Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 019

Channel

019

@ioskelk

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

440subscribers

+46 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002845553964
TypeChannel
Username@ioskelk
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ioskelk

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

355440397.511 August 2026 — 394 subscribers11 August 2026 — 394 subscribers18 August 2026 — 388 subscribers25 August 2026 — 378 subscribers2 September 2026 — 368 subscribers10 September 2026 — 355 subscribers19 September 2026 — 440 subscribers11 August 202619 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net +46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 342–453 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 15:19440+85
10 Sept 2026, 15:38355-13
2 Sept 2026, 02:27368-10
25 Aug 2026, 13:05378-10
18 Aug 2026, 04:03388-6
11 Aug 2026, 05:15394no change
11 Aug 2026, 05:02394first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

337 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 529889019176578644410230.3%
custom 52988403572602522469227.3%
custom 53890693050925182906318.7%
custom 53863080061934131745115.1%
custom 5386827838970148033298.61%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 337 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 01:03 UTC62 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

الرابعة صباحا وكل شيء بائس

custom 52988901917657864442custom 53890693050925182902

5 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC111 views11 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Grief.

custom 52988403572602522469custom 52988901917657864442

31 Jul 2026, 14:50 UTC198 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Not cozy at all - Hard to live but cozy to die

custom 52988403572602522468custom 52988901917657864444custom 53890693050925182903

17 Jul 2026, 14:36 UTC278 views15 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52988901917657864449custom 53863080061934131743custom 53890693050925182903

8 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTC338 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026

‏مَا عادَ فِي النفسِ للأحلامِ مُتَّسع قَد أرهقُوا القلبَ أحبَابي وأعدائِي

custom 52988403572602522467custom 53863080061934131743custom 52988901917657864442

4 Jul 2026, 20:17 UTC339 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

The silence was broken only by the engine's drone.

custom 52988901917657864445custom 53890693050925182903custom 53863080061934131741custom 53868278389701480331

4 Jul 2026, 20:17 UTC336 views14 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53890693050925182909custom 52988403572602522462custom 53863080061934131742custom 53868278389701480331

28 Jun 2026, 20:13 UTC392 views13 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52988403572602522468custom 53863080061934131742custom 53868278389701480332custom 52988901917657864441

19 Jun 2026, 15:53 UTC444 views17 reactionsread 11 August 2026

I shared my bread, I shared my darkest nights While you were sharpening your blade out of sight!

custom 53863080061934131749custom 52988403572602522463custom 53890693050925182903custom 52988901917657864441custom 53868278389701480331

19 Jun 2026, 15:53 UTC438 views16 reactionsread 11 August 2026

You played the part, you wore the mask so well A guardian angel in a living hell

custom 53863080061934131749custom 52988403572602522462custom 52988901917657864442custom 53890693050925182902custom 53868278389701480331

12 Jun 2026, 12:10 UTC532 views18 reactionsread 11 August 2026

أُدين للكتب بكل ما هو طيب في نفسي

custom 529889019176578644411custom 53890693050925182903custom 52988403572602522462custom 53863080061934131741custom 53868278389701480331

10 Jun 2026, 09:31 UTC615 views22 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 529889019176578644415custom 52988403572602522462custom 53868278389701480332custom 53890693050925182902custom 53863080061934131741

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ioskelk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“019” (@ioskelk), 440 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ioskelk.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.