Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Записки Иуданна

Channel

Записки Иуданна

@ioannblog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,051subscribers

+149 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001535763606
TypeChannel
Username@ioannblog
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ioannblog

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,8942,0511,972.57 August 2026 — 1,902 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,902 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,901 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,902 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,901 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,894 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,895 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,917 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,919 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,929 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,964 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,986 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,026 subscribers14 September 2026 — 2,050 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,051 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net +149. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,870–2,075 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 17:192,051+1
14 Sept 2026, 08:412,050+24
10 Sept 2026, 18:142,026+40
5 Sept 2026, 17:381,986+22
1 Sept 2026, 10:241,964+35
29 Aug 2026, 06:231,929+10
26 Aug 2026, 09:191,919+2
23 Aug 2026, 09:581,917+22
19 Aug 2026, 12:231,895+1
16 Aug 2026, 20:481,894-7
13 Aug 2026, 02:171,901-1
10 Aug 2026, 04:021,902+1
7 Aug 2026, 14:451,901-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:001,902no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:481,902first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 09s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,137 reactions across 21 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁36932.5%
🤣26723.5%
👍15914.0%
13011.4%
💔534.66%
🤔282.46%
💯242.11%
🥰191.67%
🔥171.50%
😢171.50%
🤮151.32%
😱100.88%
🤩90.792%
🤡60.528%
👏40.352%
👀20.176%
💩20.176%
🤨20.176%
👎10.088%
💘10.088%
2 further kinds20.176%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,137 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC248 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Для меня медди великий игрок уровня бигов тбш есть остальное пох но то как лн играет в этом сезоне .....

🤣26😁15

6 Aug 2026, 00:27 UTC605 views65 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как же я ненавижу теннис. Точнее, то, что нынче называется теннисом. Почему я посмотрел матч, где человек, который защищает очки за прошлогодний финал на Мастерсе, играет сет с качеством удара с бэкхенда 4,6? Почему половиной мячей за игру он не попадает центром ракетки? То, чем занимается Хачанов, то, что вытворяет Медведев, перформанс Франа Серундоло против Микельсона — это реально надругательство над теннисом.

😁39💯108💔7🤝1

5 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC657 views99 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Александр Зверев может побить рекорд Новака Джоковича по количеству выигранных титулов Большого шлема. Для этого немцу нужно выигрывать календарный Большой шлем следующие 6 лет. Когда, если не сейчас? 💨 @ioannblog

🤣66😁33

3 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC811 views81 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Шамиль Анвярович, как всегда — на стиле. @ioannblog

🤣50😁17👍7🤡61

31 Jul 2026, 07:01 UTC≈1,090 views55 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Можно и дальше думать, что Карен Хачанов — честный и примерный спортсмен, а можно заиметь критическое мышление и прийти к тому, что он на полшишки продолжает дело Карацева и Басилашвили. @ioannblog

🤣34🤔14👍7

29 Jul 2026, 12:11 UTC941 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Зверев-то у нас уникальный персонаж. Единственный в своем роде, кто выиграл ТБШ, олимпийское золото в одиночке, итоговый турнир и не был первым в мире. Правда, график делал какой-то говноед, ведь Кафель выигрывал ТБШ и был первым в мире, Питт выигрывал Итоговый турнир, а Агасси должен быть в одном списке с Ноле и сэром. @ioannblog

👍17🔥42

28 Jul 2026, 18:00 UTC≈1,350 views75 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Якуб Меншик в прошлом году выиграл Мастерс в Майами, обыграв по пути Агута, Дрэйпера, Сафиуллина, Махача, Фиса, Фритца и Джоковича в финале. Знаете, сколько он заработал? 1 124 380 долларов США до вычета налогов. Знаете, сколько заработает Алекс де Минор за то, что приедет после свадьбы в Саудовскую Аравию, снимется в нескольких роликах и раздвинет булки перед Синнером через фору −9,5? 1 500 000 долларов США. Тенн

😁47😢17🔥64🤣1

28 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC862 views56 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Объявили состав на Турнир шести королей у саудитов. Сказать, что я в ахуе, — не сказать ничего. Список участников состоит из Синнера, Алькараса, Зверева, Джоковича, Фритца (так себе кандидатура, но ок) и АЛЕКСА ДЕ МИНОРА. Ранее весь мир смеялся с приезда Циципаса, но какое отношение имеет австралиец к термину «король» или «чемпион»? У меня не укладывается в голове, как можно пригласить человека с нулём полуфиналов

👍27😁20🔥43👀2

27 Jul 2026, 07:51 UTC636 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @punkopenVideo

Шелтон привел Фиса поболеть за свою возлюбленную. Та отдала голевую @punkopen

26💘1

25 Jul 2026, 13:14 UTC899 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Очередной день — и очередной матч, в котором мы можем убедиться, что укороченные Бублика — самый переоцененный элемент в современном теннисе. Многие называют этот элемент в арсенале Санька Tier S. А по факту на укороченных он еле выходит в ноль: берет объемами и чаще всего выигрывает очко после дропа лишь потому, что действительно обладает классной игрой с лёта и отличным чувством мяча. А вот понимание того, когда ну

👍17😁62👏1

23 Jul 2026, 09:11 UTC947 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Как же гениально она формулирует мысли. Сначала может показаться, что она предпочитает Янника, но потом понимаешь: в этом противостоянии просто невозможно занять чью-то сторону. А почему всё-таки Янник? Оказывается, у них с Ариной похожие стили игры и у обоих великолепный форхенд. Карлос же, судя по всему, обладая ударом справа уровня Бенуа Пэра, явно не дотягивает до стандартов, заданных БЕЛАЗом и Янником! Тот самы

😁42🤮32

19 Jul 2026, 22:25 UTC≈1,090 views41 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если бы не подсос на Мороне, то никто так бы и не узнал, что Ходар был на финале @ioannblog

😁392

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @ioannblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Записки Иуданна” (@ioannblog), 2,051 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ioannblog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.