Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Инвестиции с Никитой Костанда

Channel

Инвестиции с Никитой Костанда

@investacademy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

33,583subscribers

-151 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001131467589
TypeChannel
Username@investacademy
DescriptionПомогаю создать и управлять благосостоянием. https://ftg.limited/ Никита Костанда - автор канала: @inwestsovetnik Присоединяйся к каналу в максе по ссылке: https://max.ru/investacademy РКН:https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/6810e189cf518f125a69b0ea
Created9 June 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/investacademy

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

33,47933,73433,606.55 August 2026 — 33,734 subscribers6 August 2026 — 33,734 subscribers6 August 2026 — 33,730 subscribers7 August 2026 — 33,733 subscribers8 August 2026 — 33,725 subscribers9 August 2026 — 33,712 subscribers10 August 2026 — 33,710 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33,707 subscribers12 August 2026 — 33,693 subscribers14 August 2026 — 33,688 subscribers15 August 2026 — 33,683 subscribers17 August 2026 — 33,679 subscribers18 August 2026 — 33,676 subscribers19 August 2026 — 33,668 subscribers20 August 2026 — 33,657 subscribers21 August 2026 — 33,649 subscribers22 August 2026 — 33,636 subscribers24 August 2026 — 33,623 subscribers25 August 2026 — 33,611 subscribers26 August 2026 — 33,609 subscribers27 August 2026 — 33,588 subscribers28 August 2026 — 33,581 subscribers29 August 2026 — 33,575 subscribers30 August 2026 — 33,568 subscribers31 August 2026 — 33,552 subscribers1 September 2026 — 33,537 subscribers2 September 2026 — 33,538 subscribers3 September 2026 — 33,530 subscribers6 September 2026 — 33,523 subscribers9 September 2026 — 33,498 subscribers11 September 2026 — 33,479 subscribers13 September 2026 — 33,500 subscribers15 September 2026 — 33,598 subscribers17 September 2026 — 33,609 subscribers26 September 2026 — 33,583 subscribers33,5835 August 202626 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 51 days, net -151. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,441–33,772 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 03:1733,583-26
17 Sept 2026, 08:2233,609+11
15 Sept 2026, 08:5733,598+98
13 Sept 2026, 17:1933,500+21
11 Sept 2026, 20:0133,479-19
9 Sept 2026, 11:5933,498-25
6 Sept 2026, 01:4133,523-7
3 Sept 2026, 23:0233,530-8
2 Sept 2026, 14:3733,538+1
1 Sept 2026, 12:4333,537-15
31 Aug 2026, 10:2833,552-16
30 Aug 2026, 07:0433,568-7
29 Aug 2026, 04:1633,575-6
28 Aug 2026, 04:3733,581-7
27 Aug 2026, 06:4633,588-21
26 Aug 2026, 05:0733,609-2
25 Aug 2026, 08:2233,611-12
24 Aug 2026, 09:5433,623-13
22 Aug 2026, 19:4233,636-13
21 Aug 2026, 10:2733,649first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 84 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.56%
avg views ÷ 33,583 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,200
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held35 (7 July 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total44,050
Reactions total739
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 06:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈478
Videos
≈23
Links
≈1,220

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,558 reactions across 35 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍69744.7%
❤36023.1%
🔥30319.4%
💯1328.47%
🤔573.66%
🍾90.578%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,558 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
65
across the posts below
Posts paid on
16
of 35 we hold a reading for · 46%
Most on one post
36
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @investacademy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 35 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 12:52 UTC≈1,030 views38 reactionsread 26 September 2026

Сегодня ещё и прекрасный повод напомнить, почему я всё время писал: если хотите инвестировать в золото, покупайте золото, а не золотодобывающие компании. Просто потому, что в любой момент может случиться вот это: Законопроектом предусмотрена донастройка налогообложения природной ренты. В секторе горно-металлургического комплекса предлагается ввести налог для отдельных добывающих организаций в размере 30% от дополните…

👍29❤7🔥2

24 Sept 2026, 11:34 UTC≈1,130 views37 reactions2 Starsread 26 September 2026

Ну, здравствуйте. Приехал новый пакет, но уже от Минфина, он же новый бюджет. Когда в предыдущем выпуске на Sponsr я разбирал новость о том, что бюджет будут верстать исходя из цены на нефть в 50 долларов за баррель, я написал, что это ставит доходную часть в зависимость от ненефтегазовых доходов. И предположил, что правительство будет заинтересовано в развитии этого направления. Реальность оказалась менее радужной:…

👍25🔥8❤4

23 Sept 2026, 11:07 UTC≈1,230 views31 reactions1 Starread 26 September 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥17❤9👍5

