Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,292–1,317 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 12:41
1,297
+2
10 Sept 2026, 20:17
1,295
-3
5 Sept 2026, 11:21
1,298
-1
1 Sept 2026, 20:35
1,299
+1
29 Aug 2026, 22:55
1,298
-3
26 Aug 2026, 22:26
1,301
-3
23 Aug 2026, 18:08
1,304
-2
20 Aug 2026, 12:16
1,306
-2
17 Aug 2026, 14:28
1,308
-1
14 Aug 2026, 06:14
1,309
-2
11 Aug 2026, 00:16
1,311
-1
7 Aug 2026, 18:33
1,312
-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:47
1,314
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
308 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
130
42.2%
🙏
35
11.4%
🤝
31
10.1%
🎉
27
8.77%
👍
23
7.47%
🔥
21
6.82%
🙈
14
4.55%
💯
7
2.27%
🍾
3
0.974%
👨💻
3
0.974%
😡
3
0.974%
🥰
3
0.974%
custom 5210744041079063997
2
0.649%
🤔
2
0.649%
❤🔥
1
0.325%
🐳
1
0.325%
👀
1
0.325%
🤓
1
0.325%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 308 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что пока известно по Евротрансу ⛽️
Купоны по 1 и 2 выпуску зеленых облигаций отправлены в депозитарии брокеров. В понедельник-вторник они поступят на брокерские счета.
По 9 выпуску постепенно отправляют деньги: сегодня перечислили еще 0,24 копейки на каждую облигацию.
Новые данные по инфляции 🇷🇺
Росстат зафиксировал дефляцию на 0,02% за период с 28 июля по 3 августа впервые с середины мая.
Годовая инфляция по данным Минэкономразвития составила 6,11%
💬Денис Ивлев | Про инвестиции
📲Канал в max
Сегодня мне 28 лет 🎉
Чем старше становлюсь, тем сильнее понимаю, что настоящее счастье редко связано с какими-то громкими событиями.
Оно в том, чтобы просыпаться с удовольствием, заниматься любимым делом, проводить время с близкими, строить планы и просто чувствовать, что ты на своем месте.
Именно так я могу описать этот год.
Я доволен тем, как складывается моя жизнь. Не потому что всё идеально - трудности были и…
Российские «неквалифицированные» инвесторы вывели из фондов облигаций почти 90 млрд в июле 2026 года
Это стало наибольшим оттоком из инструмента в номинальном выражении за всю историю наблюдений с 1998 года.
Что думаете по этому поводу?
На мой взгляд, люди сейчас сильно напуганы неопределенностью. Поэтому увеличиваются притоки в фонды денежного рынка.
💬Денис Ивлев | Про инвестиции
📲Канал в max
Новое приложение Т-банка для IOS 🏦
➡ приложение называется Air Pilot Log: https://l.cu.ru/tbank_appstore
Старая версия может скоро перестать работать.
💬Денис Ивлев | Про инвестиции
📲Канал в max
Евротранс начинает использовать кредитную линию Газпромбанка ⛽️
31 июля 2026 года обозначена дата проведения заседания совета директоров компании.
На этом заседании будут обсуждать оформление кредита от Газпромбанка (ранее одобренную кредитную линию около 8 млрд рублей).
Поэтому просроченные купоны, вероятно, тоже заплатят 31 июля 💼
💬Денис Ивлев | Про инвестиции
📲Канал в max
❤5🤝5🙏5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @investivlev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Про инвестиции от финконсультантов pro.finansy @profinansy_ru · 41,499 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
Мужской взгляд на деньги | pro.finansy @investnews_profinansy · 21,730 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 September 2026
Марафон по финансовой грамотности | pro.finansy @igra_profinansy · 46,359 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Олюшка и крипта l pro.finansy @investiruy_ru · 46,060 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 27 August 2026
Закон и финансы | pro.finansy @zf_profinansy · 22,413 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 September 2026
Осенняя школа | 23-25 сентября @invest_profinansy · 33,017 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Куда инвестирует Ольга Гогаладзе | pro.finansy @alwaysbemoney · 31,333 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
Дивиденды | pro.finansy @div_profinansy · 75,055 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
Ответы от Оли Гогаладзе @pravda_pro_finansy · 36,578 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 September 2026
Облигации | pro.finansy @obligaciipr · 57,405 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
Агрегатор инвест идей | pro.finansy @investforbegginers · 58,182 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
pro.news | новости про деньги @profinansy_news · 86,141 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
52 недели богатства | pro.finansy @weeks52wealth · 32,407 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
pro.finansy | дети @pro_finansy_kids · 63,377 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Денис Ивлев | Про Инвестиции” (@investivlev), 1,297 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/investivlev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.