Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for scriptura gignit imaginem

Channel

scriptura gignit imaginem

@intvdual

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,062subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001863514329
TypeChannel
Username@intvdual
Created20 October 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/intvdual

Growth

1,0571,0631,0607 August 2026 — 1,058 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,058 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,059 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,058 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,057 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,060 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,063 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,062 subscribers1,0627 August 202627 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,056–1,064 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 08:521,062-1
24 Aug 2026, 07:221,063+3
20 Aug 2026, 09:051,060+3
17 Aug 2026, 13:271,057-1
14 Aug 2026, 00:141,058-1
11 Aug 2026, 05:121,059+1
8 Aug 2026, 00:181,058no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:531,058first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 25 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
59s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

381 reactions across 17 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9625.2%
🔥8121.3%
❤‍🔥6316.5%
236.04%
👍215.51%
😁215.51%
174.46%
🤔102.62%
custom 544977283955088109882.10%
👏61.57%
💋61.57%
👀51.31%
🌚30.787%
👌30.787%
💅30.787%
🤡30.787%
🤣30.787%
🎉20.525%
😎20.525%
👨‍💻10.262%
4 further kinds41.05%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 381 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC289 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

А какой у вас любимый рассказ Гегеля?

😁4💋3🤡2👍1💩1

29 Jul 2026, 15:58 UTC598 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В хорошей компании

52🤔2👍1🔥1😍1

19 Jul 2026, 17:22 UTC725 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

А чтобы как-то себя развлекать, навëл с переводчиком перформативный движ-остранение. Концепт в переложении моей графомании на другой язык, примитивно выпрямляя завитушки, чтобы посмотреть на содержимое как оно есть. В общем, балуюсь пока этим, потому что прочие ролевые игры износились. Ещё конечно от носителей языка интересно получить фидбэк. А вы какой дурью маетесь?

🔥5💋3

19 Jul 2026, 17:12 UTC612 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Работаем

🤔5😁5👨‍💻1💅1😭1custom 54497728395508810981

18 Jul 2026, 18:18 UTC563 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Новый, написанный от руки, роман Майерхофера, который основан на образе, навеянном романом Car Харри Крюза, о мужчине, запершемся на складе, чтобы вести оттуда трансляцию «himself eating a Cybertruck from bumper-to-bumper«, приняли в FC2. Порадуемся.

98🔥4🎉2

17 Jul 2026, 16:44 UTC631 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Новый свой роман Грант Майерхофер пишет от руки. Говорит, крутой опыт. Будучи амбассадором письма как процесса, я рад, что до него дошло) Кроме того, I knew that I wanted to write a book I’ve long dreamt of writing, about an artist enacting a performance that was deeply immersive. Ever since I heard the premise of Harry Crews’ novel Car, and probably even before that when I’d seen Ripley’s Believe it or Not and hea

❤‍🔥14👍6🔥3

15 Jul 2026, 15:56 UTC658 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Оксения Тишина, асемия

105

13 Jul 2026, 16:38 UTC765 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Работаем работаем

19😁12🔥4🤔1

9 Jul 2026, 15:45 UTC852 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Связка переводчик-редактор это как бас и барабаны. Если они друг друга слышат, то и вся группа грувит. Легенды стиля, и работать с ними — эйфория.

23🔥6👏2

4 Jul 2026, 08:41 UTC≈1,050 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Олег Стрижак: ...когда я впервые взял в руки один из томов Талмуда, ин фолио, и раскрыл, я ахнул, в восхищении: именно о такой вёрстке для моих рукописей я мечтал всю жизнь, талмудическая вёрстка: единственный в полиграфии способ снять все недостатки линейного письма, в середине листа, уступами, размещён основной текст, не однородный, двойственный, и здесь же приведены его варианты, и вокруг, в изяществе необычайно

8🔥83👍3💅1🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @intvdual. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Работа в Минске
@pratsa_vakansii · 56,972
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“scriptura gignit imaginem” (@intvdual), 1,062 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/intvdual.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.