22 Sept 2026, 09:55 UTC≈1,330 views66 reactions2 Starsread 26 September 2026

“Как балансируете между работой и остальными занятиями? Мне уже больше хочется уделять времени своим хобби, но тогда начинаешь упускать какие-то моменты по работе. Вот и пытаюсь гоняться за всеми зайцами, но выходит так себе)) И по нервной системе работа бьёт сильно. Как решить, что хватит, и уйти в более спокойный для себя режим, пусть и с потерей части доходов?” Баланса не существует. Есть выбор, который вы делает…

🔥36👍15❤14💯1

21 Sept 2026, 12:12 UTC≈1,650 views28 reactionsread 26 September 2026

Так случилось, что сегодня будет не один, а целых ДВА выпуска. Первый посвящён наследованию. Тема мне давно близка, и недавно всё совпало. В Bloomberg вышла статья о том, как индийские семьи-миллиардеры не могут передать бизнес следующему поколению, а через пару дней читательница канала прислала мне историю семейного спора вокруг наследства. Из этого вырос текст почти на час чтения. Наследование обычно обсуждают пр…

🔥14❤7💯3🍾2🤔2

17 Sept 2026, 07:39 UTC≈2,460 views61 reactions1 Starread 26 September 2026

Тревожит деградация российского фондового рынка. Отсутствие отчётности, плохие корпоративные практики, кидки миноров, и при этом отсутствие реакции регулятора, всё время новые вводные от государства по каким-то налогам или отчислениям, делистинг. Такое складывается впечатление, что инвестировать в российский рынок не стоит вообще. Один Сбер держится пока. В контексте вчерашнего поста, думаю, будет актуальным разобрат…

👍37🔥14❤6💯4

16 Sept 2026, 11:49 UTC≈2,420 views32 reactionsread 26 September 2026

Польская компания Orlen потеряла 400 миллионов долларов, которые внесла в качестве предоплаты за нефть из Венесуэлы. Об этом сообщает Financial Times (FT). Концерн перевел предоплату за сырье, которое так и не было поставлено, двум посредникам в Дубае. Деньги за несуществующую нефть прошли через швейцарскую «дочку» Orlen Trading Switzerland. Hannon International Middle East DMCC и Horizon Global обязались поставить н…

👍23❤3🔥3🤔3

16 Sept 2026, 11:05 UTC≈2,190 views44 reactions2 Starsread 26 September 2026

Posted without readable text

👍26❤14🔥3🤔1

15 Sept 2026, 09:56 UTC≈1,790 views48 reactions36 Starsread 26 September 2026

Добрый вечер. Вы просили задать вопросы. Вопрос следующий: Я, как вы советуете диверсифицировал свои риски и получил второй гражданство. Конечно такое решение было принято исходя из событий всем нам известным в России. Я живу в Израиле и задумываюсь об инвестициях в разные юрисдикции. При этом понимаю, что в каждой стране есть свои налоговые законы, по которым люди живут и инвестируют в конкретной стране. Как мне пла…

👍32🔥9❤7

14 Sept 2026, 13:12 UTC≈1,820 views25 reactions2 Starsread 26 September 2026

На прошлой неделе ЦБ РФ оставил процентную ставку без изменений. А в новостном поле сразу появились материалы со страшилками. Что на самом деле стоит за решением ЦБ РФ и насколько сильно оно меняет мою позицию по российским акциям? Но самое интересное сейчас происходит на мировой арене. Стратегические резервы в нефти «сжигаются» рекордными темпами, но это у «условного Запада». Китай же резко изменил свою стратегию, …

🔥17👍8

14 Sept 2026, 08:25 UTC≈1,840 views29 reactions3 Starsread 26 September 2026
Photo

Пока западные страны сжигают резервы, пытаясь погасить пламя на Ближнем Востоке. Китайцы решили этого не делать и с августа месяца пылесосят рынок нефти, скупая все доступные объемы. Да так, что на текущий момент фьючерсы на нефть на шанхайской бирже торгуются на 20-25 долларов дороже Brent. (900 юаней за баррель при курсе 6,7 = 134 доллара) Сегодня в новом материале на спонср будем обсуждать этот феномен! Но у меня…

👍23❤3🤔2🔥1

11 Sept 2026, 08:32 UTC≈2,680 views71 reactions1 Starread 26 September 2026

Поделись фишками, которые помогают восстановиться морально. А то сейчас и малышка растёт (ей +300% времени), и проект на стадии, где нужно активное моё внимание, и семье хотя бы кусочек внимания и времени. Устал, конечно. Нужны батарейки для зарядки сил. Поделись своими “Лучше ужасный конец, чем ужас без конца” - Фердинанд Шилль. Вы указали три области жизни, причем малышку и семью разнесли в раздельные позиции:) В…

🔥38👍18❤10💯5

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @investacademy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Инвестиции с Никитой Костанда” (@investacademy), 33,583 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/investacademy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.