себя за интернет-провайдеров и получают доступ к банковским счетам Этап 1. Звонок «от провайдера» Мошенники звонят от имени Bezeq, HOT Telecom, Partner/012 Smile, Cellcom и сообщают о проблемах с интернетом. Затем предлагают связаться с «техническим специалистом», полностью копируя работу настоящей службы поддержки. Этап 2. Установка программы удалённого доступа Звонит «инженер» и…

👍16❤11🤔4

22 Jul 2026, 04:32 UTC167 views42 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

❤14👍13🔥11😁2💔1🤔1

21 Jul 2026, 03:23 UTC185 views45 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤔 Какие самые массовые мошеннические схемы? 🥇 «Безопасный счёт» Это №1 по распространённости. Почему: • простая легенда (защита денег), • высокая срочность («сейчас украдут»), • хорошо работает на страхе. Используется в большинстве звонков от «службы безопасности банка». 🥈 «Взлом / утечка / кредит на вас» Вторая по частоте группа. Почему: • почти у всех есть страх кибермошенничества, • легко имитировать «техническу…

🤔16❤13🔥10👍5💔1

20 Jul 2026, 16:36 UTC352 views48 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Сегодня Telegram написал мне, что у нас с Вами популярный канал — @intruder_protection! И для дальнейшего развития канала посоветовал предложить, Вам, уважаемые подписчики проголосовать за канал по ссылке: https://t.me/intruder_protection?boost Чем больше у канала голосов, тем выше его уровень. Если Вам нравится канал, то прошу Вас проголосовать! +💯 в карму)

👍22❤12🔥6😎4💔2🤔1😁1

20 Jul 2026, 06:48 UTC412 views53 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🪖 Уже более 2 млн граждан завербованы в мошеннические схемы. 🎯 Мошенники вовлекают не напрямую, используют различные схемы вербовки. Когда понимаешь, что ты занимаешься незаконной деятельностью - становится слишком поздно. Будьте внимательны: 1⃣ Фиктивное трудоустройство Самая распространённая схема для «неосознанных» участников. На сайтах вакансий публикуются объявления о работе. Соискателю предлагают оформить ба…

👍22❤12😎9💔3🤔3🔥2😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @intruder_protection. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“MakSec – защита от мошенников 🔒” (@intruder_protection), 1,487 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/intruder_protection.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.